Cell-Free Circulating Tumour DNA Blood Testing to Detect EGFR T790M Mutation in People With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment.

Q1 Medicine
Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series Pub Date : 2020-03-06 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01
{"title":"Cell-Free Circulating Tumour DNA Blood Testing to Detect <i>EGFR</i> T790M Mutation in People With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cell-free circulating tumour DNA blood testing (also called liquid biopsy) can determine if a person with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose disease is progressing has developed the epidermal growth factor receptor (<i>EGFR</i>) T790M resistance mutation. Identifying this resistance mutation can help physicians choose appropriate treatment (i.e., osimertinib if positive and chemotherapy if negative). Tissue biopsy is typically used to look for the resistance mutation, but this is an invasive test that might not be feasible if the patient is too ill. We conducted a health technology assessment of liquid biopsy for people with advanced NSCLC, which included an evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy, clinical utility, safety, cost-effectiveness, and the budget impact of publicly funding liquid biopsy, as well as an evaluation of patient preferences and values.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic literature search of the clinical evidence. We assessed the risk of bias of each included study using Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews (ROBIS), Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2), Risk of Bias Among Non-randomized Studies (RoBANS), and the Cochrane risk of bias (ROB) tool and assessed quality of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group criteria. We performed a systematic economic literature search and conducted short-term and long-term cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses comparing liquid biopsy as a triage test, liquid biopsy alone, and tissue biopsy alone from a public payer perspective. We also analyzed the budget impact of publicly funding liquid biopsy for people in Ontario with advanced NSCLC. To assess the potential value of liquid biopsy, we spoke with people with lung cancer and people with an understanding of the process of liquid biopsy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 19 studies (within a published systematic review) to examine diagnostic test accuracy and 12 studies to examine clinical utility. In patients with advanced NSCLC, liquid biopsy to detect the <i>EGFR</i> T790M resistance mutation demonstrated a positive and negative predictive value of 89% and 61%, respectively, a sensitivity of 68%, and specificity of 86%. No studies examined the clinical utility of liquid biopsy as a triage test. When NSCLC was treated appropriately, progression-free survival was similar in patients with and without the resistance mutation, as ascertained by liquid biopsy.We estimated that it costs about $700 to conduct a liquid biopsy and $2,500 to conduct a tissue biopsy. Our analyses showed that, when considering costs and effects directly related to testing, liquid biopsy (as a triage test, which means patients who test negative undergo a follow-up tissue biopsy, or alone, which means using only liquid biopsy) was less costly than tissue biopsy alone and led to fewer tissue biopsies. Using liquid biopsy as a triage test produced the most correct treatment decisions and greatest number of people who were given osimertinib.When considering long-term costs (i.e., treatment and care) and effects (i.e., life-years and quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]), liquid biopsy as a triage test was the most effective and most costly strategy followed by liquid biopsy alone. Tissue biopsy alone was the least effective and least costly strategy. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of liquid biopsy as a triage test compared with liquid biopsy alone and of liquid biopsy alone compared with tissue biopsy alone were greater than $100,000 per QALY. However, this result was largely driven by the cost of osimertinib, which was used more often when liquid biopsy was used as a triage test.We estimated that the total annual budget impact of publicly funding liquid biopsy as a triage test in Ontario over the next 5 years would range from approximateily $60,000 in year 1 to $3 million in year 5.People with lung cancer with whom we spoke said that liquid biopsy would likely be an appropriate test for people with NSCLC given their frail condition and because it would avoid the pain and anxiety associated with tissue biopsy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As a minimally invasive test, liquid biopsy identifies a high proportion of people with the <i>EGFR</i> T790M resistance mutation. This identification could better guide treatment for people with advanced NSCLC. However, its relatively low negative predictive value means it is best used as a triage test (i.e., followed by tissue biopsy if the liquid biopsy does not identify a resistance mutation). Liquid biopsy as a triage test is likely more effective than tissue biopsy alone. However, owing to the high cost of treatment, liquid biopsy may not be cost-effective. We estimated that publicly funding liquid biopsy as a triage test in Ontario would result in additional costs (related to more patients being treated) of between $0.06 million and $3 million over the next 5 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":39160,"journal":{"name":"Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series","volume":"20 5","pages":"1-176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7082730/pdf/ohtas-20-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cell-free circulating tumour DNA blood testing (also called liquid biopsy) can determine if a person with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose disease is progressing has developed the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M resistance mutation. Identifying this resistance mutation can help physicians choose appropriate treatment (i.e., osimertinib if positive and chemotherapy if negative). Tissue biopsy is typically used to look for the resistance mutation, but this is an invasive test that might not be feasible if the patient is too ill. We conducted a health technology assessment of liquid biopsy for people with advanced NSCLC, which included an evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy, clinical utility, safety, cost-effectiveness, and the budget impact of publicly funding liquid biopsy, as well as an evaluation of patient preferences and values.

Methods: We performed a systematic literature search of the clinical evidence. We assessed the risk of bias of each included study using Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews (ROBIS), Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2), Risk of Bias Among Non-randomized Studies (RoBANS), and the Cochrane risk of bias (ROB) tool and assessed quality of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group criteria. We performed a systematic economic literature search and conducted short-term and long-term cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses comparing liquid biopsy as a triage test, liquid biopsy alone, and tissue biopsy alone from a public payer perspective. We also analyzed the budget impact of publicly funding liquid biopsy for people in Ontario with advanced NSCLC. To assess the potential value of liquid biopsy, we spoke with people with lung cancer and people with an understanding of the process of liquid biopsy.

Results: We included 19 studies (within a published systematic review) to examine diagnostic test accuracy and 12 studies to examine clinical utility. In patients with advanced NSCLC, liquid biopsy to detect the EGFR T790M resistance mutation demonstrated a positive and negative predictive value of 89% and 61%, respectively, a sensitivity of 68%, and specificity of 86%. No studies examined the clinical utility of liquid biopsy as a triage test. When NSCLC was treated appropriately, progression-free survival was similar in patients with and without the resistance mutation, as ascertained by liquid biopsy.We estimated that it costs about $700 to conduct a liquid biopsy and $2,500 to conduct a tissue biopsy. Our analyses showed that, when considering costs and effects directly related to testing, liquid biopsy (as a triage test, which means patients who test negative undergo a follow-up tissue biopsy, or alone, which means using only liquid biopsy) was less costly than tissue biopsy alone and led to fewer tissue biopsies. Using liquid biopsy as a triage test produced the most correct treatment decisions and greatest number of people who were given osimertinib.When considering long-term costs (i.e., treatment and care) and effects (i.e., life-years and quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]), liquid biopsy as a triage test was the most effective and most costly strategy followed by liquid biopsy alone. Tissue biopsy alone was the least effective and least costly strategy. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of liquid biopsy as a triage test compared with liquid biopsy alone and of liquid biopsy alone compared with tissue biopsy alone were greater than $100,000 per QALY. However, this result was largely driven by the cost of osimertinib, which was used more often when liquid biopsy was used as a triage test.We estimated that the total annual budget impact of publicly funding liquid biopsy as a triage test in Ontario over the next 5 years would range from approximateily $60,000 in year 1 to $3 million in year 5.People with lung cancer with whom we spoke said that liquid biopsy would likely be an appropriate test for people with NSCLC given their frail condition and because it would avoid the pain and anxiety associated with tissue biopsy.

Conclusions: As a minimally invasive test, liquid biopsy identifies a high proportion of people with the EGFR T790M resistance mutation. This identification could better guide treatment for people with advanced NSCLC. However, its relatively low negative predictive value means it is best used as a triage test (i.e., followed by tissue biopsy if the liquid biopsy does not identify a resistance mutation). Liquid biopsy as a triage test is likely more effective than tissue biopsy alone. However, owing to the high cost of treatment, liquid biopsy may not be cost-effective. We estimated that publicly funding liquid biopsy as a triage test in Ontario would result in additional costs (related to more patients being treated) of between $0.06 million and $3 million over the next 5 years.

检测晚期非小细胞肺癌患者表皮生长因子受体 T790M 基因突变的无细胞循环肿瘤 DNA 血液检测:健康技术评估》。
背景:无细胞循环肿瘤DNA血液检测(又称液体活检)可确定病情正在进展的晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者是否已出现表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)T790M耐药突变。识别这种耐药突变可以帮助医生选择适当的治疗方法(即如果阳性,则选择奥希替尼,如果阴性,则选择化疗)。组织活检通常用于寻找耐药突变,但这是一项侵入性检查,如果患者病情严重,可能无法进行。我们对晚期 NSCLC 患者的液体活检进行了一项健康技术评估,其中包括对诊断准确性、临床实用性、安全性、成本效益和液体活检公共资助的预算影响的评估,以及对患者偏好和价值的评估:我们对临床证据进行了系统的文献检索。我们使用系统综述偏倚风险(ROBIS)、诊断准确性研究质量评估(QUADAS-2)、非随机研究偏倚风险(RoBANS)和 Cochrane 偏倚风险(ROB)工具评估了每项纳入研究的偏倚风险,并根据建议评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)工作组标准评估了证据质量。我们进行了系统的经济学文献检索,并从公共付费者的角度对作为分诊检查的液体活检、单纯液体活检和单纯组织活检进行了短期和长期成本效益和成本效用分析。我们还分析了公共资助液体活检对安大略省晚期 NSCLC 患者预算的影响。为了评估液体活检的潜在价值,我们采访了肺癌患者和了解液体活检过程的人士:我们纳入了 19 项研究(在已发表的系统综述范围内)以检查诊断测试的准确性,并纳入了 12 项研究以检查临床效用。在晚期NSCLC患者中,通过液体活检检测表皮生长因子受体T790M耐药突变的阳性预测值为89%,阴性预测值为61%,敏感性为68%,特异性为86%。没有研究对液体活检作为分诊检验的临床实用性进行研究。我们估计,进行一次液体活检的成本约为700美元,而进行一次组织活检的成本约为2500美元。我们的分析表明,在考虑与检测直接相关的成本和效果时,液体活检(作为分流检测,即检测阴性的患者接受后续组织活检,或单独使用,即仅使用液体活检)比单独组织活检的成本更低,组织活检的次数也更少。在考虑长期成本(即治疗和护理)和效果(即生命年和质量调整生命年[QALYs])时,液体活检作为分流检验是最有效、成本最高的策略,其次是单纯液体活检。单纯组织活检是最无效且成本最低的策略。液体活检作为分流检测与单纯液体活检相比,以及单纯液体活检与单纯组织活检相比,每QALY的增量成本效益比(ICER)均大于100,000美元。然而,这一结果主要是由奥希替尼的成本所导致的,因为在使用液体活检作为分流检测时,奥希替尼的使用频率更高。我们估计,在未来 5 年内,安大略省政府资助液体活检作为分流检测的年度预算影响总额将从第 1 年的约 6 万美元到第 5 年的 300 万美元不等。与我们交谈过的肺癌患者表示,鉴于NSCLC患者体质虚弱,液体活检很可能是一种合适的检测方法,因为它可以避免组织活检带来的痛苦和焦虑:作为一种微创检验,液体活检能识别出很高比例的表皮生长因子受体 T790M 耐药突变患者。这种鉴别能更好地指导晚期 NSCLC 患者的治疗。然而,液体活检的阴性预测值相对较低,因此最好将其作为一种分流检测(即如果液体活检未发现耐药突变,则进行组织活检)。液体活检作为分流检测可能比单独进行组织活检更有效。然而,由于治疗费用高昂,液体活检可能不具成本效益。我们估计,在安大略省公开资助液体活检作为一种分流检测方法,将在未来 5 年内带来 6 万至 300 万美元的额外成本(与更多患者接受治疗有关)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series
Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信