Alignment of a Language Instrument Scores to CEFR Levels: Methodological and Empirical Considerations.

Journal of applied measurement Pub Date : 2020-01-01
Georgios D Sideridis, Abdulrahman Al-Samrani, Bjorn Norrbom
{"title":"Alignment of a Language Instrument Scores to CEFR Levels: Methodological and Empirical Considerations.","authors":"Georgios D Sideridis,&nbsp;Abdulrahman Al-Samrani,&nbsp;Bjorn Norrbom","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of the present report was to assess congruence between a language-based national examination (termed English placement test - EPT) and the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) levels. To this end, a series of methodological steps were put forth to accumulate evidence suggesting that language performance based on the EPT instrument can be split onto meaningful subgroups based on theoretical (expert judgement on difficulty level and CEFR correspondence) and empirical considerations (i.e., how well these levels and subgroups emerged). Participants were 2642 high school graduates who took on the EPT instrument as part of their entry criteria to the university and for the purposes of the present study only the structure subscale is presented. Items were classified as reflecting specific CEFR levels and a person-based analysis attempted to classify individuals sharing the same behavioral patterns. Results using a latent class analysis (LCA) indicated that a Pre-A1, an A1 an A2 a B1 and a B2 levels were present with regard to the structure domain of language. Results showed a strong alignment between the EPT structure domain and CEFR guidelines using various methodological approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":73608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied measurement","volume":"21 1","pages":"68-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the present report was to assess congruence between a language-based national examination (termed English placement test - EPT) and the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) levels. To this end, a series of methodological steps were put forth to accumulate evidence suggesting that language performance based on the EPT instrument can be split onto meaningful subgroups based on theoretical (expert judgement on difficulty level and CEFR correspondence) and empirical considerations (i.e., how well these levels and subgroups emerged). Participants were 2642 high school graduates who took on the EPT instrument as part of their entry criteria to the university and for the purposes of the present study only the structure subscale is presented. Items were classified as reflecting specific CEFR levels and a person-based analysis attempted to classify individuals sharing the same behavioral patterns. Results using a latent class analysis (LCA) indicated that a Pre-A1, an A1 an A2 a B1 and a B2 levels were present with regard to the structure domain of language. Results showed a strong alignment between the EPT structure domain and CEFR guidelines using various methodological approaches.

语言工具分数与CEFR水平的一致性:方法和经验考虑。
本报告的目的是评估以语文为基础的国家考试(称为英语分班考试- EPT)与欧洲语文共同参考框架水平之间的一致性。为此,研究人员提出了一系列方法步骤,以积累证据,表明基于EPT工具的语言表现可以根据理论(专家对难度水平和CEFR对应程度的判断)和经验考虑(即这些水平和子组的出现程度)划分为有意义的子组。参与者是2642名高中毕业生,他们将EPT作为大学入学标准的一部分,为了本研究的目的,只提出了结构子量表。项目被分类为反映特定的CEFR水平,基于人的分析试图对具有相同行为模式的个体进行分类。潜在类分析(LCA)结果表明,在语言结构领域存在Pre-A1、A1、A2、B1和B2水平。结果显示EPT结构域与CEFR指南之间有很强的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信