Outcome of Biomedical Waste Management Training Among Staff Nurses of Primary Health Centers of Hassan District.

IF 1.3 Q2 Social Sciences
Venkatesh Gonibeedu, M Sundar, H C Santhosh, D Mallikarjuna Swamy
{"title":"Outcome of Biomedical Waste Management Training Among Staff Nurses of Primary Health Centers of Hassan District.","authors":"Venkatesh Gonibeedu,&nbsp;M Sundar,&nbsp;H C Santhosh,&nbsp;D Mallikarjuna Swamy","doi":"10.1177/0272684X20915380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Inadequate biomedical waste management not only poses significant risk of infection due to pathogens such as HIV and Hepatitis B and C virus but also carries the risk of water, air, and soil pollution thereby adversely affecting the environment and community at large. Therefore, the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare commissioned implementation of an Infection Management and Environment Plan (IMEP) in health-care facilities. Hence, this study is undertaken to assess the knowledge, attitude, practice, and gaps in implementing the biomedical waste management practices at the primary health-care facilities.<b>Methodology:</b> A cross-sectional study was conducted among the Primary Health Centers of Hassan District. Details of knowledge, attitude, and practice of biomedical waste management were collected through observation, staff interview, and record review on the predesigned questionnaire. A score of 0, 1, and 2 was given for <i>noncompliant</i> (0), <i>partially compliant</i> (1), and <i>fully compliant</i> (2), respectively, based on the compliance. A scoring system was devised to evaluate the effectiveness of training as <i>good</i>, <i>average</i>, and <i>poor</i>. A score of >70 was considered as <i>good</i>, 50 to 70 as <i>average</i>, and <50 as <i>poor</i>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean efficacy score was 63; knowledge was good with a score of 74, attitude was average with a score of 63, and practice was also average with a score of 54.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a need for retraining of all the staff and strict supportive supervision by the district health authorities to ease the implementation requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":54184,"journal":{"name":"International Quarterly of Community Health Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0272684X20915380","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Quarterly of Community Health Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0272684X20915380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: Inadequate biomedical waste management not only poses significant risk of infection due to pathogens such as HIV and Hepatitis B and C virus but also carries the risk of water, air, and soil pollution thereby adversely affecting the environment and community at large. Therefore, the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare commissioned implementation of an Infection Management and Environment Plan (IMEP) in health-care facilities. Hence, this study is undertaken to assess the knowledge, attitude, practice, and gaps in implementing the biomedical waste management practices at the primary health-care facilities.Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted among the Primary Health Centers of Hassan District. Details of knowledge, attitude, and practice of biomedical waste management were collected through observation, staff interview, and record review on the predesigned questionnaire. A score of 0, 1, and 2 was given for noncompliant (0), partially compliant (1), and fully compliant (2), respectively, based on the compliance. A scoring system was devised to evaluate the effectiveness of training as good, average, and poor. A score of >70 was considered as good, 50 to 70 as average, and <50 as poor.

Results: The mean efficacy score was 63; knowledge was good with a score of 74, attitude was average with a score of 63, and practice was also average with a score of 54.

Conclusion: There is a need for retraining of all the staff and strict supportive supervision by the district health authorities to ease the implementation requirements.

哈桑区初级保健中心护士生物医学废物管理培训的效果。
导言:不适当的生物医学废物管理不仅会造成艾滋病毒、乙型和丙型肝炎病毒等病原体感染的重大风险,而且还会造成水、空气和土壤污染的风险,从而对整个环境和社区产生不利影响。因此,卫生和家庭福利部委托在保健设施中实施一项感染管理和环境计划。因此,进行这项研究是为了评估初级保健设施在实施生物医学废物管理做法方面的知识、态度、做法和差距。方法:在哈桑区初级保健中心进行了一项横断面研究。通过观察、工作人员访谈和对预先设计的问卷的记录审查,收集生物医学废物管理的知识、态度和实践细节。不服从(0)、部分服从(1)和完全服从(2)的评分分别为0、1和2。设计了一个评分系统来评估训练的效果,分为好、一般和差。分数大于70分为好,50到70分为一般,为差。结果:平均疗效评分为63分;知识良好,得分74分;态度一般,得分63分;实践也一般,得分54分。结论:有必要对所有工作人员进行再培训,并由区卫生主管部门进行严格的支持性监督,以缓解实施要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Quarterly of Community Health Education
International Quarterly of Community Health Education PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The International Quarterly of Community Health Education is committed to publishing applied research, policy and case studies dealing with community health education and its relationship to social change. Since 1981, this rigorously peer-referred Journal has contained a wide selection of material in readable style and format by contributors who are not only authorities in their field, but can also write with vigor, clarity, and occasionally with humor. Since its introduction the Journal has considered all manuscripts, especially encouraging stimulating articles which manage to combine maximum readability with scholarly standards.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信