Artificial neural network to guide intracorneal ring segments implantation for keratoconus treatment: a pilot study.

Eye and vision (London, England) Pub Date : 2020-04-09 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40662-020-00184-5
Chiara Fariselli, Alfredo Vega-Estrada, Francisco Arnalich-Montiel, Jorge L Alio
{"title":"Artificial neural network to guide intracorneal ring segments implantation for keratoconus treatment: a pilot study.","authors":"Chiara Fariselli,&nbsp;Alfredo Vega-Estrada,&nbsp;Francisco Arnalich-Montiel,&nbsp;Jorge L Alio","doi":"10.1186/s40662-020-00184-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To analyze the clinical results of an artificial neural network (ANN) that has been processed in order to improve the predictability of intracorneal ring segments (ICRS) implantation in keratoconus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, comparative, nonrandomized, pilot, clinical study included a cohort of 20 keratoconic eyes implanted with intracorneal ring segments KeraRing (Mediphacos, Belo Horizonte, Brazil) using the ANN (ANN group) and 20 keratoconic eyes implanted with KeraRing using the manufacturer's nomograms (nomogram group). Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) (visual acuity is expressed in decimal value and in LogMAR value in brackets), manifest refraction, corneal topography, tomography, aberrometry, pachymetry and volume analysis (Sirius System. CSO, Firenze, Italy) were performed during the preoperative visit; and the two groups, ANN group and nomogram group, did not differ significantly preoperatively in all of the parameters evaluated. These preoperative values were compared with the results obtained at the third-month visit. Mann-Whitney test and Wilcoxon test were used for the statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The spherical equivalent and the keratometric values decreased significantly in both groups. The CDVA improved from 0.60 ± 0.23 (0.22 LogMAR) pre-operatively to 0.73 ± 0.21 (0.14 LogMAR) post-operatively in the ANN group (<i>p</i> < 0.005), and from 0.54 ± 0.19 (0.27 LogMAR) pre-operatively to 0.62 ± 0.19 (0.21 LogMAR) post-operatively in the nomogram group (<i>p</i> < 0.01), with statistically significant difference between the two groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05), being better in the ANN group. Coma-like aberrations decreased significantly in the ANN group, while in the nomogram group they did not change significantly, but no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ANN to guide ICRS provides an increase in the visual acuity, reduction in the spherical equivalent and improvement in the optical quality of keratoconus patients. ANN gives better results when compared with the manufacturer's nomograms in terms of better corrected vision and reduction of the coma-like aberrations. The constant inclusion of new cases will make the predictability of ANN increasingly better as the software finetunes its learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":520624,"journal":{"name":"Eye and vision (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40662-020-00184-5","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye and vision (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-020-00184-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Background: To analyze the clinical results of an artificial neural network (ANN) that has been processed in order to improve the predictability of intracorneal ring segments (ICRS) implantation in keratoconus.

Methods: This retrospective, comparative, nonrandomized, pilot, clinical study included a cohort of 20 keratoconic eyes implanted with intracorneal ring segments KeraRing (Mediphacos, Belo Horizonte, Brazil) using the ANN (ANN group) and 20 keratoconic eyes implanted with KeraRing using the manufacturer's nomograms (nomogram group). Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) (visual acuity is expressed in decimal value and in LogMAR value in brackets), manifest refraction, corneal topography, tomography, aberrometry, pachymetry and volume analysis (Sirius System. CSO, Firenze, Italy) were performed during the preoperative visit; and the two groups, ANN group and nomogram group, did not differ significantly preoperatively in all of the parameters evaluated. These preoperative values were compared with the results obtained at the third-month visit. Mann-Whitney test and Wilcoxon test were used for the statistical analyses.

Results: The spherical equivalent and the keratometric values decreased significantly in both groups. The CDVA improved from 0.60 ± 0.23 (0.22 LogMAR) pre-operatively to 0.73 ± 0.21 (0.14 LogMAR) post-operatively in the ANN group (p < 0.005), and from 0.54 ± 0.19 (0.27 LogMAR) pre-operatively to 0.62 ± 0.19 (0.21 LogMAR) post-operatively in the nomogram group (p < 0.01), with statistically significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05), being better in the ANN group. Coma-like aberrations decreased significantly in the ANN group, while in the nomogram group they did not change significantly, but no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups.

Conclusions: ANN to guide ICRS provides an increase in the visual acuity, reduction in the spherical equivalent and improvement in the optical quality of keratoconus patients. ANN gives better results when compared with the manufacturer's nomograms in terms of better corrected vision and reduction of the coma-like aberrations. The constant inclusion of new cases will make the predictability of ANN increasingly better as the software finetunes its learning.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

人工神经网络指导圆锥角膜内环段植入术的初步研究。
背景:分析人工神经网络(ANN)的临床结果,以提高圆锥角膜内环段植入术的可预测性。方法:这项回顾性、对比性、非随机、先导性临床研究包括20只使用人工神经网络植入角膜内环形段KeraRing (Mediphacos, Belo Horizonte, Brazil)的角膜移植眼(人工神经网络组)和20只使用制造商图植入KeraRing的角膜移植眼(图组)。未校正距离视力(UDVA)、校正距离视力(CDVA)(视力以十进制表示,括号内为LogMAR值)、明显屈光、角膜地形图、断层扫描、像差测量、厚视测量和体积分析(Sirius System)。CSO, Firenze, Italy)在术前访视时进行;两组(ANN组和nomogram组)术前各项指标比较差异无统计学意义。这些术前值与第三个月访问时获得的结果进行比较。采用Mann-Whitney检验和Wilcoxon检验进行统计分析。结果:两组患者的球当量和角膜度数均明显降低。人工神经网络组CDVA由术前的0.60±0.23 (0.22 LogMAR)提高到术后的0.73±0.21 (0.14 LogMAR) (p p p)。结论:人工神经网络指导圆锥角膜患者的视灵敏度提高,球形当量降低,光学质量改善。在更好的矫正视力和减少彗差方面,人工神经网络与制造商的图相比较,给出了更好的结果。随着软件对其学习进行微调,不断纳入新案例将使人工神经网络的可预测性越来越好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信