Beyond Description: The Predictive Role of Affect, Memory, and Context in the Decision to Donate or Not Donate Blood.

IF 1.9
Barbara Masser, Eamonn Ferguson, Eva-Maria Merz, Lisa Williams
{"title":"Beyond Description: The Predictive Role of Affect, Memory, and Context in the Decision to Donate or Not Donate Blood.","authors":"Barbara Masser,&nbsp;Eamonn Ferguson,&nbsp;Eva-Maria Merz,&nbsp;Lisa Williams","doi":"10.1159/000501917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research on the recruitment and retention of blood donors has typically drawn on a homogeneous set of descriptive theories, viewing the decision to become and remain a donor as the outcome of affectively cold, planned, and rational decision-making by the individual. While this approach provides insight into how our donors think about blood donation, it is limited and has not translated into a suite of effective interventions. In this review, we set out to explore how a broader consideration of the influences on donor decision-making, in terms of affect, memory, and the context in which donation takes place, may yield benefit in the way we approach donor recruitment and retention.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Drawing on emerging research, we argue for the importance of considering the implications of both the positive and the negative emotions that donors experience and we argue for the importance of directly targeting affect in interventions to recruit nondonors. Next, we focus on the reconstructed nature of memory and the factors that influence what we remember about an event. We discuss how these processes may impact the retention of donors and the potential to intervene to enhance donors' recollections of their experiences. Finally, we discuss how our focus on the individual has led us to neglect the influence of the context in which donation takes place on donor behavior. We argue that the amassing of comprehensive large data sets detailing both the characteristics of the individuals and the context of their giving will ultimately allow for the more effective deployment of resources to improve recruitment and retention.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>In suggesting these directions for future research, our want is to move beyond the ways in which we have traditionally described blood donation behavior with the aim of improving our theorizing about donors while improving the translational value of our research.</p>","PeriodicalId":520820,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie","volume":" ","pages":"175-185"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000501917","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000501917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Background: Research on the recruitment and retention of blood donors has typically drawn on a homogeneous set of descriptive theories, viewing the decision to become and remain a donor as the outcome of affectively cold, planned, and rational decision-making by the individual. While this approach provides insight into how our donors think about blood donation, it is limited and has not translated into a suite of effective interventions. In this review, we set out to explore how a broader consideration of the influences on donor decision-making, in terms of affect, memory, and the context in which donation takes place, may yield benefit in the way we approach donor recruitment and retention.

Summary: Drawing on emerging research, we argue for the importance of considering the implications of both the positive and the negative emotions that donors experience and we argue for the importance of directly targeting affect in interventions to recruit nondonors. Next, we focus on the reconstructed nature of memory and the factors that influence what we remember about an event. We discuss how these processes may impact the retention of donors and the potential to intervene to enhance donors' recollections of their experiences. Finally, we discuss how our focus on the individual has led us to neglect the influence of the context in which donation takes place on donor behavior. We argue that the amassing of comprehensive large data sets detailing both the characteristics of the individuals and the context of their giving will ultimately allow for the more effective deployment of resources to improve recruitment and retention.

Key messages: In suggesting these directions for future research, our want is to move beyond the ways in which we have traditionally described blood donation behavior with the aim of improving our theorizing about donors while improving the translational value of our research.

超越描述:情感、记忆和环境在决定献血或不献血中的预测作用。
背景:关于献血者的招募和保留的研究通常采用一套同质的描述性理论,将成为献血者的决定视为个人冷静、有计划和理性决策的结果。虽然这种方法可以让我们深入了解献血者对献血的看法,但它是有限的,并没有转化为一套有效的干预措施。在这篇综述中,我们着手探索如何从情感、记忆和捐赠发生的背景等方面更广泛地考虑对捐赠者决策的影响,从而在我们招募和保留捐赠者的方式中产生益处。总结:根据新兴的研究,我们认为考虑捐赠者所经历的积极和消极情绪的影响的重要性,我们认为在招募非捐赠者的干预措施中直接针对影响的重要性。接下来,我们将关注记忆的重构本质以及影响我们对事件记忆的因素。我们将讨论这些过程如何影响捐赠者的保留,以及干预以增强捐赠者对其经历的回忆的可能性。最后,我们讨论了我们对个人的关注如何导致我们忽视了捐赠发生的背景对捐赠者行为的影响。我们认为,全面的大型数据集的积累,详细说明了个人的特点和他们的捐赠背景,最终将允许更有效地部署资源,以改善招聘和保留。关键信息:在为未来研究提出这些方向时,我们希望超越我们传统上描述献血行为的方式,目的是改进我们关于献血者的理论,同时提高我们研究的转化价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书