Mental health framework: coronavirus pandemic in post-Katrina New Orleans.

Denese O Shervington, Lisa Richardson
{"title":"Mental health framework: coronavirus pandemic in post-Katrina New Orleans.","authors":"Denese O Shervington, Lisa Richardson","doi":"10.5249/jivr.v12i2.1538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The United Nations Office of Disaster Risk Reduction defines disaster risk as the \"likelihood of loss of life, injury or destruction and damage from a disaster in a given period, and a product of the complex interactions that generate conditions of exposure, vulnerability and hazard\". Racial and ethnic minorities in the United States have been shown to have increased vulnerability and risk to disasters due to links between racism, vulnerability, and economic power, based on disadvantage related to different disaster stages: 1) reduced perception of personal disaster risk; 2) lack of preparedness; 3) reduced access and response to warning systems; 4) increased physical impacts due to substandard housing; 5) likelihood of poorer psychological outcomes; 6) cultural insensitivity on the part of emergency workers; 7) marginalization, lower socio-economic status, and less familiarity with support resources leading to protracted recovery; and 8) diminished standard of living, job loss, and exacerbated poverty during reconstruction and community rebuilding. Moreover, given that psychiatric morbidity is predictable in populations exposed to disasters, mental health and psychosocial support programs should increasingly become a standard part of a humanitarian response. In the crisis and immediate recovery phase of disasters, the focus should be on making survivors feel safe and giving them assistance in decreasing their anxiety by addressing their basic needs and welfare. So, it is critical that governmental institutions, business, and non-profit organizations proactively find mechanisms to work collaboratively and share resources. Special attention and extra resources must be directed towards vulnerable and marginalized populations. In this editorial we share lessons learned from experiencing disproportionate impact of health crisis and advocate for the notion that recovery efforts must address trauma at individual, interpersonal and community levels, and be based in a healing justice framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":73795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of injury & violence research","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of injury & violence research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5249/jivr.v12i2.1538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The United Nations Office of Disaster Risk Reduction defines disaster risk as the "likelihood of loss of life, injury or destruction and damage from a disaster in a given period, and a product of the complex interactions that generate conditions of exposure, vulnerability and hazard". Racial and ethnic minorities in the United States have been shown to have increased vulnerability and risk to disasters due to links between racism, vulnerability, and economic power, based on disadvantage related to different disaster stages: 1) reduced perception of personal disaster risk; 2) lack of preparedness; 3) reduced access and response to warning systems; 4) increased physical impacts due to substandard housing; 5) likelihood of poorer psychological outcomes; 6) cultural insensitivity on the part of emergency workers; 7) marginalization, lower socio-economic status, and less familiarity with support resources leading to protracted recovery; and 8) diminished standard of living, job loss, and exacerbated poverty during reconstruction and community rebuilding. Moreover, given that psychiatric morbidity is predictable in populations exposed to disasters, mental health and psychosocial support programs should increasingly become a standard part of a humanitarian response. In the crisis and immediate recovery phase of disasters, the focus should be on making survivors feel safe and giving them assistance in decreasing their anxiety by addressing their basic needs and welfare. So, it is critical that governmental institutions, business, and non-profit organizations proactively find mechanisms to work collaboratively and share resources. Special attention and extra resources must be directed towards vulnerable and marginalized populations. In this editorial we share lessons learned from experiencing disproportionate impact of health crisis and advocate for the notion that recovery efforts must address trauma at individual, interpersonal and community levels, and be based in a healing justice framework.

心理健康框架:卡特里娜飓风后新奥尔良的冠状病毒大流行。
联合国减少灾害风险办公室将灾害风险定义为 "在一定时期内因灾害造成生命损失、伤害或破坏和损害的可能性,是产生暴露、脆弱性和危害条件的复杂相互作用的产物"。在美国,由于种族主义、脆弱性和经济实力之间的联系,基于与不同灾害阶段相关的劣势,少数种族和少数民族在灾害面前的脆弱性和风险被证明是增加的:1) 对个人灾害风险的感知降低;2) 缺乏准备;3) 对预警系统的使用和响应减少;4) 由于住房条件不达标,对身体的影响增加;5) 可能出现较差的心理结果;6) 紧急救援人员对文化不敏感;7) 边缘化、社会经济地位较低、对支持资源的熟悉程度较低,导致恢复期延长;8) 在重建和社区重建期间,生活水平下降、失业、贫困加剧。此外,鉴于受灾害影响的人群中精神病的发病率是可以预测的,心理健康和社会心理支持项目应越来越多地成为人道主义响应的标准组成部分。在灾难的危机和紧急恢复阶段,重点应该是让幸存者感到安全,并通过满足他们的基本需求和福利来帮助他们减少焦虑。因此,政府机构、企业和非营利组织必须积极主动地找到合作和资源共享的机制。必须特别关注弱势群体和边缘化人群,并为他们提供额外的资源。在这篇社论中,我们分享了从健康危机的过度影响中汲取的经验教训,并倡导这样一种理念,即恢复工作必须从个人、人际和社区层面解决创伤问题,并以愈合正义框架为基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信