Social Determinants of Hookah Smoking in the United States.

Shervin Assari, Hamid Chalian, Mohsen Bazargan
{"title":"Social Determinants of Hookah Smoking in the United States.","authors":"Shervin Assari, Hamid Chalian, Mohsen Bazargan","doi":"10.29245/2578-2959/2020/1.1185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Educational attainment and income are two socioeconomic status indicators with strong protective effects against cigarette smoking. <i>Marginalization-related Diminished Returns</i>, however, refer to less than expected protective effects of socioeconomic status indicators for the members of the racial and ethnic minority groups, particularly Blacks and Hispanics, compared to non-Hispanic Whites.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Borrowing data from a nationally representative study in the US, this study tested whether racial and ethnic differences exist in the effects of educational attainment and poverty status on cigarette smoking of American adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study entered 28,329 adult participants of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH; 2013). Both educational attainment and poverty status were the independent variables. The dependent variable was current hookah smoking. Age, gender, and region were the covariates. Race and ethnicity were the effect modifiers (moderators).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, individuals with higher educational attainment were more likely to smoke a hookah. Individuals who lived out of poverty, however, had lower odds of current hookah smoking. Race and ethnicity both showed statistical interactions with both socioeconomic indicators suggesting that Blacks and Hispanics with high educational attainment and those who live out of poverty have disproportionately high odds of hookah smoking, compared to non-Hispanic Whites with high socioeconomic status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the United States, middle-class racial and ethnic minority people remain at higher risk of smoking hookah. As a result, we should expect a high tobacco burden in middle-class Black and Hispanic adults. We suggest that policymakers should not take an over-simplistic way and reduce the problem of race/ethnic inequalities in tobacco use to gaps in socioeconomic status between groups. Marginalization-related diminished returns generate tobacco disparities in higher socioeconomic status levels. Middle-class racial and ethnic minority people need extra support to stay healthy.</p>","PeriodicalId":73825,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mental health & clinical psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7153780/pdf/nihms-1579653.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mental health & clinical psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29245/2578-2959/2020/1.1185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Educational attainment and income are two socioeconomic status indicators with strong protective effects against cigarette smoking. Marginalization-related Diminished Returns, however, refer to less than expected protective effects of socioeconomic status indicators for the members of the racial and ethnic minority groups, particularly Blacks and Hispanics, compared to non-Hispanic Whites.

Aim: Borrowing data from a nationally representative study in the US, this study tested whether racial and ethnic differences exist in the effects of educational attainment and poverty status on cigarette smoking of American adults.

Methods: This cross-sectional study entered 28,329 adult participants of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH; 2013). Both educational attainment and poverty status were the independent variables. The dependent variable was current hookah smoking. Age, gender, and region were the covariates. Race and ethnicity were the effect modifiers (moderators).

Results: Overall, individuals with higher educational attainment were more likely to smoke a hookah. Individuals who lived out of poverty, however, had lower odds of current hookah smoking. Race and ethnicity both showed statistical interactions with both socioeconomic indicators suggesting that Blacks and Hispanics with high educational attainment and those who live out of poverty have disproportionately high odds of hookah smoking, compared to non-Hispanic Whites with high socioeconomic status.

Conclusions: In the United States, middle-class racial and ethnic minority people remain at higher risk of smoking hookah. As a result, we should expect a high tobacco burden in middle-class Black and Hispanic adults. We suggest that policymakers should not take an over-simplistic way and reduce the problem of race/ethnic inequalities in tobacco use to gaps in socioeconomic status between groups. Marginalization-related diminished returns generate tobacco disparities in higher socioeconomic status levels. Middle-class racial and ethnic minority people need extra support to stay healthy.

美国吸食胡克哈烟的社会决定因素。
背景:教育程度和收入这两个社会经济地位指标对吸烟有很强的保护作用。然而,与边缘化相关的收益递减指的是,与非西班牙裔白人相比,社会经济地位指标对少数种族和少数族裔群体成员,特别是黑人和西班牙裔成员的保护作用低于预期。目的:本研究借用美国一项具有全国代表性的研究的数据,检验美国成年人的教育程度和贫困状况对吸烟的影响是否存在种族和族裔差异:这项横断面研究对烟草与健康人口评估(PATH,2013 年)的 28329 名成年参与者进行了调查。教育程度和贫困状况均为自变量。因变量为目前是否吸食水烟。年龄、性别和地区为协变量。种族和民族是效应调节因子(调节器):总体而言,教育程度较高的人更有可能吸食水烟。然而,生活贫困的人目前吸食水烟的几率较低。种族和民族均与这两项社会经济指标存在统计学上的交互作用,这表明与社会经济地位高的非西班牙裔白人相比,教育程度高的黑人和西班牙裔以及生活贫困的人吸食水烟的几率要高得多:结论:在美国,中产阶级少数种族和少数民族吸食水烟的风险仍然较高。因此,我们认为中产阶级黑人和西班牙裔成年人的烟草负担较重。我们建议,政策制定者不应采取过于简单化的方式,将烟草使用中的种族/民族不平等问题简化为群体间社会经济地位的差距。与边缘化相关的回报减少导致了社会经济地位较高的人群在烟草使用上的差异。中产阶级的少数种族和民族需要额外的支持才能保持健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信