Comparative Analysis of Geographic Accessibility of Dentists, Physiotherapists and Family Physicians in an Urban Centre: A Case Study of Saskatoon, Canada.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Tayyab Shah, Brenna Bath, Alyssa Hayes, Marina Jones, Scott Bell, Gerry Uswak, Stephan Milosavljevic
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Geographic Accessibility of Dentists, Physiotherapists and Family Physicians in an Urban Centre: A Case Study of Saskatoon, Canada.","authors":"Tayyab Shah,&nbsp;Brenna Bath,&nbsp;Alyssa Hayes,&nbsp;Marina Jones,&nbsp;Scott Bell,&nbsp;Gerry Uswak,&nbsp;Stephan Milosavljevic","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The spatial arrangement of primary health care (PHC) services is influenced by many factors and varies across provider types. In Canada, unlike physician services, certain PHC services (i.e., dentistry, physiotherapy) are not fully funded under the health care system. As a result, one might expect the arrangement of these services to differ by neighbourhood, even in dense metropolitan areas.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examines the intra-urban variability of geographic access to dental (DS) and physiotherapy (PT) services in relation to family physician (FP) services in an urban area and identifies underserviced neighbourhoods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Practice location information was gathered from publicly available and routinely updated provincial sources (physician, physiotherapy and dentistry regulatory colleges). A neighbourhood accessibility score for all 3 PHC services was calculated using a GIS-based, 3-step floating catchment area method. A set of parameters, such as catchment type (road network buffer), size (3 km radius) and census centroids (dissemination areas), was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall access scores for FP, PT and DS services (based on the 281 FPs, 226 PTs, and 152 DSs) were 1.45 (SD 0.94), 1.18 (SD 0.81) and 0.79 (SD 0.53) providers/1000 population, respectively. Spatial comparison of the accessibility scores indicated a greater proportion of the Saskatoon population has lower access scores (< 0.5/1000 population) for both physiotherapy (n = 79 450) and dental (n = 101 270) services compared with family physician services (n = 64 420). Exploration of the relation between PHC service arrangement and key sociodemographic variables (e.g. low income, education levels) showed that a considerable proportion of those in each sociodemographic group has poor PT and DS access.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This research has identified accessibility gaps and serves to inform the development of health policies focused on equitable distribution and funding of PHC services based on population health needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50005,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Canadian Dental Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Canadian Dental Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The spatial arrangement of primary health care (PHC) services is influenced by many factors and varies across provider types. In Canada, unlike physician services, certain PHC services (i.e., dentistry, physiotherapy) are not fully funded under the health care system. As a result, one might expect the arrangement of these services to differ by neighbourhood, even in dense metropolitan areas.

Objective: This study examines the intra-urban variability of geographic access to dental (DS) and physiotherapy (PT) services in relation to family physician (FP) services in an urban area and identifies underserviced neighbourhoods.

Methods: Practice location information was gathered from publicly available and routinely updated provincial sources (physician, physiotherapy and dentistry regulatory colleges). A neighbourhood accessibility score for all 3 PHC services was calculated using a GIS-based, 3-step floating catchment area method. A set of parameters, such as catchment type (road network buffer), size (3 km radius) and census centroids (dissemination areas), was used.

Results: The overall access scores for FP, PT and DS services (based on the 281 FPs, 226 PTs, and 152 DSs) were 1.45 (SD 0.94), 1.18 (SD 0.81) and 0.79 (SD 0.53) providers/1000 population, respectively. Spatial comparison of the accessibility scores indicated a greater proportion of the Saskatoon population has lower access scores (< 0.5/1000 population) for both physiotherapy (n = 79 450) and dental (n = 101 270) services compared with family physician services (n = 64 420). Exploration of the relation between PHC service arrangement and key sociodemographic variables (e.g. low income, education levels) showed that a considerable proportion of those in each sociodemographic group has poor PT and DS access.

Conclusion: This research has identified accessibility gaps and serves to inform the development of health policies focused on equitable distribution and funding of PHC services based on population health needs.

城市中心牙医、物理治疗师和家庭医生地理可达性的比较分析:以加拿大萨斯卡通为例
背景:初级卫生保健(PHC)服务的空间安排受到许多因素的影响,并因提供者类型而异。在加拿大,与医生服务不同,某些初级保健服务(即牙科、物理治疗)并非由卫生保健系统全额资助。因此,人们可能会认为这些服务的安排会因社区而异,即使在人口密集的大都市地区也是如此。目的:本研究考察了城市地区牙科(DS)和物理治疗(PT)服务与家庭医生(FP)服务之间的城市内部地理可及性,并确定了服务不足的社区。方法:从公开和定期更新的省级来源(医师、理疗和牙科管理学院)收集执业地点信息。使用基于gis的三步浮动集水区法计算了所有3种初级保健服务的社区可达性得分。使用了集水区类型(路网缓冲区)、大小(3公里半径)和普查质心(传播区)等一系列参数。结果:FP、PT和DS服务(基于281个FPs、226个PTs和152个DS)的总体获取分数分别为1.45 (SD 0.94)、1.18 (SD 0.81)和0.79 (SD 0.53)个提供者/1000人。可及性得分的空间比较表明,与家庭医生服务(n = 64 420)相比,萨斯卡通人口中物理治疗(n = 79 450)和牙科(n = 101 270)服务的可及性得分较低(< 0.5/1000人口)的比例更大。对初级保健服务安排与主要社会人口变量(如低收入、教育水平)之间关系的探讨表明,每个社会人口群体中都有相当比例的人无法获得初级保健服务和保健服务。结论:本研究确定了可及性差距,并为制定卫生政策提供信息,重点是根据人口健康需求公平分配和资助初级保健服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Canadian Dental Association
Journal of the Canadian Dental Association 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: JCDA.ca (Journal of the Canadian Dental Association) is the flagship scholarly, peer-reviewed publication of CDA, providing dialogue between the national association and the dental community. It is dedicated to publishing worthy scientific and clinical articles and informing dentists of issues significant to the profession. CDA has focused its recent efforts on knowledge, advocacy and practice support initiatives and JCDA.ca is an essential part of CDA''s knowledge strategy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信