Paramedic knowledge of infection control principles and standards in an Australian emergency medical system (EMS)

Ramon Z. Shaban RN, EMT-P BSc, BN, PGDipPH&TM, GradCertlnfCon, MEd, MCHPrac(Hons)
{"title":"Paramedic knowledge of infection control principles and standards in an Australian emergency medical system (EMS)","authors":"Ramon Z. Shaban RN, EMT-P BSc, BN, PGDipPH&TM, GradCertlnfCon, MEd, MCHPrac(Hons)","doi":"10.1071/HI06013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Infection control is an essential component of health care. The literature generally suggests that most health professionals’ knowledge of infection control principles and standards is poor or, at the very least, inadequate. There is a paucity of research examining paramedic knowledge of infection control principles and standards, particularly in the Australian pre-hospital context. The purpose of this study was to determine paramedic knowledge of standard infection control definitions and principles in an Australian emergency medical system (EMS).</p><p>A confidential and anonymous mail survey was distributed to all paramedics working in a State-wide Australian ambulance service (n=2274) A total of 1258 surveys were returned - a response rate of 55.3%. Only 46.2% (n=581) of the participants identified the correct components of the ’chain of infection’. Correct identification of the definition of ’nosocomial’ was made by 27,9% (n=347) of participants. Less than one-fifth (17.2%, n=217) of participants identified 'standards and additional precautions’ as the current system of infection control. Less than half (41.6%, n=523) of the sample correctly identified hand washing as the primary’ infection control strategy’ to prevent cross-infection.</p><p>This study suggests knowledge of fundamental principles and standards of infection control among paramedics is poor in this jurisdiction and recommends the introduction of comprehensive in-service education programmes in infection control. Further research is required to investigate if, and how, these results may be realised in practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":92877,"journal":{"name":"Australian infection control : official journal of the Australian Infection Control Association Inc","volume":"11 1","pages":"Pages 13-14, 16-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI06013","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian infection control : official journal of the Australian Infection Control Association Inc","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1329936016300530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Infection control is an essential component of health care. The literature generally suggests that most health professionals’ knowledge of infection control principles and standards is poor or, at the very least, inadequate. There is a paucity of research examining paramedic knowledge of infection control principles and standards, particularly in the Australian pre-hospital context. The purpose of this study was to determine paramedic knowledge of standard infection control definitions and principles in an Australian emergency medical system (EMS).

A confidential and anonymous mail survey was distributed to all paramedics working in a State-wide Australian ambulance service (n=2274) A total of 1258 surveys were returned - a response rate of 55.3%. Only 46.2% (n=581) of the participants identified the correct components of the ’chain of infection’. Correct identification of the definition of ’nosocomial’ was made by 27,9% (n=347) of participants. Less than one-fifth (17.2%, n=217) of participants identified 'standards and additional precautions’ as the current system of infection control. Less than half (41.6%, n=523) of the sample correctly identified hand washing as the primary’ infection control strategy’ to prevent cross-infection.

This study suggests knowledge of fundamental principles and standards of infection control among paramedics is poor in this jurisdiction and recommends the introduction of comprehensive in-service education programmes in infection control. Further research is required to investigate if, and how, these results may be realised in practice.

澳大利亚紧急医疗系统(EMS)感染控制原则和标准的护理人员知识
感染控制是卫生保健的一个重要组成部分。文献普遍表明,大多数卫生专业人员对感染控制原则和标准的了解很差,或者至少是不充分的。缺乏研究检查护理人员对感染控制原则和标准的知识,特别是在澳大利亚院前环境中。本研究的目的是确定澳大利亚紧急医疗系统(EMS)中护理人员对标准感染控制定义和原则的了解。一项保密和匿名的邮件调查被分发给澳大利亚全国救护车服务的所有护理人员(n=2274),共收到1258份调查,回复率为55.3%。只有46.2% (n=581)的参与者确定了“感染链”的正确组成部分。27.9% (n=347)的参与者正确识别了“医院性”的定义。不到五分之一(17.2%,n=217)的参与者将“标准和额外预防措施”确定为当前的感染控制系统。不到一半(41.6%,n=523)的样本正确地将洗手确定为预防交叉感染的主要“感染控制策略”。这项研究表明,在该辖区,护理人员对感染控制的基本原则和标准的了解很差,并建议引入全面的感染控制在职教育计划。需要进一步的研究来调查这些结果是否以及如何在实践中实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信