Allergen immunotherapy phase II trials: Challenges in dose finding.

Allergologie Select Pub Date : 2019-12-30 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.5414/ALX02033E
J Kleine-Tebbe, S Kaul, R Mösges
{"title":"Allergen immunotherapy phase II trials: Challenges in dose finding.","authors":"J Kleine-Tebbe,&nbsp;S Kaul,&nbsp;R Mösges","doi":"10.5414/ALX02033E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Phase II studies on allergen immunotherapy (AIT) should define the dose with the best balance between efficacy and safety (\"optimal dose\"). Their key role is based on dose selection for subsequent pivotal studies (phase III, field studies). Since products for AIT differ in composition and unit definitions, phase II trials are mandatory for new products and preparations being developed according to the German Therapy Allergen Ordinance (\"Therapie-Allergeneverordnung\", TAV) due to current EMA guidelines since 2009. The latter permit various in-vivo models and endpoints for phase II studies, e.g., AIT-induced changes in skin test, nasal, conjunctival or bronchial provocation, or in exposure chamber or field trials. Selection and graduation of the doses, minimization of placebo effects, and sufficient numbers of patients are a challenge. Effort, required time, and costs are important variables for the initiators of phase II trials. Risks are characterized by e.g., a) too small doses without relevant differences compared to placebo, b) missing true dose-response relationships, c) strong placebo effect and consequently small \"therapeutic window\", d) large heterogeneity and missing distinct differences (compared to placebo), e) too small effects in field studies due to low allergen exposure, f) missing dose-related increase (in case of too high doses). In the view of the Paul-Ehrlich-Institute, the unambiguous phase II trials with TAV products performed until today were not able to confirm the marketed doses for AIT. Regardless of the utilized model, more raw and single data should illustrate the individual outcome of AIT during phase II trials, facilitating an improved and more intuitive interpretation of the data (placebo effects? scattering?). In the medium term, evidence regarding AIT efficacy will considerably increase due to phase II trials as a prerequisite for subsequent phase III field studies. This affects all manufacturers offering AIT products in Germany and Europe.</p>","PeriodicalId":7485,"journal":{"name":"Allergologie Select","volume":"3 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7066681/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergologie Select","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5414/ALX02033E","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Phase II studies on allergen immunotherapy (AIT) should define the dose with the best balance between efficacy and safety ("optimal dose"). Their key role is based on dose selection for subsequent pivotal studies (phase III, field studies). Since products for AIT differ in composition and unit definitions, phase II trials are mandatory for new products and preparations being developed according to the German Therapy Allergen Ordinance ("Therapie-Allergeneverordnung", TAV) due to current EMA guidelines since 2009. The latter permit various in-vivo models and endpoints for phase II studies, e.g., AIT-induced changes in skin test, nasal, conjunctival or bronchial provocation, or in exposure chamber or field trials. Selection and graduation of the doses, minimization of placebo effects, and sufficient numbers of patients are a challenge. Effort, required time, and costs are important variables for the initiators of phase II trials. Risks are characterized by e.g., a) too small doses without relevant differences compared to placebo, b) missing true dose-response relationships, c) strong placebo effect and consequently small "therapeutic window", d) large heterogeneity and missing distinct differences (compared to placebo), e) too small effects in field studies due to low allergen exposure, f) missing dose-related increase (in case of too high doses). In the view of the Paul-Ehrlich-Institute, the unambiguous phase II trials with TAV products performed until today were not able to confirm the marketed doses for AIT. Regardless of the utilized model, more raw and single data should illustrate the individual outcome of AIT during phase II trials, facilitating an improved and more intuitive interpretation of the data (placebo effects? scattering?). In the medium term, evidence regarding AIT efficacy will considerably increase due to phase II trials as a prerequisite for subsequent phase III field studies. This affects all manufacturers offering AIT products in Germany and Europe.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

过敏原免疫治疗II期试验:剂量发现的挑战。
过敏原免疫治疗(AIT)的II期研究应确定在疗效和安全性之间达到最佳平衡的剂量(“最佳剂量”)。它们的关键作用是基于后续关键研究(III期、实地研究)的剂量选择。由于AIT产品的成分和单位定义不同,根据2009年以来的现行EMA指南,根据德国治疗过敏原条例(“therapieallergeneverordnung”,TAV)开发的新产品和制剂必须进行II期试验。后者允许用于II期研究的各种体内模型和终点,例如,在皮肤试验、鼻腔、结膜或支气管刺激、暴露室或现场试验中,ait引起的变化。剂量的选择和分级、安慰剂效应的最小化以及足够数量的患者都是一个挑战。努力、所需时间和成本是II期试验启动者的重要变量。风险的特征如下:a)与安慰剂相比,剂量太小,没有相关差异;b)缺少真正的剂量-反应关系;c)安慰剂效应强,因此“治疗窗口”小;d)异质性大,缺少明显差异(与安慰剂相比);e)由于低过敏原暴露,在实地研究中效果太小;f)缺少剂量相关的增加(在剂量过高的情况下)。paul - ehrlich研究所认为,直到今天,TAV产品进行的明确的II期试验还不能确认AIT的上市剂量。无论采用何种模型,更多的原始和单一数据都应该说明II期试验中AIT的个体结果,促进对数据的改进和更直观的解释(安慰剂效应?散射吗?)从中期来看,由于II期试验是后续III期实地研究的先决条件,有关AIT疗效的证据将大大增加。这影响了所有在德国和欧洲提供AIT产品的制造商。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信