How team averages in authentic living and perspective-taking personalities relate to team information elaboration and team performance.

The Journal of applied psychology Pub Date : 2021-03-01 Epub Date: 2020-04-23 DOI:10.1037/apl0000499
Hannes Leroy, Inga J Hoever, Kathleen Vangronsvelt, Anja Van den Broeck
{"title":"How team averages in authentic living and perspective-taking personalities relate to team information elaboration and team performance.","authors":"Hannes Leroy,&nbsp;Inga J Hoever,&nbsp;Kathleen Vangronsvelt,&nbsp;Anja Van den Broeck","doi":"10.1037/apl0000499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Is it wise to be authentic, that is, to express your inner thoughts and feelings, in a team context? Although authenticity can be argued to benefit teamwork as authentic team members contribute their unique perspectives, it can also hinder teamwork if those unique perspectives are not heard and integrated. Using theory on groups as information processors, we propose that when team members both contribute their own unique perspectives (team mean authentic living), and try to understand each other's contributions (team mean perspective taking), a process of information elaboration occurs at the team level, which in turn leads to team performance. Study 1 tested these assumptions in 67 teams of students (<i>N</i> = 247), whereas Study 2 used 37 teams of employees (<i>N</i> = 194). Results support the hypothesized interaction between team mean authentic living and team mean perspective taking on team information elaboration such that the effects were positive when perspective taking was high but negative when it was low. In terms of team performance, although team information elaboration consistently predicted team performance in both studies, Study 1 could not confirm the hypothesized indirect effects, whereas Study 2 confirmed only the hypothesized positive indirect effect. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":169654,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of applied psychology","volume":" ","pages":"364-376"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of applied psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Is it wise to be authentic, that is, to express your inner thoughts and feelings, in a team context? Although authenticity can be argued to benefit teamwork as authentic team members contribute their unique perspectives, it can also hinder teamwork if those unique perspectives are not heard and integrated. Using theory on groups as information processors, we propose that when team members both contribute their own unique perspectives (team mean authentic living), and try to understand each other's contributions (team mean perspective taking), a process of information elaboration occurs at the team level, which in turn leads to team performance. Study 1 tested these assumptions in 67 teams of students (N = 247), whereas Study 2 used 37 teams of employees (N = 194). Results support the hypothesized interaction between team mean authentic living and team mean perspective taking on team information elaboration such that the effects were positive when perspective taking was high but negative when it was low. In terms of team performance, although team information elaboration consistently predicted team performance in both studies, Study 1 could not confirm the hypothesized indirect effects, whereas Study 2 confirmed only the hypothesized positive indirect effect. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

真实生活和换位思考个性中的团队平均水平如何与团队信息阐述和团队绩效相关。
在团队中表现真实,也就是表达你内心的想法和感受是明智的吗?虽然真实性可以被认为有利于团队合作,因为真实的团队成员贡献了他们独特的观点,但如果这些独特的观点没有被倾听和整合,它也会阻碍团队合作。利用群体作为信息处理者的理论,我们提出,当团队成员都贡献了自己独特的观点(团队意味着真实的生活),并试图理解彼此的贡献(团队意味着观点采纳)时,在团队层面上发生了一个信息细化的过程,这反过来又会导致团队绩效。研究1在67个学生团队(N = 247)中测试了这些假设,而研究2使用了37个员工团队(N = 194)。研究结果支持了团队平均真实生活与团队平均视角对团队信息阐述的交互作用假设,即当视角高时,团队平均视角对团队信息阐述的影响为正,当视角低时,团队平均视角对团队信息阐述的影响为负。在团队绩效方面,虽然两项研究都一致地预测了团队绩效,但研究1不能证实假设的间接效应,而研究2只证实了假设的积极间接效应。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信