Can standardized measures provide helpful feedback about adult protective services substantiation? Pilot data from a short self-neglect assessment.

IF 1.6 2区 心理学 Q3 GERONTOLOGY
Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect Pub Date : 2020-06-01 Epub Date: 2020-04-03 DOI:10.1080/08946566.2020.1742837
Pi-Ju Liu, Sara K Stratton, Zachary Hass, Kendon J Conrad
{"title":"Can standardized measures provide helpful feedback about adult protective services substantiation? Pilot data from a short self-neglect assessment.","authors":"Pi-Ju Liu, Sara K Stratton, Zachary Hass, Kendon J Conrad","doi":"10.1080/08946566.2020.1742837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Can standardized assessment contribute to improving Adult Protective Services (APS) practice? In this exploratory study, San Francisco and Napa APS utilized a newly developed short self-neglect assessment to test how standardized measures provide information for substantiation decision making. Findings demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity for the short self-neglect assessment, and analyses revealed important issues that could improve practice. Review of outliers revealed: (1) problems using the assessment tool, (2) misunderstandings of APS procedures, and (3) struggles navigating the case management system. These revelations could all be easily addressed in training. Caseworker’s clinical judgment and experience also continue to have a place in complementing the use of the standardized assessment.","PeriodicalId":46983,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect","volume":"32 3","pages":"259-274"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08946566.2020.1742837","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08946566.2020.1742837","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT Can standardized assessment contribute to improving Adult Protective Services (APS) practice? In this exploratory study, San Francisco and Napa APS utilized a newly developed short self-neglect assessment to test how standardized measures provide information for substantiation decision making. Findings demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity for the short self-neglect assessment, and analyses revealed important issues that could improve practice. Review of outliers revealed: (1) problems using the assessment tool, (2) misunderstandings of APS procedures, and (3) struggles navigating the case management system. These revelations could all be easily addressed in training. Caseworker’s clinical judgment and experience also continue to have a place in complementing the use of the standardized assessment.
标准化措施能否对成人保护服务的真实性提供有益的反馈?试点数据来自一个简短的自我忽视评估。
标准化评估是否有助于改善成人保护服务(APS)的做法?在这项探索性研究中,旧金山和纳帕APS利用新开发的简短自我忽视评估来测试标准化措施如何为实证决策提供信息。研究结果表明,短期自我忽视评估的信度和效度令人满意,分析揭示了可以改进实践的重要问题。对异常值的回顾揭示了:(1)使用评估工具的问题,(2)对APS程序的误解,以及(3)在案例管理系统中导航的困难。这些启示都可以在培训中轻易解决。个案工作者的临床判断和经验也继续在补充标准化评估的使用中占有一席之地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
15.80%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect is the peer-reviewed quarterly journal that explores the advances in research, policy and practice, and clinical and ethical issues surrounding the abuse and neglect of older people. This unique forum provides state-of-the-art research and practice that is both international and multidisciplinary in scope. The journal"s broad, comprehensive approach is only one of its strengths—it presents training issues, research findings, case studies, practice and policy issues, book and media reviews, commentary, and historical background on a wide range of topics. Readers get tools and techniques needed for better detecting and responding to actual or potential elder abuse and neglect.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信