Implementation of anesthesia quality indicators in Germany : A prospective, national, multicenter quality improvement study.

4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Anaesthesist Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2020-07-06 DOI:10.1007/s00101-020-00773-y
S Ziemann, M Coburn, R Rossaint, J Van Waesberghe, H Bürkle, M Fries, M Henrich, D Henzler, T Iber, J Karst, O Kunitz, R Löb, W Meißner, P Meybohm, B Mierke, F Pabst, G Schaelte, J Schiff, M Soehle, M Winterhalter, A Kowark
{"title":"Implementation of anesthesia quality indicators in Germany : A prospective, national, multicenter quality improvement study.","authors":"S Ziemann,&nbsp;M Coburn,&nbsp;R Rossaint,&nbsp;J Van Waesberghe,&nbsp;H Bürkle,&nbsp;M Fries,&nbsp;M Henrich,&nbsp;D Henzler,&nbsp;T Iber,&nbsp;J Karst,&nbsp;O Kunitz,&nbsp;R Löb,&nbsp;W Meißner,&nbsp;P Meybohm,&nbsp;B Mierke,&nbsp;F Pabst,&nbsp;G Schaelte,&nbsp;J Schiff,&nbsp;M Soehle,&nbsp;M Winterhalter,&nbsp;A Kowark","doi":"10.1007/s00101-020-00773-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2016 the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) and the Association of German Anesthetists (BDA) published 10 quality indicators (QI) to compare and improve the quality of anesthesia care in Germany. So far, there is no evidence for the feasibility of implementation of these QI in hospitals.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study tested the hypothesis that the implementation of the 10 QI is feasible in German hospitals.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This prospective three-phase national multicenter quality improvement study was conducted in 15 German hospitals and 1 outpatient anesthesia center from March 2017 to February 2018. The trial consisted of an initial evaluation of pre-existing structures and processes by the heads of the participating anesthesia departments, followed by a 6-month implementation phase of the QI as well as a final re-evaluation phase. The implementation procedure was supported by web-based implementation aids ( www.qi-an.org ) and internal quality management programs. The primary endpoint was the difference in the number of implemented QI per center before and after implementation. Secondary endpoints were the number of newly implemented QI per center, the overall number of successful implementations of each QI, the identification of problems during the implementation as well as the kind of impediments preventing the QI implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average number of implemented QI increased from 5.8 to 6.8 (mean of the differences 1.1 ± 1.3; P < 0.01). Most frequently the QI perioperative morbidity and mortality report (5 centers) and the QI temperature management (4 centers) could be implemented. After the implementation phase, the QI incidence management and patient blood management were implemented in all 16 centers. Implementation of other quality indicators failed mainly due to a lack of time and lack of structural resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study the implementation of QI was proven to be mostly feasible in the participating German hospitals. Although several QI could be implemented with minor effort, more time, financial and structural resources would be required for some QI, such as the QI postoperative visit.</p>","PeriodicalId":50796,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesist","volume":" ","pages":"38-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00101-020-00773-y","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-020-00773-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/7/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: In 2016 the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) and the Association of German Anesthetists (BDA) published 10 quality indicators (QI) to compare and improve the quality of anesthesia care in Germany. So far, there is no evidence for the feasibility of implementation of these QI in hospitals.

Objective: This study tested the hypothesis that the implementation of the 10 QI is feasible in German hospitals.

Material and methods: This prospective three-phase national multicenter quality improvement study was conducted in 15 German hospitals and 1 outpatient anesthesia center from March 2017 to February 2018. The trial consisted of an initial evaluation of pre-existing structures and processes by the heads of the participating anesthesia departments, followed by a 6-month implementation phase of the QI as well as a final re-evaluation phase. The implementation procedure was supported by web-based implementation aids ( www.qi-an.org ) and internal quality management programs. The primary endpoint was the difference in the number of implemented QI per center before and after implementation. Secondary endpoints were the number of newly implemented QI per center, the overall number of successful implementations of each QI, the identification of problems during the implementation as well as the kind of impediments preventing the QI implementation.

Results: The average number of implemented QI increased from 5.8 to 6.8 (mean of the differences 1.1 ± 1.3; P < 0.01). Most frequently the QI perioperative morbidity and mortality report (5 centers) and the QI temperature management (4 centers) could be implemented. After the implementation phase, the QI incidence management and patient blood management were implemented in all 16 centers. Implementation of other quality indicators failed mainly due to a lack of time and lack of structural resources.

Conclusion: In this study the implementation of QI was proven to be mostly feasible in the participating German hospitals. Although several QI could be implemented with minor effort, more time, financial and structural resources would be required for some QI, such as the QI postoperative visit.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

麻醉质量指标在德国的实施:一项前瞻性、全国性、多中心的质量改进研究。
背景:2016年,德国麻醉与重症监护医学学会(DGAI)和德国麻醉师协会(BDA)发布了10项质量指标(QI),以比较和提高德国麻醉护理的质量。到目前为止,还没有证据表明这些QI在医院实施的可行性。目的:本研究检验了德国医院实施“10气”的可行性假设。材料与方法:本前瞻性三期国家多中心质量改善研究于2017年3月至2018年2月在德国15家医院和1家门诊麻醉中心进行。试验包括由参与的麻醉部门负责人对已有的结构和流程进行初步评估,随后是为期6个月的QI实施阶段以及最后的重新评估阶段。实施程序由基于网络的实施辅助工具(www.qi-an.org)和内部质量管理程序支持。主要终点是实施前后每个中心实施的QI数的差异。次要终点是每个中心新实施的QI的数量,每个QI成功实施的总数,实施过程中问题的识别以及阻碍QI实施的障碍类型。结果:实施QI的平均次数由5.8次增加到6.8次(差值平均值1.1 ±1.3;P 结论:在本研究中,QI的实施在参与的德国医院中大部分是可行的。虽然一些QI可以用较少的努力来实施,但一些QI需要更多的时间、财政和结构资源,例如QI术后访问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anaesthesist
Anaesthesist 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Anaesthesist is an internationally recognized journal de­aling with all aspects of anaesthesia and intensive medicine up to pain therapy. Der Anaesthesist addresses all specialists and scientists particularly interested in anaesthesiology and it is neighbouring areas. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics reflecting the multidisciplinary environment including pharmacotherapy, intensive medicine, emergency medicine, regional anaesthetics, pain therapy and medical law. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of relevant clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Case reports feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信