{"title":"Should we transfer poor quality embryos?","authors":"Anastasia Kirillova, Sergey Lysenkov, Maria Farmakovskaya, Yulia Kiseleva, Bella Martazanova, Nona Mishieva, Aydar Abubakirov, Gennady Sukhikh","doi":"10.1186/s40738-020-00072-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate if it is safe and effective to transfer poor quality embryos.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>It was a retrospective analysis using individual patient data with positive controls. All patients undergoing embryo transfers of poor quality embryos on day 3 or on day 5 as part of fresh In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) cycles performed between 2012 and 2016. This study assessed a total of 738 poor quality embryos from 488 IVF programs. 261 embryo transfers were performed on day 3 (402 embryos were transferred) and 227 on day 5 (336 embryos were transferred). Control group consisted of 9893 fair and good quality embryos from 5994 IVF programs. Outcome rates were compared with two-tailed Fisher exact test using fisher.test function in R software. 95% confidence intervals for proportions were calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method with binom.test function in R. The groups of patients with poor vs. good and fair quality embryos were compared by age, body mass index(BMI), number of oocytes, female and male main diagnosis, cycle type, controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocol, the starting day of gonadotropin administration, the starting dose of gonadotropins, the total dose of gonadotropins, the total number of days of gonadotropins administration, the starting day of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist administration, the total number of ampoules of GnRH-agonist used, day of the trigger of ovulation administration and the type of the trigger of ovulation using the Student's t-test for interval variables and with the chi-square test for nominal variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences in the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, live births, and the number of children born were found between the groups of poor quality embryos transferred on day 3 and day 5. Though the implantation rate was lower for the group of poor quality embryos, than for the control (13.9% vs 37.2%), statistically significant differences between the proportion of implanted embryos which resulted in clinical pregnancies and live births in both groups were not observed (72% vs 78.2 and 55.8% vs 62.0% respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Transfer of poor quality embryos at either day 3 or day 5 have a low potential for implantation, though those embryos which successfully implanted have the same potential for live birth as the embryos of fair and good quality. This study supports that it is safe to transfer poor quality embryos when they are the only option for fresh embryo transfer (ET).</p>","PeriodicalId":87254,"journal":{"name":"Fertility research and practice","volume":"6 ","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40738-020-00072-5","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40738-020-00072-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19
Abstract
Background: To evaluate if it is safe and effective to transfer poor quality embryos.
Methods: It was a retrospective analysis using individual patient data with positive controls. All patients undergoing embryo transfers of poor quality embryos on day 3 or on day 5 as part of fresh In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) cycles performed between 2012 and 2016. This study assessed a total of 738 poor quality embryos from 488 IVF programs. 261 embryo transfers were performed on day 3 (402 embryos were transferred) and 227 on day 5 (336 embryos were transferred). Control group consisted of 9893 fair and good quality embryos from 5994 IVF programs. Outcome rates were compared with two-tailed Fisher exact test using fisher.test function in R software. 95% confidence intervals for proportions were calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method with binom.test function in R. The groups of patients with poor vs. good and fair quality embryos were compared by age, body mass index(BMI), number of oocytes, female and male main diagnosis, cycle type, controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocol, the starting day of gonadotropin administration, the starting dose of gonadotropins, the total dose of gonadotropins, the total number of days of gonadotropins administration, the starting day of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist administration, the total number of ampoules of GnRH-agonist used, day of the trigger of ovulation administration and the type of the trigger of ovulation using the Student's t-test for interval variables and with the chi-square test for nominal variables.
Results: No significant differences in the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, live births, and the number of children born were found between the groups of poor quality embryos transferred on day 3 and day 5. Though the implantation rate was lower for the group of poor quality embryos, than for the control (13.9% vs 37.2%), statistically significant differences between the proportion of implanted embryos which resulted in clinical pregnancies and live births in both groups were not observed (72% vs 78.2 and 55.8% vs 62.0% respectively).
Conclusion: Transfer of poor quality embryos at either day 3 or day 5 have a low potential for implantation, though those embryos which successfully implanted have the same potential for live birth as the embryos of fair and good quality. This study supports that it is safe to transfer poor quality embryos when they are the only option for fresh embryo transfer (ET).
目的:评价劣质胚胎移植的安全性和有效性。方法:采用个体患者资料和阳性对照进行回顾性分析。所有在2012年至2016年期间进行新鲜体外受精(IVF)周期的第3天或第5天接受劣质胚胎胚胎移植的患者。这项研究评估了来自488个体外受精项目的738个质量差的胚胎。第3天进行胚胎移植261例(402例),第5天进行227例(336例)。对照组由来自5994个体外受精项目的9893个质量良好的胚胎组成。采用Fisher精确检验比较转归率。测试功能在R软件。比例的95%置信区间采用二值化的Clopper-Pearson方法计算。测试函数在r组患者与良好和公平的质量差的胚胎相比,年龄、身体质量指数(BMI)、卵母细胞的数量,女性和男性主要诊断、循环类型,控制卵巢刺激(COS)协议,促性腺激素管理的开始一天,起始剂量的促性腺激素,总剂量的促性腺激素,促性腺激素的总天数,开始一天的促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)受体激动剂,使用gnrh激动剂的总安瓿数,触发排卵的给药天数和触发排卵的类型,使用间隔变量的学生t检验和标称变量的卡方检验。结果:第3天与第5天劣质胚胎移植组的着床率、临床妊娠率、流产率、活产率、出生数均无显著差异。虽然胚胎质量差组的着床率低于对照组(13.9% vs 37.2%),但两组临床妊娠和活产的胚胎着床率差异无统计学意义(分别为72% vs 78.2和55.8% vs 62.0%)。结论:移植质量差的胚胎在第3天或第5天的着床潜力都很低,但成功着床的胚胎与质量良好的胚胎有相同的活产潜力。本研究表明,当劣质胚胎是新鲜胚胎移植(ET)的唯一选择时,移植它们是安全的。