Raising and stabilization phase of the sit-to-stand movement better discriminate healthy elderly adults from young subjects: a pilot cross-sectional study.
{"title":"Raising and stabilization phase of the sit-to-stand movement better discriminate healthy elderly adults from young subjects: a pilot cross-sectional study.","authors":"Leonardo Piano, Tommaso Geri, Marco Testa","doi":"10.1186/s40945-020-00078-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The sit-to-stand (STS) test is usually included in the clinical assessment of balance and its instrumented analysis may support clinicians in objectively assessing the risk of falling. The aim of the present study was to assess if kinetic parameters of STS collected using a force platform, with particular focus on the raising and stabilization phase, could discriminate between young and older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four adults (age ranging from 18 to 65 years old) and 28 elderly adults (older than 65 years old) performed STS on a force platform. Data on ground reaction forces, sway, displacement and velocity of the center of pressure were gathered during the raising and the stabilization phases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>elderly subjects showed significant greater global sway (146.97 vs 119.85; <i>p</i> < 0.05) and a higher velocity (vs 40.03 vs 34.35 mm/s; <i>p</i> < 0.05) of execution of STS. Between-group comparisons highlighted a greater postural sway in the raising phase (21.63 vs 13.58; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and a doubled sway during the stabilization phase (12.38 vs 4.98; <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The analysis of STS performed on a force platform provides further information about the age-specific pattern of STS execution. The stabilization phase of STS seems to be the more challenging for functional independent older adults and should be considered during balance assessment.Further studies are needed to confirm findings and improve generalizability of this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":72290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physiotherapy","volume":"10 ","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40945-020-00078-8","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40945-020-00078-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Abstract
Background: The sit-to-stand (STS) test is usually included in the clinical assessment of balance and its instrumented analysis may support clinicians in objectively assessing the risk of falling. The aim of the present study was to assess if kinetic parameters of STS collected using a force platform, with particular focus on the raising and stabilization phase, could discriminate between young and older adults.
Methods: Twenty-four adults (age ranging from 18 to 65 years old) and 28 elderly adults (older than 65 years old) performed STS on a force platform. Data on ground reaction forces, sway, displacement and velocity of the center of pressure were gathered during the raising and the stabilization phases.
Results: elderly subjects showed significant greater global sway (146.97 vs 119.85; p < 0.05) and a higher velocity (vs 40.03 vs 34.35 mm/s; p < 0.05) of execution of STS. Between-group comparisons highlighted a greater postural sway in the raising phase (21.63 vs 13.58; p < 0.001) and a doubled sway during the stabilization phase (12.38 vs 4.98; p < 0.001).
Conclusions: The analysis of STS performed on a force platform provides further information about the age-specific pattern of STS execution. The stabilization phase of STS seems to be the more challenging for functional independent older adults and should be considered during balance assessment.Further studies are needed to confirm findings and improve generalizability of this study.
背景:STS测试通常包括在平衡的临床评估中,其仪器分析可以支持临床医生客观评估跌倒的风险。本研究的目的是评估使用力平台收集的STS动力学参数,特别是关注上升和稳定阶段,是否可以区分年轻人和老年人。方法:24名成人(18 ~ 65岁)和28名老年人(65岁以上)在用力平台上进行STS。在上升和稳定阶段收集了地面反作用力、摇摆、位移和压力中心速度的数据。结果:老年受试者表现出更大的整体摇摆(146.97 vs 119.85;结论:在力平台上执行STS的分析提供了关于STS执行的年龄特异性模式的进一步信息。STS的稳定阶段似乎对功能独立的老年人更具挑战性,应在平衡评估中考虑。需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现,并提高本研究的普遍性。