Aligning Practice Data and Institution-specific CPD: Medical Quality Management as the Driver for an eLearning Development Process.

Journal of European CME Pub Date : 2020-04-23 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1080/21614083.2020.1754120
Douglas Archibald, Joseph K Burns, Michael Fitzgerald, Véronique French Merkley
{"title":"Aligning Practice Data and Institution-specific CPD: Medical Quality Management as the Driver for an eLearning Development Process.","authors":"Douglas Archibald,&nbsp;Joseph K Burns,&nbsp;Michael Fitzgerald,&nbsp;Véronique French Merkley","doi":"10.1080/21614083.2020.1754120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For hospital physicians, alignment of Continuing Professional Development (CPD) with quality improvement efforts is often absent or rudimentary. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a CPD development process that created accessible learning opportunities and aligned CPD with practice data. We conducted a chart audit to identify patient safety and quality of care issues within the institution, then established an eLearning approach that supported quick and cost effective development of high-quality interactive CPD opportunities. We tested a pilot module on the management of common infections in sub-acute care settings with fifteen (68%) residents and three staff physicians to evaluate the approach. One resident and three staff agreed to a follow-up interview. The satisfaction survey indicated that participants felt the content was generally appropriate and the module well designed. Significant improvements to knowledge were reported in the multi-drug resistance (Mean Difference = 25%, p = 0.002), infection management (MD = 32%, p < 0.001), and cellulitis risk factor (MD = 22%, p = 0.02) questions, as well as in the overall score (MD = 19%, p < 0.001). In terms of confidence in their answers, the mean rating pre-module was 3.17, rising significantly to 3.92 post-module (p < 0.001). In this way, collaboration between quality management and education committees allowed for the development of relevant CPD for physicians, with eLearning providing a timely and accessible way to deliver training on emerging issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":87300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European CME","volume":"9 1","pages":"1754120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21614083.2020.1754120","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European CME","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2020.1754120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

For hospital physicians, alignment of Continuing Professional Development (CPD) with quality improvement efforts is often absent or rudimentary. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a CPD development process that created accessible learning opportunities and aligned CPD with practice data. We conducted a chart audit to identify patient safety and quality of care issues within the institution, then established an eLearning approach that supported quick and cost effective development of high-quality interactive CPD opportunities. We tested a pilot module on the management of common infections in sub-acute care settings with fifteen (68%) residents and three staff physicians to evaluate the approach. One resident and three staff agreed to a follow-up interview. The satisfaction survey indicated that participants felt the content was generally appropriate and the module well designed. Significant improvements to knowledge were reported in the multi-drug resistance (Mean Difference = 25%, p = 0.002), infection management (MD = 32%, p < 0.001), and cellulitis risk factor (MD = 22%, p = 0.02) questions, as well as in the overall score (MD = 19%, p < 0.001). In terms of confidence in their answers, the mean rating pre-module was 3.17, rising significantly to 3.92 post-module (p < 0.001). In this way, collaboration between quality management and education committees allowed for the development of relevant CPD for physicians, with eLearning providing a timely and accessible way to deliver training on emerging issues.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

调整实践数据和机构特定CPD:医疗质量管理作为电子学习发展过程的驱动力。
对于医院医生来说,持续专业发展(CPD)与质量改进工作的一致性通常是缺失的或基本的。本研究的目的是评估CPD发展过程,该过程创造了可访问的学习机会,并使CPD与实践数据保持一致。我们进行了图表审核,以确定机构内的患者安全和护理质量问题,然后建立了一个电子学习方法,支持快速和经济有效地开发高质量的交互式持续专业发展机会。我们测试了一个关于亚急性护理环境中常见感染管理的试点模块,有15名(68%)住院医生和3名主治医生来评估该方法。一名住院医生和三名工作人员同意接受后续采访。满意度调查显示,参与者认为课程内容大致合适,课程模块设计良好。多药耐药知识(Mean Difference = 25%, p = 0.002)和感染管理知识(MD = 32%, p = 0.002)均有显著提高
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信