Cultural Adaptations in Clinical InteractiONs (CoACtION): a multi-site comparative study to assess what cultural adaptations are made by clinicians in different settings.

Shanaya Rathod, Elizabeth Graves, David Kingdon, Kerensa Thorne, Farooq Naeem, Peter Phiri
{"title":"Cultural Adaptations in Clinical InteractiONs (CoACtION): a multi-site comparative study to assess what cultural adaptations are made by clinicians in different settings.","authors":"Shanaya Rathod,&nbsp;Elizabeth Graves,&nbsp;David Kingdon,&nbsp;Kerensa Thorne,&nbsp;Farooq Naeem,&nbsp;Peter Phiri","doi":"10.1080/09540261.2020.1750818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Culture influences models of mental illness, help-seeking behaviours and outcomes of interventions. Cultural competency training has been developed to improve clinician practice in addressing these issues. The study aims to identify to what extent culturally competent and informed interactions are used by clinicians in England and how patients experience these interaction. Clinicians and non-white western patients were recruited to complete a questionnaire on culturally adapted practice in 25 areas of England. Clinicians are much more likely to rate their practice as clinically competent whereas patients were more likely to disagree that services were completely culturally competent. Length of time working as clinicians, receipt of specific cultural competence training and a higher percentage of caseload from non-white western backgrounds all increased clinician's perception that their practice was culturally competent. Clinicians recognised the importance of cultural competency but the disparity between their assessment of whether they achieved this and that of patients must be addressed. Ethics approval was obtained via proportionate review from the London - Central Research Ethics Committee (REC Ref no: 17/LO/1962). <b>Study registration</b>: UK Clinical Research Network Portfolio: 36744.</p>","PeriodicalId":306151,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Psychiatry (Abingdon, England)","volume":" ","pages":"3-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09540261.2020.1750818","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Psychiatry (Abingdon, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2020.1750818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/5/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Culture influences models of mental illness, help-seeking behaviours and outcomes of interventions. Cultural competency training has been developed to improve clinician practice in addressing these issues. The study aims to identify to what extent culturally competent and informed interactions are used by clinicians in England and how patients experience these interaction. Clinicians and non-white western patients were recruited to complete a questionnaire on culturally adapted practice in 25 areas of England. Clinicians are much more likely to rate their practice as clinically competent whereas patients were more likely to disagree that services were completely culturally competent. Length of time working as clinicians, receipt of specific cultural competence training and a higher percentage of caseload from non-white western backgrounds all increased clinician's perception that their practice was culturally competent. Clinicians recognised the importance of cultural competency but the disparity between their assessment of whether they achieved this and that of patients must be addressed. Ethics approval was obtained via proportionate review from the London - Central Research Ethics Committee (REC Ref no: 17/LO/1962). Study registration: UK Clinical Research Network Portfolio: 36744.

临床互动中的文化适应(CoACtION):一项多地点比较研究,以评估临床医生在不同环境下做出的文化适应。
文化影响精神疾病的模式、寻求帮助的行为和干预的结果。文化能力培训的发展是为了提高临床医生解决这些问题的能力。该研究旨在确定英国临床医生在多大程度上使用了具有文化能力和知情的互动,以及患者如何体验这些互动。临床医生和非白人西方患者被招募来完成一份关于英国25个地区文化适应性实践的问卷调查。临床医生更有可能将他们的实践评价为临床胜任,而患者更有可能不同意服务完全具有文化胜任能力。作为临床医生工作的时间长度、接受特定文化能力培训以及来自非白人西方背景的较高比例的病例,都增加了临床医生对他们的实践具有文化能力的看法。临床医生认识到文化能力的重要性,但他们对自己是否达到这一点的评估与对患者的评估之间的差异必须得到解决。通过伦敦中央研究伦理委员会(REC Ref no: 17/LO/1962)的比例审查获得伦理批准。研究注册:英国临床研究网络组合:36744。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信