Effects of aerobic and anaerobic exercise on glucose tolerance in patients with coronary heart disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

IF 1.3 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiovascular Endocrinology & Metabolism Pub Date : 2020-02-21 eCollection Date: 2020-03-01 DOI:10.1097/XCE.0000000000000188
Bernhard Schwaab, Friderike Kafsack, Edith Markmann, Morten Schütt
{"title":"Effects of aerobic and anaerobic exercise on glucose tolerance in patients with coronary heart disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus.","authors":"Bernhard Schwaab,&nbsp;Friderike Kafsack,&nbsp;Edith Markmann,&nbsp;Morten Schütt","doi":"10.1097/XCE.0000000000000188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), physical activity is strongly advised as nonpharmacological therapy. In general, a moderate aerobic exercise intensity is recommended. It was also proposed, however, that greater intensities tend to yield even greater benefits in HbA1c. Hence, the most appropriate exercise intensity seems not to be established yet. We compared the effect of moderate (aerobic) and vigorous (anaerobic) activity on postprandial plasma glucose.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 10 consecutive patients (63 ± 12 years, BMI 28.3 ± 2.6 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, fasting plasma glucose 6.1 ± 1.2 mmol/l), 2-hour plasma glucose was ≥11.1 mmol/l in the oral glucose tolerance test at rest (OGTT-0). Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPX) was performed until a respiratory exchange ratio (RER) ≥1.20, beeing anaerobic (CPX-1), followed by OGTT-1. A steady-state CPX of 30-minute duration was performed targeting an RER between 0.90 and 0.95, being aerobic (CPX-2), followed by OGTT-2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In CPX-1, maximum exercise intensity (maxIntensity) averaged at 99 ± 30 Watt and peak oxygen consumption (VO<sub>2peak</sub>) reached 15.9 ± 2.8 ml/min/kg. In CPX-2, aerobic intensity averaged at 29 ± 9 Watt, representing 31% of maxIntensity and 61% of VO<sub>2peak</sub>. After aerobic exercise, 2-hour plasma glucose was significantly reduced to an average of 9.4 ± 2.3 mmol/l (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Anaerobic exercise did not reduce 2-hour plasma glucose as compared to OGTT-0 (12.6 ± 2.2 vs 12.6 ± 3.9 mmol/l).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Aerobic exercise intensity was very low in our patients with CHD and T2DM. Postprandial plasma glucose was reduced only by aerobic exercise. Larger studies on the optimal exercise intensity are needed in this patient cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":43231,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":"9 1","pages":"3-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/XCE.0000000000000188","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCE.0000000000000188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

In patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), physical activity is strongly advised as nonpharmacological therapy. In general, a moderate aerobic exercise intensity is recommended. It was also proposed, however, that greater intensities tend to yield even greater benefits in HbA1c. Hence, the most appropriate exercise intensity seems not to be established yet. We compared the effect of moderate (aerobic) and vigorous (anaerobic) activity on postprandial plasma glucose.

Methods: In 10 consecutive patients (63 ± 12 years, BMI 28.3 ± 2.6 kg/m2, fasting plasma glucose 6.1 ± 1.2 mmol/l), 2-hour plasma glucose was ≥11.1 mmol/l in the oral glucose tolerance test at rest (OGTT-0). Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPX) was performed until a respiratory exchange ratio (RER) ≥1.20, beeing anaerobic (CPX-1), followed by OGTT-1. A steady-state CPX of 30-minute duration was performed targeting an RER between 0.90 and 0.95, being aerobic (CPX-2), followed by OGTT-2.

Results: In CPX-1, maximum exercise intensity (maxIntensity) averaged at 99 ± 30 Watt and peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak) reached 15.9 ± 2.8 ml/min/kg. In CPX-2, aerobic intensity averaged at 29 ± 9 Watt, representing 31% of maxIntensity and 61% of VO2peak. After aerobic exercise, 2-hour plasma glucose was significantly reduced to an average of 9.4 ± 2.3 mmol/l (P < 0.05). Anaerobic exercise did not reduce 2-hour plasma glucose as compared to OGTT-0 (12.6 ± 2.2 vs 12.6 ± 3.9 mmol/l).

Conclusion: Aerobic exercise intensity was very low in our patients with CHD and T2DM. Postprandial plasma glucose was reduced only by aerobic exercise. Larger studies on the optimal exercise intensity are needed in this patient cohort.

有氧和无氧运动对冠心病和2型糖尿病患者糖耐量的影响
对于冠心病(CHD)和2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者,强烈建议将体育活动作为非药物治疗。一般来说,建议进行中等强度的有氧运动。然而,也有人提出,更大的治疗强度对HbA1c的益处更大。因此,最合适的运动强度似乎还没有确定。我们比较了中度(有氧)和剧烈(无氧)运动对餐后血糖的影响。方法:连续10例患者(63±12年,BMI 28.3±2.6 kg/m2,空腹血糖6.1±1.2 mmol/l),口服静息糖耐量试验(OGTT-0) 2小时血糖≥11.1 mmol/l。进行心肺运动试验(CPX),直至呼吸交换比(RER)≥1.20,为无氧(CPX-1),再进行OGTT-1。针对RER在0.90到0.95之间进行持续30分钟的稳态CPX,有氧(CPX-2),然后是OGTT-2。结果:CPX-1的最大运动强度(maxIntensity)平均为99±30瓦特,最大耗氧量(VO2peak)达到15.9±2.8 ml/min/kg。在CPX-2中,有氧强度平均为29±9瓦特,代表最大强度的31%和VO2peak的61%。有氧运动后2小时血糖显著降低,平均为9.4±2.3 mmol/l (P)。结论:有氧运动强度在冠心病合并T2DM患者中非常低。餐后血糖仅通过有氧运动降低。在该患者队列中,需要对最佳运动强度进行更大规模的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Endocrinology & Metabolism
Cardiovascular Endocrinology & Metabolism CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信