Dietary advice and oral nutritional supplements do not increase survival in older malnourished adults: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Upsala journal of medical sciences Pub Date : 2020-08-01 Epub Date: 2020-05-02 DOI:10.1080/03009734.2020.1751752
Lisa Söderström, Andreas Rosenblad, Leif Bergkvist, Hanna Frid, Eva Thors Adolfsson
{"title":"Dietary advice and oral nutritional supplements do not increase survival in older malnourished adults: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Lisa Söderström, Andreas Rosenblad, Leif Bergkvist, Hanna Frid, Eva Thors Adolfsson","doi":"10.1080/03009734.2020.1751752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> The study aimed to investigate the effect on survival after 6 months of treatment involving individual dietary advice and oral nutritional supplements in older malnourished adults after discharge from hospital.<b>Methods:</b> This multicentre randomised controlled trial included 671 patients aged 65 years who were malnourished or at risk of malnutrition when admitted to hospital between 2010 and 2014, and followed up after 8.2 years (median 4.1 years). Patients were randomised to receive dietary advice or oral nutritional supplements, separate or in combination, or routine care. The intervention started at discharge from the hospital and continued for 6 months, with survival being the main outcome measure.<b>Results:</b> During the follow-up period 398 (59.3%) participants died. At follow-up, the survival rates were 36.9% for dietary advice, 42.4% for oral nutritional supplements, 40.2% for dietary advice combined with oral nutritional supplements, and 43.3% for the control group (log-rank test <i>p</i> = 0.762). After stratifying the participants according to nutritional status, survival still did not differ significantly between the treatment arms (log-rank test <i>p</i> = 0.480 and <i>p</i> = 0.298 for the 506 participants at risk of malnutrition and the 165 malnourished participants, respectively).<b>Conclusions:</b> Oral nutritional supplements with or without dietary advice, or dietary advice alone, do not improve the survival of malnourished older adults. These results do not support the routine use of supplements in older malnourished adults, provided that survival is the aim of the treatment.<b>Trial registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov with ID: NCT01057914.</p>","PeriodicalId":23458,"journal":{"name":"Upsala journal of medical sciences","volume":"125 3","pages":"240-249"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7721033/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Upsala journal of medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03009734.2020.1751752","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The study aimed to investigate the effect on survival after 6 months of treatment involving individual dietary advice and oral nutritional supplements in older malnourished adults after discharge from hospital.Methods: This multicentre randomised controlled trial included 671 patients aged 65 years who were malnourished or at risk of malnutrition when admitted to hospital between 2010 and 2014, and followed up after 8.2 years (median 4.1 years). Patients were randomised to receive dietary advice or oral nutritional supplements, separate or in combination, or routine care. The intervention started at discharge from the hospital and continued for 6 months, with survival being the main outcome measure.Results: During the follow-up period 398 (59.3%) participants died. At follow-up, the survival rates were 36.9% for dietary advice, 42.4% for oral nutritional supplements, 40.2% for dietary advice combined with oral nutritional supplements, and 43.3% for the control group (log-rank test p = 0.762). After stratifying the participants according to nutritional status, survival still did not differ significantly between the treatment arms (log-rank test p = 0.480 and p = 0.298 for the 506 participants at risk of malnutrition and the 165 malnourished participants, respectively).Conclusions: Oral nutritional supplements with or without dietary advice, or dietary advice alone, do not improve the survival of malnourished older adults. These results do not support the routine use of supplements in older malnourished adults, provided that survival is the aim of the treatment.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov with ID: NCT01057914.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

饮食建议和口服营养补充剂并不能提高营养不良老年人的存活率:一项多中心随机对照试验。
研究目的该研究旨在调查老年营养不良患者出院后接受个人饮食建议和口服营养补充剂治疗 6 个月后对生存率的影响:这项多中心随机对照试验纳入了 671 名 65 岁患者,他们在 2010 年至 2014 年期间入院时营养不良或面临营养不良风险,并在 8.2 年(中位数为 4.1 年)后进行了随访。患者被随机分配接受饮食建议、口服营养补充剂(单独或联合使用)或常规护理。干预措施从患者出院开始,持续6个月,以生存率为主要结果指标:在随访期间,398 名参与者(59.3%)死亡。随访期间,饮食建议组的存活率为 36.9%,口服营养补充剂组的存活率为 42.4%,饮食建议与口服营养补充剂相结合组的存活率为 40.2%,对照组的存活率为 43.3%(对数秩检验 p = 0.762)。根据营养状况对参与者进行分层后,治疗组之间的存活率仍无显著差异(506 名有营养不良风险的参与者和 165 名营养不良的参与者的对数秩检验 p = 0.480 和 p = 0.298):结论:口服营养补充剂加或不加饮食建议,或只加饮食建议,都不能提高营养不良老年人的存活率。这些结果并不支持对营养不良的老年人常规使用营养补充剂,只要生存是治疗的目的:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,ID:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,ID:NCT01057914。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Upsala journal of medical sciences
Upsala journal of medical sciences 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences is published for the Upsala Medical Society. It has been published since 1865 and is one of the oldest medical journals in Sweden. The journal publishes clinical and experimental original works in the medical field. Although focusing on regional issues, the journal always welcomes contributions from outside Sweden. Specially extended issues are published occasionally, dealing with special topics, congress proceedings and academic dissertations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信