Motivational Interviewing to Support Oral AntiCoagulation adherence in patients with non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (MISOAC-AF): a randomized clinical trial.

Apostolos Tzikas, Athanasios Samaras, Anastasios Kartas, Dimitra Vasdeki, George Fotos, George Dividis, Eleni Paschou, Evropi Forozidou, Paraskevi Tsoukra, Eleni Kotsi, Ioannis Goulas, Haralambos Karvounis, George Giannakoulas
{"title":"Motivational Interviewing to Support Oral AntiCoagulation adherence in patients with non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (MISOAC-AF): a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Apostolos Tzikas,&nbsp;Athanasios Samaras,&nbsp;Anastasios Kartas,&nbsp;Dimitra Vasdeki,&nbsp;George Fotos,&nbsp;George Dividis,&nbsp;Eleni Paschou,&nbsp;Evropi Forozidou,&nbsp;Paraskevi Tsoukra,&nbsp;Eleni Kotsi,&nbsp;Ioannis Goulas,&nbsp;Haralambos Karvounis,&nbsp;George Giannakoulas","doi":"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to assess the impact of an educational, motivational intervention on the adherence to oral anticoagulation (OAC) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Hospitalized patients with non-valvular AF who received OAC were randomly assigned to usual medical care or a proactive intervention, comprising motivational interviewing, and tailored counselling on medication adherence. The primary study outcome was adherence to OAC at 1 year, which was evaluated according to proportion of days covered (PDC) by OAC regimens and was assessed through nationwide registers of prescription claims. Secondary outcomes included the rate of persistence to OAC, gaps in treatment, and clinical events. A total of 1009 patients were randomized, 500 in the intervention group and 509 in the control group. At 1-year follow-up, 77.2% (386/500) of patients in the intervention group were adherent (PDC > 80%), compared with 55% (280/509) in the control group [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.14-3.75; P < 0.001]. Mean PDC ± standard deviation was 0.85 ± 0.26 and 0.75 ± 0.31, respectively (P < 0.001). Patients that received the intervention were more likely to persist in their OAC therapy at 1 year (aOR 2.42, 95% CI 1.71-3.41; P < 0.001). Usual medical care was associated with more major (≥3 months) treatment gaps (aOR 2.39, 95% CI 1.76-3.26; P < 0.001). Clinical events over a median follow-up period of 2 years did not differ among treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients receiving OAC therapy for non-valvular AF, a multilevel motivational intervention significantly improved medication adherence and rate of therapy persistence, and reduced major gaps in treatment. No significant impact on clinical outcomes was observed.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT02941978.</p>","PeriodicalId":11995,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal — Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"f63-f71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa039","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal — Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Aims: We aimed to assess the impact of an educational, motivational intervention on the adherence to oral anticoagulation (OAC) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods and results: Hospitalized patients with non-valvular AF who received OAC were randomly assigned to usual medical care or a proactive intervention, comprising motivational interviewing, and tailored counselling on medication adherence. The primary study outcome was adherence to OAC at 1 year, which was evaluated according to proportion of days covered (PDC) by OAC regimens and was assessed through nationwide registers of prescription claims. Secondary outcomes included the rate of persistence to OAC, gaps in treatment, and clinical events. A total of 1009 patients were randomized, 500 in the intervention group and 509 in the control group. At 1-year follow-up, 77.2% (386/500) of patients in the intervention group were adherent (PDC > 80%), compared with 55% (280/509) in the control group [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.14-3.75; P < 0.001]. Mean PDC ± standard deviation was 0.85 ± 0.26 and 0.75 ± 0.31, respectively (P < 0.001). Patients that received the intervention were more likely to persist in their OAC therapy at 1 year (aOR 2.42, 95% CI 1.71-3.41; P < 0.001). Usual medical care was associated with more major (≥3 months) treatment gaps (aOR 2.39, 95% CI 1.76-3.26; P < 0.001). Clinical events over a median follow-up period of 2 years did not differ among treatment groups.

Conclusion: In patients receiving OAC therapy for non-valvular AF, a multilevel motivational intervention significantly improved medication adherence and rate of therapy persistence, and reduced major gaps in treatment. No significant impact on clinical outcomes was observed.

Trial registration number: NCT02941978.

动机性访谈支持非瓣膜性心房颤动患者口服抗凝依从性(MISOAC-AF):一项随机临床试验
目的:我们旨在评估教育、动机干预对非瓣膜性心房颤动(AF)患者口服抗凝治疗(OAC)依从性的影响。方法和结果:接受OAC治疗的非瓣膜性房颤住院患者被随机分配到常规医疗护理或积极干预,包括动机性访谈和针对药物依从性的量身定制咨询。主要研究结果是1年的OAC依从性,根据OAC方案的覆盖天数比例(PDC)进行评估,并通过全国处方索赔登记册进行评估。次要结局包括OAC持续率、治疗间隙和临床事件。随机抽取1009例患者,干预组500例,对照组509例。在1年的随访中,干预组中77.2%(386/500)的患者是依从性的(PDC > 80%),对照组为55%(280/509)[校正优势比(aOR) 2.84, 95%可信区间(CI) 2.14-3.75;结论:在接受OAC治疗的非瓣膜性房颤患者中,多层次动机干预显著提高了药物依从性和治疗持续率,并减少了治疗的主要间隙。未观察到对临床结果的显著影响。试验注册号:NCT02941978。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信