Learning Personalized Treatment Rules from Electronic Health Records Using Topic Modeling Feature Extraction.

Peng Wu, Tianchen Xu, Yuanjia Wang
{"title":"Learning Personalized Treatment Rules from Electronic Health Records Using Topic Modeling Feature Extraction.","authors":"Peng Wu, Tianchen Xu, Yuanjia Wang","doi":"10.1109/dsaa.2019.00054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To address substantial heterogeneity in patient response to treatment of chronic disorders and achieve the promise of precision medicine, individualized treatment rules (ITRs) are estimated to tailor treatments according to patient-specific characteristics. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide gold standard data for learning ITRs not subject to confounding bias. However, RCTs are often conducted under stringent inclusion/exclusion criteria, and participants in RCTs may not reflect the general patient population. Thus, ITRs learned from RCTs lack generalizability to the broader real world patient population. Real world databases such as electronic health records (EHRs) provide new resources as complements to RCTs to facilitate evidence-based research for personalized medicine. However, to ensure the validity of ITRs learned from EHRs, a number of challenges including confounding bias and selection bias must be addressed. In this work, we propose a matching-based machine learning method to estimate optimal individualized treatment rules from EHRs using interpretable features extracted from EHR documentation of medications and ICD diagnoses codes. We use a latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) model to extract latent topics and weights as features for learning ITRs. Our method achieves confounding reduction in observational studies through matching treated and untreated individuals and improves treatment optimization by augmenting feature space with clinically meaningful LDA-based features. We apply the method to EHR data collected at New York Presbyterian Hospital clinical data warehouse in studying optimal second-line treatment for type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients. We use cross validation to show that ITRs outperforms uniform treatment strategies (i.e., assigning same treatment to all individuals), and including topic modeling features leads to more reduction of post-treatment complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":92122,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics. IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7035126/pdf/nihms-1557992.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics. IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/dsaa.2019.00054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To address substantial heterogeneity in patient response to treatment of chronic disorders and achieve the promise of precision medicine, individualized treatment rules (ITRs) are estimated to tailor treatments according to patient-specific characteristics. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide gold standard data for learning ITRs not subject to confounding bias. However, RCTs are often conducted under stringent inclusion/exclusion criteria, and participants in RCTs may not reflect the general patient population. Thus, ITRs learned from RCTs lack generalizability to the broader real world patient population. Real world databases such as electronic health records (EHRs) provide new resources as complements to RCTs to facilitate evidence-based research for personalized medicine. However, to ensure the validity of ITRs learned from EHRs, a number of challenges including confounding bias and selection bias must be addressed. In this work, we propose a matching-based machine learning method to estimate optimal individualized treatment rules from EHRs using interpretable features extracted from EHR documentation of medications and ICD diagnoses codes. We use a latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) model to extract latent topics and weights as features for learning ITRs. Our method achieves confounding reduction in observational studies through matching treated and untreated individuals and improves treatment optimization by augmenting feature space with clinically meaningful LDA-based features. We apply the method to EHR data collected at New York Presbyterian Hospital clinical data warehouse in studying optimal second-line treatment for type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients. We use cross validation to show that ITRs outperforms uniform treatment strategies (i.e., assigning same treatment to all individuals), and including topic modeling features leads to more reduction of post-treatment complications.

利用主题建模特征提取从电子健康记录中学习个性化治疗规则。
为了解决患者对慢性疾病治疗反应的严重异质性问题,并实现精准医疗的承诺,我们对个体化治疗规则(ITR)进行了估算,以便根据患者的特异性特征调整治疗方法。随机对照试验(RCT)为学习不受混杂偏倚影响的个体化治疗规则提供了黄金标准数据。然而,随机对照试验通常是在严格的纳入/排除标准下进行的,而且随机对照试验的参与者可能无法反映普通患者群体。因此,从 RCT 中学习到的 ITR 缺乏对更广泛的现实世界患者群体的普适性。电子健康记录(EHR)等现实世界的数据库提供了新的资源,可作为 RCT 的补充,促进个性化医学的循证研究。然而,为了确保从电子病历中获得的 ITR 的有效性,必须解决包括混杂偏倚和选择偏倚在内的一系列难题。在这项工作中,我们提出了一种基于匹配的机器学习方法,利用从电子病历的药物和 ICD 诊断代码文档中提取的可解释特征,从电子病历中估计最佳个体化治疗规则。我们使用潜在 Dirichlet 分配(LDA)模型提取潜在主题和权重作为学习 ITR 的特征。我们的方法通过匹配接受治疗和未接受治疗的个体来减少观察性研究中的混杂因素,并通过使用具有临床意义的基于 LDA 的特征来扩展特征空间来改进治疗优化。我们将该方法应用于纽约长老会医院临床数据仓库收集的电子病历数据,研究 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者的最佳二线治疗。我们使用交叉验证表明,ITRs优于统一治疗策略(即对所有个体分配相同的治疗),而且包含主题建模特征可更多地减少治疗后并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信