Effect of Biospray Dressings on Eosinophil Infiltration in the Nasal Mucosa and Serum IgE Levels After Nasal Provocation in Experimental Allergic Rhinitis.

IF 2.3 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Allergy & Rhinology Pub Date : 2020-03-05 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2152656720902142
Shan Huang, Geping Wu, Xiaodan Gu, Hongyan Zhu, Xingkai Ma, Yifang Yuan, Yan Lv, Di Li, Ling Zhang
{"title":"Effect of Biospray Dressings on Eosinophil Infiltration in the Nasal Mucosa and Serum IgE Levels After Nasal Provocation in Experimental Allergic Rhinitis.","authors":"Shan Huang, Geping Wu, Xiaodan Gu, Hongyan Zhu, Xingkai Ma, Yifang Yuan, Yan Lv, Di Li, Ling Zhang","doi":"10.1177/2152656720902142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose To investigate the effect of biospray dressing on the extent of eosinophil infiltration in the nasal mucosa and the level of serum IgE in experimental allergic rhinitis with nasal provocation. Method Twenty-four BALB/c mice were randomly divided into the normal control group, allergic rhinitis (AR) group, dexamethasone (DEX) treatment group, and biospray dressing (BD) group. The mice in the latter 3 groups were prepared for animal models of AR according to standard protocols. Mice in the BD group were administered a nasal spray before the nasal provocation, and those in the DEX group were administered an intraperitoneal injection of DEX. The nasal mucosa and serum were collected from each group. Nasal mucosa eosinophil infiltration was evaluated using hematoxylin and eosin staining, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed to analyze the serum IgE expression. Results Eosinophil infiltration (AR vs BD P = .009) in the nasal mucosa and serum IgE expression (AR vs BD P = .001) were significantly lower in the BD group than in the AR group. There were no significant differences in the extent of eosinophil infiltration in the nasal mucosa or serum IgE expression between the BD and DEX groups. Conclusion Biospray dressings can significantly reduce allergen provocation in the nasal cavity and have a protective effect on the nasal mucosa. They can be used for the prevention and treatment of AR.","PeriodicalId":45192,"journal":{"name":"Allergy & Rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2152656720902142","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy & Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2152656720902142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose To investigate the effect of biospray dressing on the extent of eosinophil infiltration in the nasal mucosa and the level of serum IgE in experimental allergic rhinitis with nasal provocation. Method Twenty-four BALB/c mice were randomly divided into the normal control group, allergic rhinitis (AR) group, dexamethasone (DEX) treatment group, and biospray dressing (BD) group. The mice in the latter 3 groups were prepared for animal models of AR according to standard protocols. Mice in the BD group were administered a nasal spray before the nasal provocation, and those in the DEX group were administered an intraperitoneal injection of DEX. The nasal mucosa and serum were collected from each group. Nasal mucosa eosinophil infiltration was evaluated using hematoxylin and eosin staining, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed to analyze the serum IgE expression. Results Eosinophil infiltration (AR vs BD P = .009) in the nasal mucosa and serum IgE expression (AR vs BD P = .001) were significantly lower in the BD group than in the AR group. There were no significant differences in the extent of eosinophil infiltration in the nasal mucosa or serum IgE expression between the BD and DEX groups. Conclusion Biospray dressings can significantly reduce allergen provocation in the nasal cavity and have a protective effect on the nasal mucosa. They can be used for the prevention and treatment of AR.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

生物喷雾敷料对实验性变应性鼻炎鼻腔刺激后鼻黏膜嗜酸性粒细胞浸润及血清IgE水平的影响。
目的:探讨生物喷雾敷料对实验性变应性鼻炎鼻黏膜嗜酸性粒细胞浸润程度及血清IgE水平的影响。方法:将24只BALB/c小鼠随机分为正常对照组、变应性鼻炎(AR)组、地塞米松(DEX)治疗组和生物喷雾敷料(BD)组。后3组小鼠按标准方案制备AR动物模型。BD组小鼠在鼻腔刺激前鼻腔喷雾剂,DEX组小鼠在鼻腔刺激前腹腔注射DEX。采集各组大鼠鼻黏膜及血清。采用苏木精染色、伊红染色检测鼻黏膜嗜酸性粒细胞浸润情况,ELISA检测血清IgE表达。结果:BD组鼻黏膜嗜酸性粒细胞浸润(AR vs BD P = 0.009)、血清IgE表达(AR vs BD P = 0.001)明显低于AR组。BD组与DEX组大鼠鼻黏膜嗜酸性粒细胞浸润程度及血清IgE表达差异无统计学意义。结论:生物喷雾敷料能明显减少鼻腔内过敏原的激发,对鼻黏膜有保护作用。它们可用于预防和治疗AR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Allergy & Rhinology
Allergy & Rhinology OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
11
审稿时长
15 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信