The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: A Cytohistological Study.

IF 1.7 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Journal of Thyroid Research Pub Date : 2020-04-16 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/8095378
Bakiarathana Anand, Anita Ramdas, Marie Moses Ambroise, Nirmal P Kumar
{"title":"The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: A Cytohistological Study.","authors":"Bakiarathana Anand,&nbsp;Anita Ramdas,&nbsp;Marie Moses Ambroise,&nbsp;Nirmal P Kumar","doi":"10.1155/2020/8095378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) is a significant step to standardize the reporting of thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA). It has high predictive value, reproducibility, and improved clinical significance.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study was aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility and reproducibility of \"TBSRTC\" at our institute. <i>Methods and Material</i>. The study included 646 thyroid FNAs which were reviewed by three pathologists and classified according to TBSRTC. Cytohistological correlation was done for 100 cases with surgical follow-up and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, diagnostic accuracy, and risk of malignancy (ROM) were calculated. The interobserver variation among three pathologists was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The distribution of cases in various TBSRTC categories is as follows: I-nondiagnostic 13.8%, II-benign 75.9%, III-atypia of undetermined significance (AUS)/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS) 1.2%, IV-follicular neoplasm (FN)/suspicious for follicular neoplasm (SFN) 3.7%, V-suspicious for malignancy (SM) 2.6%, and VI-malignant 2.8%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy are 72.4%, 94.3%, 84%, 89.2%, and 87.9%, respectively. The ROM of various TBSRTC categories were II-8.5%; III-66.7%; IV-63.6%; and V and VI-100%. Cohen's Weighted Kappa score was 0.99 which indicates almost perfect agreement among the three pathologists.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study substantiates greater reproducibility among pathologists using TBSRTC to arrive at a precise diagnosis with an added advantage of predicting the risk of malignancy which enables the clinician to plan for follow-up or surgery and also the extent of surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":17394,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thyroid Research","volume":"2020 ","pages":"8095378"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/8095378","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thyroid Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8095378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Introduction: The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) is a significant step to standardize the reporting of thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA). It has high predictive value, reproducibility, and improved clinical significance.

Aim: The study was aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility and reproducibility of "TBSRTC" at our institute. Methods and Material. The study included 646 thyroid FNAs which were reviewed by three pathologists and classified according to TBSRTC. Cytohistological correlation was done for 100 cases with surgical follow-up and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, diagnostic accuracy, and risk of malignancy (ROM) were calculated. The interobserver variation among three pathologists was also assessed.

Results: The distribution of cases in various TBSRTC categories is as follows: I-nondiagnostic 13.8%, II-benign 75.9%, III-atypia of undetermined significance (AUS)/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS) 1.2%, IV-follicular neoplasm (FN)/suspicious for follicular neoplasm (SFN) 3.7%, V-suspicious for malignancy (SM) 2.6%, and VI-malignant 2.8%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy are 72.4%, 94.3%, 84%, 89.2%, and 87.9%, respectively. The ROM of various TBSRTC categories were II-8.5%; III-66.7%; IV-63.6%; and V and VI-100%. Cohen's Weighted Kappa score was 0.99 which indicates almost perfect agreement among the three pathologists.

Conclusions: Our study substantiates greater reproducibility among pathologists using TBSRTC to arrive at a precise diagnosis with an added advantage of predicting the risk of malignancy which enables the clinician to plan for follow-up or surgery and also the extent of surgery.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Bethesda系统报告甲状腺细胞病理学:一项细胞组织学研究。
Bethesda甲状腺细胞病理学报告系统(TBSRTC)是规范甲状腺细针穿刺(FNA)报告的重要一步。具有较高的预测价值、重现性和改善临床的意义。目的:评价“TBSRTC”在我院的诊断价值和可重复性。方法和材料。本研究纳入646例甲状腺FNAs,由3名病理学家进行综述,并按TBSRTC进行分类。对100例手术随访的患者进行细胞组织学相关性分析,计算其敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、诊断准确性、恶性肿瘤风险(ROM)。还评估了三名病理学家之间的观察者间差异。结果:TBSRTC各分类病例分布为:ⅰ型非诊断性13.8%,ⅱ型良性75.9%,ⅲ型不确定意义异型(AUS)/不确定意义滤泡性病变(FLUS) 1.2%,ⅳ型滤泡性肿瘤(FN)/滤泡性肿瘤可疑(SFN) 3.7%,ⅴ型可疑恶性(SM) 2.6%,ⅵ型恶性2.8%。敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、诊断准确率分别为72.4%、94.3%、84%、89.2%、87.9%。各TBSRTC类别的ROM为II-8.5%;3 - 66.7%;4 - 63.6%;V和VI-100%。科恩的加权Kappa评分为0.99,这表明三位病理学家几乎完全一致。结论:我们的研究证实了病理学家使用TBSRTC获得精确诊断的更高的重复性,并具有预测恶性肿瘤风险的额外优势,这使临床医生能够计划随访或手术以及手术的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Thyroid Research
Journal of Thyroid Research ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信