Efficacy of Sedation by Midazolam in Association With Meperidine or Fentanyl and Role of Patient Distress During Elective Colonoscopy.

Stefano Pontone, Rossella Palma, Giuseppe Donato, Raffaele Borghini, Stefano Frattaroli, Marilena Raniolo, Cristina Panetta, Marco Lauriola
{"title":"Efficacy of Sedation by Midazolam in Association With Meperidine or Fentanyl and Role of Patient Distress During Elective Colonoscopy.","authors":"Stefano Pontone,&nbsp;Rossella Palma,&nbsp;Giuseppe Donato,&nbsp;Raffaele Borghini,&nbsp;Stefano Frattaroli,&nbsp;Marilena Raniolo,&nbsp;Cristina Panetta,&nbsp;Marco Lauriola","doi":"10.1097/SGA.0000000000000456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Meperidine and fentanyl are opioids currently used in addition to midazolam for sedation and analgesia during colonoscopy in Italy. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of patients' psychological state before elective colonoscopy on the efficacy of the sedation regimens. Eighty outpatients who underwent an elective colonoscopy were included in our study. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire was self-administered to evaluate basal anxiety and depression state. The rate of baseline discomfort was evaluated by a standard 100-mm visual analog scale. Sedation was obtained alternatively with a midazolam-meperidine or midazolam-fentanyl combination. There were no statistically significant differences between the fentanyl and meperidine groups on body mass index, age, and gender composition. Patients in the meperidine group reported less pain during colonoscopy than patients in the fentanyl group. There were statistically significant positive correlations in the meperidine group with the distress, anxiety, and depression. Our study has pointed out greater effectiveness of the midazolam plus meperidine regimen, equal recovery times, and no significant differences in the duration of the endoscopic examinations. The evaluation of patients' psychological status seems to predict the efficacy of sedation when the nociceptive component of pain is well controlled.</p>","PeriodicalId":504885,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology nursing : the official journal of the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates","volume":" ","pages":"258-263"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/SGA.0000000000000456","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology nursing : the official journal of the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SGA.0000000000000456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Meperidine and fentanyl are opioids currently used in addition to midazolam for sedation and analgesia during colonoscopy in Italy. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of patients' psychological state before elective colonoscopy on the efficacy of the sedation regimens. Eighty outpatients who underwent an elective colonoscopy were included in our study. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire was self-administered to evaluate basal anxiety and depression state. The rate of baseline discomfort was evaluated by a standard 100-mm visual analog scale. Sedation was obtained alternatively with a midazolam-meperidine or midazolam-fentanyl combination. There were no statistically significant differences between the fentanyl and meperidine groups on body mass index, age, and gender composition. Patients in the meperidine group reported less pain during colonoscopy than patients in the fentanyl group. There were statistically significant positive correlations in the meperidine group with the distress, anxiety, and depression. Our study has pointed out greater effectiveness of the midazolam plus meperidine regimen, equal recovery times, and no significant differences in the duration of the endoscopic examinations. The evaluation of patients' psychological status seems to predict the efficacy of sedation when the nociceptive component of pain is well controlled.

选择性结肠镜检查中咪达唑仑与哌啶或芬太尼联合镇静的疗效及患者窘迫的作用。
在意大利,除咪达唑仑外,哌替啶和芬太尼是目前用于结肠镜检查镇静和镇痛的阿片类药物。本研究的目的是评估患者择期结肠镜检查前的心理状态对镇静方案效果的影响。80例门诊患者接受了选择性结肠镜检查,纳入了我们的研究。采用医院焦虑抑郁量表自我评估基础焦虑抑郁状态。基线不适率通过标准100毫米视觉模拟量表评估。镇静交替使用咪达唑仑-哌嗪或咪达唑仑-芬太尼联合用药。芬太尼组和哌替啶组在体重指数、年龄和性别构成方面无统计学差异。与芬太尼组相比,哌替啶组患者报告结肠镜检查时疼痛减轻。哌替啶组与苦恼、焦虑、抑郁有统计学显著正相关。我们的研究指出咪达唑仑加哌嗪方案更有效,恢复时间相等,内窥镜检查时间无显著差异。当疼痛的伤害性成分得到良好控制时,患者心理状态的评估似乎可以预测镇静的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信