A treatment-based algorithm for identification of diabetes type in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

IF 1.3 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiovascular Endocrinology & Metabolism Pub Date : 2020-02-21 eCollection Date: 2020-03-01 DOI:10.1097/XCE.0000000000000189
Mitra Mosslemi, Hannah L Park, Christine E McLaren, Nathan D Wong
{"title":"A treatment-based algorithm for identification of diabetes type in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.","authors":"Mitra Mosslemi,&nbsp;Hannah L Park,&nbsp;Christine E McLaren,&nbsp;Nathan D Wong","doi":"10.1097/XCE.0000000000000189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In epidemiology studies, identification of diabetes type (type 1 vs. type 2) among study participants with diabetes is important; however, conventional diabetes type identification approaches that include age at diabetes diagnosis as an initial criterion introduces biases. Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, we have developed a novel algorithm which does not include age at diagnosis to identify participants with self-reported diagnosed diabetes as having type 1 vs. type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 5457 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey participants between cycles 1999-2000 and 2015-2016 reported that a health professional had diagnosed them as having diabetes at a time other than during pregnancy and had complete information on diabetes-related questions. After developing an algorithm based on information regarding the treatment(s) they received, we classified these participants as having type 1 or type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The treatment-based algorithm yielded a 6-94% split for type 1 and type 2 diabetes, which is consistent with reports from the Centers for Disease Control and other resources. Moreover, the demographics and clinical characteristics of the assigned type 1 and type 2 cases were consistent with contemporary epidemiologic findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Applying diabetes treatment information from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, as formulated in our treatment-based algorithm, may better identify type 1 and type 2 diabetes cases and thus prevent the specific biases imposed by conventional approaches which include the age of diabetes diagnosis as an initial criterion for diabetes type classification.</p>","PeriodicalId":43231,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":"9 1","pages":"9-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/XCE.0000000000000189","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCE.0000000000000189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

In epidemiology studies, identification of diabetes type (type 1 vs. type 2) among study participants with diabetes is important; however, conventional diabetes type identification approaches that include age at diabetes diagnosis as an initial criterion introduces biases. Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, we have developed a novel algorithm which does not include age at diagnosis to identify participants with self-reported diagnosed diabetes as having type 1 vs. type 2 diabetes.

Methods: A total of 5457 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey participants between cycles 1999-2000 and 2015-2016 reported that a health professional had diagnosed them as having diabetes at a time other than during pregnancy and had complete information on diabetes-related questions. After developing an algorithm based on information regarding the treatment(s) they received, we classified these participants as having type 1 or type 2 diabetes.

Results: The treatment-based algorithm yielded a 6-94% split for type 1 and type 2 diabetes, which is consistent with reports from the Centers for Disease Control and other resources. Moreover, the demographics and clinical characteristics of the assigned type 1 and type 2 cases were consistent with contemporary epidemiologic findings.

Conclusion: Applying diabetes treatment information from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, as formulated in our treatment-based algorithm, may better identify type 1 and type 2 diabetes cases and thus prevent the specific biases imposed by conventional approaches which include the age of diabetes diagnosis as an initial criterion for diabetes type classification.

一种基于治疗方法的国民健康与营养检查调查中糖尿病类型识别算法。
在流行病学研究中,确定糖尿病患者的糖尿病类型(1型vs. 2型)是很重要的;然而,传统的糖尿病类型识别方法将糖尿病诊断时的年龄作为初始标准引入了偏差。利用国家健康和营养检查调查的数据,我们开发了一种新的算法,该算法不包括诊断时的年龄,以识别自我报告诊断为1型糖尿病和2型糖尿病的参与者。方法:在1999-2000年和2015-2016年期间,共有5457名全国健康与营养调查参与者报告说,他们在怀孕期间以外的时间被卫生专业人员诊断为糖尿病,并对糖尿病相关问题有完整的信息。在根据他们接受的治疗信息开发了一种算法后,我们将这些参与者分为1型和2型糖尿病。结果:基于治疗的算法对1型和2型糖尿病产生了6-94%的分裂,这与疾病控制中心和其他资源的报告一致。此外,指定的1型和2型病例的人口统计学和临床特征与当代流行病学调查结果一致。结论:根据我们的基于治疗的算法,应用来自全国健康与营养检查调查的糖尿病治疗信息,可以更好地识别1型和2型糖尿病病例,从而防止传统方法将糖尿病诊断年龄作为糖尿病类型分类的初始标准所带来的特定偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Endocrinology & Metabolism
Cardiovascular Endocrinology & Metabolism CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信