Risk Assessment of Tractor-Related Hazards Based on Accident Cases.

IF 0.9 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Byounggap Kim, Seongyoon Lim, Seung-Yeoub Shin, Sunghyun Yum, Yu-Yong Kim, Namkyu Yun, Seokcheol Yu
{"title":"Risk Assessment of Tractor-Related Hazards Based on Accident Cases.","authors":"Byounggap Kim,&nbsp;Seongyoon Lim,&nbsp;Seung-Yeoub Shin,&nbsp;Sunghyun Yum,&nbsp;Yu-Yong Kim,&nbsp;Namkyu Yun,&nbsp;Seokcheol Yu","doi":"10.13031/jash.13076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Annually, tractor accidents are estimated to account for more than 100 deaths in South Korea. Periodic accident surveys have served as an essential means for the National Institute of Agricultural Sciences (NAS) to develop strategies to prevent tractor accidents. In this study, hazards leading to accidents were identified, and their risks were assessed based on survey results to establish a more effective accident prevention strategy. Risk assessment for hazards proceeded as follows: hazard identification, frequency estimation, number of equivalent fatalities (NEF) estimation, and finally risk evaluation. Hazards were identified by analyzing 588 accident cases from NAS surveys and performing an expert review of the analysis results by implementing a Delphi survey. The frequency and NEF of each hazard were estimated by multiplying its probabilities and the statistical results of the NAS surveys. Each hazard was plotted in a frequency-NEF (FN) diagram and evaluated according to its position. Fifty-four hazards were identified, and their frequencies and NEF values were estimated. The risk evaluation results, based on the FN diagram, revealed that no hazard was located in the \"unacceptable\" area, and two hazards (carelessness and not looking ahead carefully) were in the \"as low as reasonably practicable\" area. Thus, it is critical to mitigate the effects of these two hazards. With the risk assessment method used in this study, personnel who are engaged in the prevention of tractor accidents, such as policymakers, extension specialists, and researchers, can quantitatively predict how many cases or fatalities can be reduced by eliminating a certain hazard.</p>","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.13031/jash.13076","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13031/jash.13076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Annually, tractor accidents are estimated to account for more than 100 deaths in South Korea. Periodic accident surveys have served as an essential means for the National Institute of Agricultural Sciences (NAS) to develop strategies to prevent tractor accidents. In this study, hazards leading to accidents were identified, and their risks were assessed based on survey results to establish a more effective accident prevention strategy. Risk assessment for hazards proceeded as follows: hazard identification, frequency estimation, number of equivalent fatalities (NEF) estimation, and finally risk evaluation. Hazards were identified by analyzing 588 accident cases from NAS surveys and performing an expert review of the analysis results by implementing a Delphi survey. The frequency and NEF of each hazard were estimated by multiplying its probabilities and the statistical results of the NAS surveys. Each hazard was plotted in a frequency-NEF (FN) diagram and evaluated according to its position. Fifty-four hazards were identified, and their frequencies and NEF values were estimated. The risk evaluation results, based on the FN diagram, revealed that no hazard was located in the "unacceptable" area, and two hazards (carelessness and not looking ahead carefully) were in the "as low as reasonably practicable" area. Thus, it is critical to mitigate the effects of these two hazards. With the risk assessment method used in this study, personnel who are engaged in the prevention of tractor accidents, such as policymakers, extension specialists, and researchers, can quantitatively predict how many cases or fatalities can be reduced by eliminating a certain hazard.

基于事故案例的拖拉机相关危害风险评估
据估计,韩国每年有100多人死于拖拉机事故。定期事故调查已成为国家农业科学研究所(NAS)制定预防拖拉机事故战略的重要手段。在本研究中,识别导致事故的危险因素,并根据调查结果评估其风险,以建立更有效的事故预防策略。危险源的风险评估过程如下:危险源识别、危险源频率估计、等效死亡人数(NEF)估计,最后进行危险源评估。通过分析来自NAS调查的588个事故案例,并通过实施德尔菲调查对分析结果进行专家审查,确定了危害。通过将每种灾害的概率与NAS调查的统计结果相乘来估计每种灾害的发生频率和NEF。将每个危险绘制在频率- nef (FN)图中,并根据其位置进行评估。确定了54种危害,并估计了它们的频率和NEF值。基于FN图的风险评价结果显示,没有危害位于“不可接受”区域,两个危害(粗心大意和不仔细展望)位于“合理可行的最低限度”区域。因此,减轻这两种危害的影响至关重要。利用本研究中使用的风险评估方法,从事拖拉机事故预防工作的人员,如政策制定者、推广专家和研究人员,可以定量预测通过消除某种危害可以减少多少病例或死亡人数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health
Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信