Risk assessment for the implementation of controlled human Schistosoma mansoni infection trials in Uganda.

Q2 Multidisciplinary
Jan Pieter Koopman, Moses Egesa, Anne Wajja, Moses Adriko, Jacent Nassuuna, Gyaviira Nkurunungi, Emmanuella Driciru, Gijsbert van Willigen, Stephen Cose, Maria Yazdanbakhsh, Pontiano Kaleebu, Narcis Kabatereine, Edridah Tukahebwa, Meta Roestenberg, Alison M Elliott
{"title":"Risk assessment for the implementation of controlled human <i>Schistosoma mansoni</i> infection trials in Uganda.","authors":"Jan Pieter Koopman,&nbsp;Moses Egesa,&nbsp;Anne Wajja,&nbsp;Moses Adriko,&nbsp;Jacent Nassuuna,&nbsp;Gyaviira Nkurunungi,&nbsp;Emmanuella Driciru,&nbsp;Gijsbert van Willigen,&nbsp;Stephen Cose,&nbsp;Maria Yazdanbakhsh,&nbsp;Pontiano Kaleebu,&nbsp;Narcis Kabatereine,&nbsp;Edridah Tukahebwa,&nbsp;Meta Roestenberg,&nbsp;Alison M Elliott","doi":"10.12688/aasopenres.12972.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Schistosomiasis is a parasitic infection highly prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa, and a significant cause of morbidity; it is a priority for vaccine development. A controlled human infection model for <i>Schistosoma mansoni</i> (CHI-S) with potential to accelerate vaccine development has been developed among naïve volunteers in the Netherlands. Because responses both to infections and candidate vaccines are likely to differ between endemic and non-endemic settings, we propose to establish a CHI-S in Uganda where <i>Schistosoma mansoni</i> is endemic. As part of a \"road-map\" to this goal, we have undertaken a risk assessment. We identified risks related to importing of laboratory vector snails and schistosome strains from the Netherlands to Uganda; exposure to natural infection in endemic settings concurrently with CHI-S studies, and unfamiliarity of the community with the nature, risks and rationale for CHI. Mitigating strategies are proposed. With careful implementation of the latter, we believe that CHI-S can be implemented safely in Uganda. Our reflections are presented here to promote feedback and discussion.</p>","PeriodicalId":34179,"journal":{"name":"AAS Open Research","volume":" ","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6901351/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAS Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/aasopenres.12972.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Schistosomiasis is a parasitic infection highly prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa, and a significant cause of morbidity; it is a priority for vaccine development. A controlled human infection model for Schistosoma mansoni (CHI-S) with potential to accelerate vaccine development has been developed among naïve volunteers in the Netherlands. Because responses both to infections and candidate vaccines are likely to differ between endemic and non-endemic settings, we propose to establish a CHI-S in Uganda where Schistosoma mansoni is endemic. As part of a "road-map" to this goal, we have undertaken a risk assessment. We identified risks related to importing of laboratory vector snails and schistosome strains from the Netherlands to Uganda; exposure to natural infection in endemic settings concurrently with CHI-S studies, and unfamiliarity of the community with the nature, risks and rationale for CHI. Mitigating strategies are proposed. With careful implementation of the latter, we believe that CHI-S can be implemented safely in Uganda. Our reflections are presented here to promote feedback and discussion.

在乌干达实施受控制的人类曼氏血吸虫感染试验的风险评估。
血吸虫病是撒哈拉以南非洲高度流行的一种寄生虫感染,也是发病的一个重要原因;这是疫苗开发的一个重点。在荷兰naïve志愿者中开发了一种具有加速疫苗开发潜力的曼氏血吸虫(CHI-S)受控人感染模型。由于对感染和候选疫苗的反应可能在流行和非流行环境中有所不同,我们建议在曼氏血吸虫流行的乌干达建立CHI-S。作为实现这一目标的“路线图”的一部分,我们进行了风险评估。我们确定了从荷兰向乌干达输入实验室病媒蜗牛和血吸虫菌株的风险;在流行环境中暴露于自然感染,同时进行CHI- s研究,以及社区对CHI的性质、风险和理由不熟悉。提出了缓解策略。通过对后者的认真实施,我们相信CHI-S可以在乌干达安全实施。我们在这里提出的想法是为了促进反馈和讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AAS Open Research
AAS Open Research Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信