Handrim forces during wheelies performance in able-bodied and SCI subjects.

The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine Pub Date : 2021-11-01 Epub Date: 2020-04-16 DOI:10.1080/10790268.2020.1747893
Didier Pradon, Claire Marchiori, Nicolas Roche, Eric Watelain
{"title":"Handrim forces during wheelies performance in able-bodied and SCI subjects.","authors":"Didier Pradon,&nbsp;Claire Marchiori,&nbsp;Nicolas Roche,&nbsp;Eric Watelain","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2020.1747893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Context:</b> Manual wheelchair users must be able to carry out wheelies in order to tackle obstacles in the outdoor environment. To date, no studies have compared balance variables and forces exerted on the handrim during a stationary wheelie between able bodied and spinal cord injury subjects.<b>Objectives:</b> To compare the distribution of forces applied to the handrim and the center of pressure displacement during a stationary wheelie between able-bodied (AB) subjects and manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury (SCI).<b>Design:</b> Prospective experimental study.<b>Setting:</b> A university hospital laboratory.<b>Participants:</b> 27 participants (14 AB and 13 SCI).<b>Outcome Measure:</b> Each participant performed 3 stationary wheelies of 60 s duration using a wheelchair equipped with an instrumented wheel. Two force platforms were used to calculate the displacement of the center of pressure (DCOP).<b>Results:</b> Median group DCOP amplitude in the anteroposterior axis was smaller and less variable in the AB (19.6 mm [8.1,49.6]) than the SCI (14.9 mm [7.6,141.1]) group. Forces applied to the handrim only differed significantly between the AB (6 N [-13.8,16.6]) and SCI groups (2.7 N [-12.1 21.9]) in the posteroanterior axis.<b>Conclusions:</b> The results showed that the participants with SCI exerted greater PA forces on the handrim, moreover, the direction of force was opposite to that of the AB group, suggesting that the SCI group used a proactive balance strategy while the AB group used a retroactive strategy. The results suggest that the direction of force applied should be considered when teaching individuals to perform wheelies.</p>","PeriodicalId":501560,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"985-991"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10790268.2020.1747893","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2020.1747893","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/4/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Manual wheelchair users must be able to carry out wheelies in order to tackle obstacles in the outdoor environment. To date, no studies have compared balance variables and forces exerted on the handrim during a stationary wheelie between able bodied and spinal cord injury subjects.Objectives: To compare the distribution of forces applied to the handrim and the center of pressure displacement during a stationary wheelie between able-bodied (AB) subjects and manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury (SCI).Design: Prospective experimental study.Setting: A university hospital laboratory.Participants: 27 participants (14 AB and 13 SCI).Outcome Measure: Each participant performed 3 stationary wheelies of 60 s duration using a wheelchair equipped with an instrumented wheel. Two force platforms were used to calculate the displacement of the center of pressure (DCOP).Results: Median group DCOP amplitude in the anteroposterior axis was smaller and less variable in the AB (19.6 mm [8.1,49.6]) than the SCI (14.9 mm [7.6,141.1]) group. Forces applied to the handrim only differed significantly between the AB (6 N [-13.8,16.6]) and SCI groups (2.7 N [-12.1 21.9]) in the posteroanterior axis.Conclusions: The results showed that the participants with SCI exerted greater PA forces on the handrim, moreover, the direction of force was opposite to that of the AB group, suggesting that the SCI group used a proactive balance strategy while the AB group used a retroactive strategy. The results suggest that the direction of force applied should be considered when teaching individuals to perform wheelies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

健全人及脊髓损伤受试者车轮动作时的Handrim力。
背景:手动轮椅使用者必须能够进行轮滑,以便在室外环境中解决障碍。到目前为止,还没有研究比较身体健全者和脊髓损伤者在固定轮毂运动时的平衡变量和施加在手环上的力。目的:比较健全人(AB)和脊髓损伤的手动轮椅使用者(SCI)在固定轮式运动中施加于手环和压力位移中心的力的分布。设计:前瞻性实验研究。地点:大学医院实验室。受试者:27例(AB 14例,SCI 13例)。结果测量:每个参与者使用配有辅助轮的轮椅进行3次持续60秒的固定轮转。采用两个力平台计算压力中心位移(DCOP)。结果:AB组DCOP振幅中位数(19.6 mm[8.1,49.6])小于SCI组(14.9 mm[7.6141.1]),且前后轴变化较小。在AB组(6 N[-13.8,16.6])和SCI组(2.7 N[-12.1 21.9])之间,施加于手缘的力在后前轴上有显著差异。结论:结果表明,脊髓损伤组对掌柄施加更大的PA力,且力的方向与AB组相反,表明SCI组采用主动平衡策略,而AB组采用追溯平衡策略。结果表明,在指导个体进行轮滑动作时应考虑施力方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信