Endoscopic posterior cordotomy for treatment of dyspnea due to vocal fold immobility.

IF 2.3
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine Pub Date : 2020-04-06 eCollection Date: 2020-01-28 DOI:10.4081/mrm.2020.35
Narin Nard Carmel-Neiderman, Max Chason, Anat Wengier, Oshri Wasserzug, Oren Cavel, Gilad Horowitz, Barak Ringel, Anton Warshavsky, Yael Oestreicher-Kedem
{"title":"Endoscopic posterior cordotomy for treatment of dyspnea due to vocal fold immobility.","authors":"Narin Nard Carmel-Neiderman,&nbsp;Max Chason,&nbsp;Anat Wengier,&nbsp;Oshri Wasserzug,&nbsp;Oren Cavel,&nbsp;Gilad Horowitz,&nbsp;Barak Ringel,&nbsp;Anton Warshavsky,&nbsp;Yael Oestreicher-Kedem","doi":"10.4081/mrm.2020.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Several surgical procedures have been described for the treatment of respiratory distress secondary to vocal fold immobility (VFI), but the contribution of posterior cordotomy (PC) to tracheostomy weaning or prevention has not been studied in depth, particularly in the acute setting. The objective of this study was to show the effectiveness of PC to relieve dyspnea, prevent the need for tracheostomy, and enable decannulation in patients with VFI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study and reviewed the medical records of all patients whose dyspnea warranted surgical intervention from January 2013 to January 2018. Data were retrieved on epidemiology, etiology, and duration of VFI, tracheostomy dependence, success in decannulation from tracheostomy or respiratory relief, number of procedures until decannulation, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve suitable patients were identified of whom eleven had bilateral VFI and one had unilateral VFI. Five were tracheostomy-dependent. Ten patients underwent unilateral PC, and two patients underwent bilateral PC. All the patients experienced respiratory relief, eleven after a single PC and one after two PCs. All tracheostomy-dependent patients were decannulated. The mean follow-up after PC was 24.55 months during which none of the patients required a re-tracheostomy and three patients required revision of the PC. There were no surgical complications. Postoperatively, eight patients (67%) experienced a breathy voice and three patients (25%) had dysphagia for fluids. No patient had aspiration pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We conclude that PC is an easy, safe, and effective procedure for tracheostomy weaning and respiratory relief in patients with VFI. A revision PC may be indicated in some patients. A breathy voice is to be expected, and a few patients will experience dysphagia to fluids that may be addressed by instructing the patient to use a fluid thickener and take small sips.</p>","PeriodicalId":49031,"journal":{"name":"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/09/52/mrm-15-1-35.PMC7154604.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/mrm.2020.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Several surgical procedures have been described for the treatment of respiratory distress secondary to vocal fold immobility (VFI), but the contribution of posterior cordotomy (PC) to tracheostomy weaning or prevention has not been studied in depth, particularly in the acute setting. The objective of this study was to show the effectiveness of PC to relieve dyspnea, prevent the need for tracheostomy, and enable decannulation in patients with VFI.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study and reviewed the medical records of all patients whose dyspnea warranted surgical intervention from January 2013 to January 2018. Data were retrieved on epidemiology, etiology, and duration of VFI, tracheostomy dependence, success in decannulation from tracheostomy or respiratory relief, number of procedures until decannulation, and complications.

Results: Twelve suitable patients were identified of whom eleven had bilateral VFI and one had unilateral VFI. Five were tracheostomy-dependent. Ten patients underwent unilateral PC, and two patients underwent bilateral PC. All the patients experienced respiratory relief, eleven after a single PC and one after two PCs. All tracheostomy-dependent patients were decannulated. The mean follow-up after PC was 24.55 months during which none of the patients required a re-tracheostomy and three patients required revision of the PC. There were no surgical complications. Postoperatively, eight patients (67%) experienced a breathy voice and three patients (25%) had dysphagia for fluids. No patient had aspiration pneumonia.

Conclusions: We conclude that PC is an easy, safe, and effective procedure for tracheostomy weaning and respiratory relief in patients with VFI. A revision PC may be indicated in some patients. A breathy voice is to be expected, and a few patients will experience dysphagia to fluids that may be addressed by instructing the patient to use a fluid thickener and take small sips.

Abstract Image

内镜下后声带切开术治疗声带不动所致呼吸困难。
介绍:已有几种外科手术方法用于治疗声带不动(VFI)继发的呼吸窘迫,但后声带切开术(PC)对气管切开术脱机或预防的贡献尚未深入研究,特别是在急性情况下。本研究的目的是显示PC在缓解VFI患者呼吸困难、防止气管切开术和实现脱管方面的有效性。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性研究,并回顾了2013年1月至2018年1月期间所有需要手术干预的呼吸困难患者的病历。资料包括流行病学、病因学、VFI持续时间、气管造口术依赖、气管造口术或呼吸缓解后脱管成功、脱管前的手术次数和并发症。结果:12例患者中11例为双侧VFI, 1例为单侧VFI。5例依赖气管切开术。10例患者行单侧PC, 2例患者行双侧PC。所有患者呼吸均有所缓解,其中11例在单次PC后,1例在两次PC后。所有依赖气管造口术的患者均行气管插管。术后平均随访24.55个月,无患者需要再次气管切开术,3例患者需要修改气管切开术。无手术并发症。术后,8名患者(67%)出现呼吸声,3名患者(25%)出现吞咽困难。无患者发生吸入性肺炎。结论:我们认为PC是一种简单、安全、有效的方法,可用于气管切开术和VFI患者的脱机和呼吸缓解。一些患者可能需要复查PC。可能会有呼吸声,少数患者会遇到液体吞咽困难,这可以通过指导患者使用液体增稠剂和小口服用来解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine is the official journal of the Italian Respiratory Society - Società Italiana di Pneumologia (IRS/SIP). The journal publishes on all aspects of respiratory medicine and related fields, with a particular focus on interdisciplinary and translational research. The interdisciplinary nature of the journal provides a unique opportunity for researchers, clinicians and healthcare professionals across specialties to collaborate and exchange information. The journal provides a high visibility platform for the publication and dissemination of top quality original scientific articles, reviews and important position papers documenting clinical and experimental advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信