Magnitude of Abdominal Wound Dehiscence and Associated Factors of Patients Who Underwent Abdominal Operation at St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Surgery Research and Practice Pub Date : 2020-02-23 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/1379738
Berhanetsehay Teklewold, Dut Pioth, Tadele Dana
{"title":"Magnitude of Abdominal Wound Dehiscence and Associated Factors of Patients Who Underwent Abdominal Operation at St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.","authors":"Berhanetsehay Teklewold,&nbsp;Dut Pioth,&nbsp;Tadele Dana","doi":"10.1155/2020/1379738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Abdominal wound dehiscence (AWD) is the separation of different layers of an abdominal wound before complete healing has taken place. It is a major cause of postoperative morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa including Ethiopia, and little is known about its prevalence and related factors in the study area.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study is to assess the magnitude of abdominal wound dehiscence and related factors on patients operated at St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A hospital-based retrospective review of the chart was carried out by using the data covering three years (September 2014-September 2017) period. Data were collected from hospital medical records of sampled patients such as operation room logbooks and individual patient medical records. The collected data were checked for consistency, coded, and entered into SPSS version 20 for data processing and analysis. Descriptive analysis was conducted, and tables and graphs and summary statistics were used to depict data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 41 patients developed abdominal wound dehiscence from among 4137 patients who underwent abdominal laparotomy in the hospital. Among the patients, 51.2% were in the age range of 41 and above with mean age 29.8 (SD = 1.21) and 70.7% of them were male. Abdominal wound dehiscence was more common in emergency patients (90%) and vertical incision was the most common type of incision. Over half (58.5%) of the wound dehiscence occurred within 6-10 postoperative days. The majority (95.2%) of dehisced patients underwent relaparotomy for the management of the wound dehiscence, and 48.8% of them were treated with tension suture during the second operation of abdominal closure. Four of the patients (9.7%) died after the management of the second operation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current study revealed that the overall magnitude of abdominal wound dehiscence in the study area was 0.99%. Most of the dehiscence has occurred in male patients, and older age groups were highly affected than the younger ones. Emergency admission is the most common form of admission identified in the study, and this signifies appropriate preoperative preparation of patients for an optimal outcome. However, regarding the management outcome, 9.8% of patients died in our study within the institution after the second operation which is the high mortality rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":30584,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Research and Practice","volume":"2020 ","pages":"1379738"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/1379738","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1379738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Abdominal wound dehiscence (AWD) is the separation of different layers of an abdominal wound before complete healing has taken place. It is a major cause of postoperative morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa including Ethiopia, and little is known about its prevalence and related factors in the study area.

Objectives: The aim of this study is to assess the magnitude of abdominal wound dehiscence and related factors on patients operated at St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Methods: A hospital-based retrospective review of the chart was carried out by using the data covering three years (September 2014-September 2017) period. Data were collected from hospital medical records of sampled patients such as operation room logbooks and individual patient medical records. The collected data were checked for consistency, coded, and entered into SPSS version 20 for data processing and analysis. Descriptive analysis was conducted, and tables and graphs and summary statistics were used to depict data.

Results: A total of 41 patients developed abdominal wound dehiscence from among 4137 patients who underwent abdominal laparotomy in the hospital. Among the patients, 51.2% were in the age range of 41 and above with mean age 29.8 (SD = 1.21) and 70.7% of them were male. Abdominal wound dehiscence was more common in emergency patients (90%) and vertical incision was the most common type of incision. Over half (58.5%) of the wound dehiscence occurred within 6-10 postoperative days. The majority (95.2%) of dehisced patients underwent relaparotomy for the management of the wound dehiscence, and 48.8% of them were treated with tension suture during the second operation of abdominal closure. Four of the patients (9.7%) died after the management of the second operation.

Conclusion: The current study revealed that the overall magnitude of abdominal wound dehiscence in the study area was 0.99%. Most of the dehiscence has occurred in male patients, and older age groups were highly affected than the younger ones. Emergency admission is the most common form of admission identified in the study, and this signifies appropriate preoperative preparation of patients for an optimal outcome. However, regarding the management outcome, 9.8% of patients died in our study within the institution after the second operation which is the high mortality rate.

埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴圣保罗医院千禧医学院腹部手术患者腹部伤口裂开程度及相关因素
背景:腹部伤口裂开(AWD)是指腹部伤口在完全愈合之前发生的不同层的分离。它是包括埃塞俄比亚在内的撒哈拉以南非洲地区术后发病率和死亡率的主要原因,但对其在研究地区的患病率和相关因素知之甚少。目的:本研究的目的是评估在埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴圣保罗医院千禧医学院手术的患者腹部伤口裂开的程度及其相关因素。方法:采用2014年9月至2017年9月3年的数据,以医院为基础对图表进行回顾性分析。数据收集自样本患者的医院病历,如手术室日志和患者个人病历。对收集的数据进行一致性检查、编码,并输入SPSS 20版本进行数据处理和分析。进行描述性分析,采用图表和汇总统计对数据进行描述。结果:本院4137例剖腹手术患者中,41例发生腹部创面裂开。51.2%的患者年龄在41岁及以上,平均年龄29.8岁(SD = 1.21), 70.7%的患者为男性。急诊患者腹部伤口裂开多见(90%),垂直切口是最常见的切口类型。超过一半(58.5%)的伤口开裂发生在术后6-10天。绝大多数(95.2%)的裂开患者采用再开腹术处理伤口裂开,其中48.8%的患者在第二次闭腹手术时采用张力缝合。第二次手术后死亡4例(9.7%)。结论:本研究显示研究区腹部伤口裂开的总体程度为0.99%。裂口多发生在男性患者中,年龄较大的患者比年轻的患者发病率高。急诊入院是研究中发现的最常见的入院形式,这意味着患者为获得最佳结果进行了适当的术前准备。然而,在管理结果方面,我们研究中有9.8%的患者在第二次手术后死亡,死亡率很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Surgery Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for surgeons and the surgical research community. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on clinical and laboratory research relevant to surgical practice and teaching, with an emphasis on findings directly affecting surgical management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信