Far Side Impact Injury Threshold Recommendations Based on 6 Paired WorldSID / Post-Mortem Human Subjects Tests.

Q2 Medicine
Philippe Petit, Xavier Trosseille, Jérome Uriot, David Poulard, Pascal Potier, Pascal Baudrit, Sabine Compigne, Masato Kunisada, Kenji Tsurui
{"title":"Far Side Impact Injury Threshold Recommendations Based on 6 Paired WorldSID / Post-Mortem Human Subjects Tests.","authors":"Philippe Petit,&nbsp;Xavier Trosseille,&nbsp;Jérome Uriot,&nbsp;David Poulard,&nbsp;Pascal Potier,&nbsp;Pascal Baudrit,&nbsp;Sabine Compigne,&nbsp;Masato Kunisada,&nbsp;Kenji Tsurui","doi":"10.4271/2019-22-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Far side has been identified in the literature as a potential cause of numerous injuries and fatalities. Euro NCAP developed a far side test protocol to be performed to assess adult protection. A monitoring phase was undertaken between January 2018 and December 2019, and the far side assessment will become part of the rating for all vehicles launched in 2020 onward. A test buck was developed and 6 paired WorldSID / Post Mortem Human Subjects (PMHS) were subjected to the test protocol proposed by Euro NCAP to contribute to the development of limits. The buck consisted of a rigid seat and a rigid central console covered with 50 mm of Ethafoam TM 180 with a density of 16 kg/m3. The buck was mounted on the sled with an angle of 75° between the X axis of the vehicle and the X axis of the sled. The peak head excursion was compared between PMHS and the WorldSID dummy. It was found reasonably similar. However, the dummy repeatability was found to be poor. Out of 6 tests conducted on 6 PMHS, 2 specimens sustained AIS3 and, 3 specimens AIS2 cervical spine injuries, 3 specimens sustained AIS3, 1 AIS2 and 1 AIS1 thoracic injuries, and 2 specimens sustained AIS2 abdominal injuries. The peak values recorded on the dummy according to the Euro NCAP protocol were compared with the injury assessments of the PMHS tests. In the configuration used, which includes a central console, the hard thorax injury prediction was found to be excellent. For the neck injury prediction, the data were merged with similar results available in the literature and an Injury Risk Curve was proposed as a derivative from the curve published by Mertz et al. (2003) for neck extension.</p>","PeriodicalId":35289,"journal":{"name":"Stapp car crash journal","volume":"63 ","pages":"127-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stapp car crash journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-22-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Far side has been identified in the literature as a potential cause of numerous injuries and fatalities. Euro NCAP developed a far side test protocol to be performed to assess adult protection. A monitoring phase was undertaken between January 2018 and December 2019, and the far side assessment will become part of the rating for all vehicles launched in 2020 onward. A test buck was developed and 6 paired WorldSID / Post Mortem Human Subjects (PMHS) were subjected to the test protocol proposed by Euro NCAP to contribute to the development of limits. The buck consisted of a rigid seat and a rigid central console covered with 50 mm of Ethafoam TM 180 with a density of 16 kg/m3. The buck was mounted on the sled with an angle of 75° between the X axis of the vehicle and the X axis of the sled. The peak head excursion was compared between PMHS and the WorldSID dummy. It was found reasonably similar. However, the dummy repeatability was found to be poor. Out of 6 tests conducted on 6 PMHS, 2 specimens sustained AIS3 and, 3 specimens AIS2 cervical spine injuries, 3 specimens sustained AIS3, 1 AIS2 and 1 AIS1 thoracic injuries, and 2 specimens sustained AIS2 abdominal injuries. The peak values recorded on the dummy according to the Euro NCAP protocol were compared with the injury assessments of the PMHS tests. In the configuration used, which includes a central console, the hard thorax injury prediction was found to be excellent. For the neck injury prediction, the data were merged with similar results available in the literature and an Injury Risk Curve was proposed as a derivative from the curve published by Mertz et al. (2003) for neck extension.

基于6对WorldSID /死后人类受试者试验的远侧碰撞损伤阈值建议。
在文献中,远侧已被确定为许多伤害和死亡的潜在原因。欧洲NCAP制定了一项评估成人保护的远侧测试方案。2018年1月至2019年12月期间进行了监测阶段,远端评估将成为2020年以后推出的所有车辆评级的一部分。开发了一个测试buck,并对6对WorldSID / Post - Mortem Human Subjects (PMHS)进行了Euro NCAP提出的测试方案,以促进限值的制定。buck由一个刚性座椅和一个刚性中控台组成,上面覆盖了50mm密度为16 kg/m3的Ethafoam TM 180。buck以车辆X轴与雪橇X轴之间的75°夹角安装在雪橇上。比较PMHS与WorldSID假人的峰头偏移。人们发现它们相当相似。然而,假人的重复性很差。6例PMHS共进行6次试验,其中2例为AIS3型,3例为AIS2型颈椎损伤,3例为AIS3型,1例为AIS2型,1例为AIS1型胸椎损伤,2例为AIS2型腹部损伤。根据欧洲NCAP方案在假人上记录的峰值与PMHS试验的损伤评估进行比较。在使用的配置中,包括一个中控台,硬胸损伤预测被发现是很好的。对于颈部损伤预测,将数据与文献中类似的结果合并,并提出了损伤风险曲线,作为Mertz等人(2003)发表的颈部伸展曲线的导数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stapp car crash journal
Stapp car crash journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信