Methods for Hemolysis Interference Study in Laboratory Medicine - A Critical Review.

EJIFCC Pub Date : 2020-03-20 eCollection Date: 2020-03-01
Fernando Marques-Garcia
{"title":"Methods for Hemolysis Interference Study in Laboratory Medicine - A Critical Review.","authors":"Fernando Marques-Garcia","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hemolysis represents an important source of error associated with the pre-analytical phase. Improving the protocols for detection, measurement, management of the parameters affected by the interference, and differentiation between hemolysis <i>in vivo</i> and <i>in vitro</i>, would favor a personalized management of hemolysis by increasing patient safety. For this, it is essential to agree on the definition of \"hemolysis\". From this definition, a critical point is to establish cut-offs of hemolysis management for each analyte studied in the clinical laboratory. Thus, in this review, the main methods described in the literature developed for obtaining a hemolysate are grouped, that simulate in controlled laboratory protocols what happens with a hemolyzed sample of a patient. These methods are grouped into 3 categories according to their basis of lysing cells: freezing-thawing, osmotic shock and shear stress. In addition to development and improvement of methods for the study of hemolysis, it is necessary to carry out comparative studies to determine which one offers the best capabilities. Harmonization of the methods will allow to include them in working guidelines. All these strategies will allow to move from managing hemolysis on whole-sample basis to customize it analyte by analyte.</p>","PeriodicalId":193105,"journal":{"name":"EJIFCC","volume":"31 1","pages":"85-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f1/d5/ejifcc-31-85.PMC7109502.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJIFCC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hemolysis represents an important source of error associated with the pre-analytical phase. Improving the protocols for detection, measurement, management of the parameters affected by the interference, and differentiation between hemolysis in vivo and in vitro, would favor a personalized management of hemolysis by increasing patient safety. For this, it is essential to agree on the definition of "hemolysis". From this definition, a critical point is to establish cut-offs of hemolysis management for each analyte studied in the clinical laboratory. Thus, in this review, the main methods described in the literature developed for obtaining a hemolysate are grouped, that simulate in controlled laboratory protocols what happens with a hemolyzed sample of a patient. These methods are grouped into 3 categories according to their basis of lysing cells: freezing-thawing, osmotic shock and shear stress. In addition to development and improvement of methods for the study of hemolysis, it is necessary to carry out comparative studies to determine which one offers the best capabilities. Harmonization of the methods will allow to include them in working guidelines. All these strategies will allow to move from managing hemolysis on whole-sample basis to customize it analyte by analyte.

检验医学中溶血干扰研究方法综述。
溶血是与分析前阶段相关的一个重要误差来源。改进受干扰影响参数的检测、测量和管理方案,以及区分体内和体外溶血,将有助于通过提高患者安全性来实现溶血的个性化管理。为此,有必要就“溶血”的定义达成一致。从这个定义来看,关键的一点是为临床实验室研究的每种分析物建立溶血管理的截止点。因此,在本综述中,文献中描述的用于获得溶血的主要方法进行了分组,这些方法模拟了在受控实验室中对患者溶血样本的处理。这些方法根据其裂解细胞的基础分为3类:冻融法、渗透冲击法和剪切应力法。除了发展和改进溶血研究的方法外,有必要进行比较研究,以确定哪一种方法提供最好的能力。这些方法的统一将允许将它们纳入工作准则。所有这些策略将允许从管理溶血在整个样品的基础上,以定制分析物的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信