Treatment Patterns and Healthcare Resource Utilization among Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma in US Community Practices.

Q2 Medicine
Sarcoma Pub Date : 2020-02-28 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/1765319
Eric Nadler, Kathleen Aguilar, Chuck Wentworth, Marley Boyd, E Susan Amirian, Scott Barker, Pearl French, Thomas Wilson, Lisa M Hess
{"title":"Treatment Patterns and Healthcare Resource Utilization among Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma in US Community Practices.","authors":"Eric Nadler, Kathleen Aguilar, Chuck Wentworth, Marley Boyd, E Susan Amirian, Scott Barker, Pearl French, Thomas Wilson, Lisa M Hess","doi":"10.1155/2020/1765319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study was designed to describe demographic and clinical characteristics of patients diagnosed with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and to examine treatment and healthcare resource utilization patterns of this patient population in a United States (US) community-based oncology practice setting over time.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted within the US Oncology Network (USON). Patients were eligible if they were diagnosed with advanced or metastatic STS and were treated at a USON site between 01 July 2015 and 31 August 2018. Demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics were described for the overall study population. Comparisons between patients by time period (prior to and after October 2016) were evaluated using the <i>T</i> test for continuous variables and chi-squared test for categorical variables. Data were available for analysis through 31 August 2018.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Demographic and clinical characteristics of the eligible study cohort (<i>N</i> = 376) were similar between patients who initiated treatment before and after October 2016 (all <i>p</i> > 0.05). Forty-three unique regimens were observed in the first-line setting, with the predominant regimen (gemcitabine + docetaxel) received by 33.2% (<i>n</i> = 125) patients. Prior to October 2016, 45.4% of patients received first-line gemcitabine + docetaxel, while 29.0% received this regimen after October 2016.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While demographic and clinical characteristics were similar, treatment patterns changed in 2016. Future research should evaluate the impact of changing drug approvals and clinical trial results on future treatment patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":21431,"journal":{"name":"Sarcoma","volume":"2020 ","pages":"1765319"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068137/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sarcoma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1765319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study was designed to describe demographic and clinical characteristics of patients diagnosed with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and to examine treatment and healthcare resource utilization patterns of this patient population in a United States (US) community-based oncology practice setting over time.

Methods and materials: A retrospective observational study was conducted within the US Oncology Network (USON). Patients were eligible if they were diagnosed with advanced or metastatic STS and were treated at a USON site between 01 July 2015 and 31 August 2018. Demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics were described for the overall study population. Comparisons between patients by time period (prior to and after October 2016) were evaluated using the T test for continuous variables and chi-squared test for categorical variables. Data were available for analysis through 31 August 2018.

Results: Demographic and clinical characteristics of the eligible study cohort (N = 376) were similar between patients who initiated treatment before and after October 2016 (all p > 0.05). Forty-three unique regimens were observed in the first-line setting, with the predominant regimen (gemcitabine + docetaxel) received by 33.2% (n = 125) patients. Prior to October 2016, 45.4% of patients received first-line gemcitabine + docetaxel, while 29.0% received this regimen after October 2016.

Conclusions: While demographic and clinical characteristics were similar, treatment patterns changed in 2016. Future research should evaluate the impact of changing drug approvals and clinical trial results on future treatment patterns.

Abstract Image

美国社区诊所中晚期或转移性软组织肉瘤患者的治疗模式和医疗资源利用情况。
导言:本研究旨在描述被诊断为晚期或转移性软组织肉瘤(STS)患者的人口统计学和临床特征,并研究美国社区肿瘤学实践环境中该患者群体的治疗和医疗资源利用模式:在美国肿瘤网络(USON)内开展了一项回顾性观察研究。2015年7月1日至2018年8月31日期间,被诊断为晚期或转移性STS并在USON站点接受治疗的患者均符合条件。研究描述了总体研究人群的人口统计学、临床和治疗特征。对连续变量采用T检验,对分类变量采用卡方检验,对不同时间段(2016年10月之前和之后)的患者进行比较评估。数据可供分析至 2018 年 8 月 31 日:符合条件的研究队列(N = 376)中,2016 年 10 月之前和之后开始治疗的患者的人口统计学和临床特征相似(均 p > 0.05)。在一线治疗中观察到43种独特的治疗方案,33.2%(n = 125)的患者接受了最主要的治疗方案(吉西他滨+多西他赛)。在2016年10月之前,45.4%的患者接受了吉西他滨+多西他赛一线治疗,而在2016年10月之后,29.0%的患者接受了这一治疗方案:虽然人口统计学和临床特征相似,但治疗模式在2016年发生了变化。未来的研究应评估药物审批和临床试验结果的变化对未来治疗模式的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sarcoma
Sarcoma Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Sarcoma is dedicated to publishing papers covering all aspects of connective tissue oncology research. It brings together work from scientists and clinicians carrying out a broad range of research in this field, including the basic sciences, molecular biology and pathology and the clinical sciences of epidemiology, surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. High-quality papers concerning the entire range of bone and soft tissue sarcomas in both adults and children, including Kaposi"s sarcoma, are published as well as preclinical and animal studies. This journal provides a central forum for the description of advances in diagnosis, assessment and treatment of this rarely seen, but often mismanaged, group of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信