Caesarean section in Benin and Mali: increased recourse to technology due to suffering and under-resourced facilities

Q1 Social Sciences
Clémence Schantz , Moufalilou Aboubakar , Abou Bakary Traoré , Marion Ravit , Myriam de Loenzien , Alexandre Dumont
{"title":"Caesarean section in Benin and Mali: increased recourse to technology due to suffering and under-resourced facilities","authors":"Clémence Schantz ,&nbsp;Moufalilou Aboubakar ,&nbsp;Abou Bakary Traoré ,&nbsp;Marion Ravit ,&nbsp;Myriam de Loenzien ,&nbsp;Alexandre Dumont","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2019.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In line with policies to combat maternal mortality, the medicalization of childbirth is increasing in low-income countries, while access to healthcare services remains difficult for many women. High caesarean section rates have been documented recently in hospitals in Mali and Benin, illustrating an a-priori paradoxical situation, compared with low caesarean section rates in the population. Through a qualitative approach, this article aims to describe the practice of caesarean section in maternity wards in Bamako and Cotonou. Workshops with obstetricians and midwives; participant observation inside labour rooms; and in-depth interviews with caregivers, patients and policy makers have indicated increased recourse to caesarean section due to women’s and caregivers’ suffering and under-resourced facilities. Within these procedures, two types of caesarean section were documented: ‘maternal distress caesarean section’ and ‘preventive caesarean section’. The main reasons for these caesarean sections are maternal fear and pain, and a lack of resources. Inadequately resourced facilities lead to staff suffering and ethical breakdowns, and encourage the inappropriate use of technology. The policy of access to free caesarean section procedures exacerbates the issue of non-medically-justified caesarean sections in these countries. The overuse of caesarean section is particularly alarming in countries with high fertility as it constitutes a danger to both mothers and babies in the short and long term. Currently, conditions are in place in Benin and Mali for an increase in non-medically-justified caesarean sections. In the short term, such an increase could constitute a new burden for these two sub-Saharan countries, where maternal mortality is high.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbms.2019.12.001","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405661820300010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

In line with policies to combat maternal mortality, the medicalization of childbirth is increasing in low-income countries, while access to healthcare services remains difficult for many women. High caesarean section rates have been documented recently in hospitals in Mali and Benin, illustrating an a-priori paradoxical situation, compared with low caesarean section rates in the population. Through a qualitative approach, this article aims to describe the practice of caesarean section in maternity wards in Bamako and Cotonou. Workshops with obstetricians and midwives; participant observation inside labour rooms; and in-depth interviews with caregivers, patients and policy makers have indicated increased recourse to caesarean section due to women’s and caregivers’ suffering and under-resourced facilities. Within these procedures, two types of caesarean section were documented: ‘maternal distress caesarean section’ and ‘preventive caesarean section’. The main reasons for these caesarean sections are maternal fear and pain, and a lack of resources. Inadequately resourced facilities lead to staff suffering and ethical breakdowns, and encourage the inappropriate use of technology. The policy of access to free caesarean section procedures exacerbates the issue of non-medically-justified caesarean sections in these countries. The overuse of caesarean section is particularly alarming in countries with high fertility as it constitutes a danger to both mothers and babies in the short and long term. Currently, conditions are in place in Benin and Mali for an increase in non-medically-justified caesarean sections. In the short term, such an increase could constitute a new burden for these two sub-Saharan countries, where maternal mortality is high.

Abstract Image

贝宁和马里的剖腹产:由于痛苦和设施资源不足,更多地求助于技术
根据降低孕产妇死亡率的政策,低收入国家的分娩医疗化正在增加,但许多妇女仍然难以获得保健服务。最近在马里和贝宁的医院记录到高剖腹产率,与人口中的低剖腹产率相比,这说明了一种先验的矛盾情况。通过定性的方法,本文旨在描述在巴马科和科托努产科病房剖腹产的做法。产科医生和助产士讲习班;劳工室内的参与性观察;对护理人员、患者和政策制定者的深入访谈表明,由于妇女和护理人员的痛苦以及资源不足的设施,越来越多的人选择剖腹产。在这些手术中,记录了两种类型的剖腹产:“产妇窘迫剖腹产”和“预防性剖腹产”。这些剖腹产的主要原因是产妇的恐惧和痛苦,以及缺乏资源。资源不足的设施导致工作人员痛苦和道德崩溃,并鼓励不适当地使用技术。获得免费剖腹产手术的政策加剧了这些国家非医学上合理的剖腹产问题。在生育率高的国家,过度使用剖腹产尤其令人震惊,因为它在短期和长期内对母亲和婴儿都构成危险。目前,贝宁和马里有条件增加非医学上合理的剖腹产。在短期内,这种增加可能对产妇死亡率高的这两个撒哈拉以南国家构成新的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online
Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: RBMS is a new journal dedicated to interdisciplinary discussion and debate of the rapidly expanding field of reproductive biomedicine, particularly all of its many societal and cultural implications. It is intended to bring to attention new research in the social sciences, arts and humanities on human reproduction, new reproductive technologies, and related areas such as human embryonic stem cell derivation. Its audience comprises researchers, clinicians, practitioners, policy makers, academics and patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信