Karin Zachrisson, Ferid Krupic, Mikael Svensson, Ann Wigelius, Andreas Jonsson, Angeliki Dimopoulou, Anna Stenborg, Gert Jensen, Hans Herlitz, Anders Gottsäter, Mårten Falkenberg
{"title":"Results of renal artery revascularization in the post-ASTRAL era with 4 years mean follow-up.","authors":"Karin Zachrisson, Ferid Krupic, Mikael Svensson, Ann Wigelius, Andreas Jonsson, Angeliki Dimopoulou, Anna Stenborg, Gert Jensen, Hans Herlitz, Anders Gottsäter, Mårten Falkenberg","doi":"10.1080/08037051.2020.1756740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To investigate contemporary results of percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA).<b>Materials and Methods:</b> A multicentre retrospective study analysing all patients treated with PTRA for primary symptomatic renal artery stenosis (RAS) between 2010 and 2013 at four tertiary centres. Procedures during the preceding four years were counted to evaluate for change in PTRA frequency.<b>Results:</b> The number of PTRA procedures decreased by approximately 50% from 2006 to 2013. Patients treated in the post-ASTRAL period (<i>n</i> = 224) had a significant reduction in mean systolic pressure (168 to 146 mmHg, <i>p</i> < 0.01), diastolic pressure (84 to 76 mmHg, <i>p</i> < 0.01), number of anti-hypertensive drugs (3.54 to 3.05, <i>p</i> < 0.01), and anti-hypertensive treatment index (21.75 to 16.92, <i>p</i> < 0.01) compared to before PTRA. These improvements were maintained at one year and at the last clinical evaluation after a mean follow-up of 4.31 years. Renal function increased transiently without sustained improvement, or deterioration, during later follow-up. Thirteen patients (5.8%) eventually required dialysis, nine of these had eGFR <20 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> before PTRA. There was no difference in outcomes between subgroups differentiated by different indications for PTRA.<b>Conclusion:</b> The frequency of PTRA has decreased, indicating a higher threshold for invasive treatment of RAS in recent years. The reduction in blood pressures, the reduced need for anti-hypertensive medication, and stabilization of renal function over time suggest a clinical benefit for most patients who are now being treated with PTRA.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08037051.2020.1756740","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2020.1756740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate contemporary results of percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA).Materials and Methods: A multicentre retrospective study analysing all patients treated with PTRA for primary symptomatic renal artery stenosis (RAS) between 2010 and 2013 at four tertiary centres. Procedures during the preceding four years were counted to evaluate for change in PTRA frequency.Results: The number of PTRA procedures decreased by approximately 50% from 2006 to 2013. Patients treated in the post-ASTRAL period (n = 224) had a significant reduction in mean systolic pressure (168 to 146 mmHg, p < 0.01), diastolic pressure (84 to 76 mmHg, p < 0.01), number of anti-hypertensive drugs (3.54 to 3.05, p < 0.01), and anti-hypertensive treatment index (21.75 to 16.92, p < 0.01) compared to before PTRA. These improvements were maintained at one year and at the last clinical evaluation after a mean follow-up of 4.31 years. Renal function increased transiently without sustained improvement, or deterioration, during later follow-up. Thirteen patients (5.8%) eventually required dialysis, nine of these had eGFR <20 ml/min/1.73 m2 before PTRA. There was no difference in outcomes between subgroups differentiated by different indications for PTRA.Conclusion: The frequency of PTRA has decreased, indicating a higher threshold for invasive treatment of RAS in recent years. The reduction in blood pressures, the reduced need for anti-hypertensive medication, and stabilization of renal function over time suggest a clinical benefit for most patients who are now being treated with PTRA.
目的:探讨经皮腔内肾血管成形术(PTRA)的临床效果。材料和方法:一项多中心回顾性研究,分析了2010年至2013年在四个三级中心接受PTRA治疗原发性症状性肾动脉狭窄(RAS)的所有患者。统计前四年的手术过程,以评估PTRA频率的变化。结果:从2006年到2013年,PTRA手术的数量减少了约50%。在astral后治疗的患者(n = 224)在PTRA前平均收缩压显著降低(168 - 146 mmHg, p p p p 2)。不同适应症的PTRA亚组之间的结果没有差异。结论:近年来,PTRA的发生频率有所下降,表明RAS有创治疗的门槛有所提高。随着时间的推移,血压的降低、抗高血压药物需求的减少以及肾功能的稳定表明,对于大多数正在接受PTRA治疗的患者来说,这是一种临床益处。