The effect of additional drug therapy as metaphylaxis in patients with cystinuria: a systematic review.

Q1 Medicine
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica Pub Date : 2020-08-01 Epub Date: 2020-02-19 DOI:10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03704-2
Indra M Melessen, Michaël M Henderickx, Maria M Merkx, Faridi S van Etten-Jamaludin, Jaap J Homan van der Heide, Guido M Kamphuis
{"title":"The effect of additional drug therapy as metaphylaxis in patients with cystinuria: a systematic review.","authors":"Indra M Melessen,&nbsp;Michaël M Henderickx,&nbsp;Maria M Merkx,&nbsp;Faridi S van Etten-Jamaludin,&nbsp;Jaap J Homan van der Heide,&nbsp;Guido M Kamphuis","doi":"10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03704-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To systematically review the effect of additional drug therapy as metaphylaxis in patients with cystinuria.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A literature search of three databases (MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library) was performed according to the PRISMA-guidelines enclosing articles published up to May 2019. A total of 1117 articles were screened. Thirty-four publications met the inclusion criteria for this review.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Male-female ratio in the studied cohorts was 49.9% - 50.1%. The majority of studies showed a positive effect in reducing stone events and/or urinary cystine excretion. D-Penicillamine showed success in 13/14 (92%) studies, whereas Tiopronin-treatment showed a reduction in all (8/8; 100%) studies. All studies on Captopril (4/4) showed a decrease, however not all significant. The same is true for studies on Thiols in combination with Captopril (2/2). Furthermore, Tiopronin showed less side effects compared to D-penicillamine, respectively 30% and 37%. Captopril showed the least adverse events, with one event in nine patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The evidence on benefit of additional drug therapy in patients with cystinuria is scarce. All studied medications showed an effect on stone event and urinary cystine excretion, when used in addition to hyperhydration, alkalization and a diet low on methionine. Based on this systematic review, no drug can be preferred over another. An important aspect in the choice of drug is the risk of side effects. Therefore, the choice of additional drug should be personalized for every patient where the risk of side effects should be taken into consideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":49015,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","volume":"72 4","pages":"427-440"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03704-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To systematically review the effect of additional drug therapy as metaphylaxis in patients with cystinuria.

Evidence acquisition: A literature search of three databases (MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library) was performed according to the PRISMA-guidelines enclosing articles published up to May 2019. A total of 1117 articles were screened. Thirty-four publications met the inclusion criteria for this review.

Evidence synthesis: Male-female ratio in the studied cohorts was 49.9% - 50.1%. The majority of studies showed a positive effect in reducing stone events and/or urinary cystine excretion. D-Penicillamine showed success in 13/14 (92%) studies, whereas Tiopronin-treatment showed a reduction in all (8/8; 100%) studies. All studies on Captopril (4/4) showed a decrease, however not all significant. The same is true for studies on Thiols in combination with Captopril (2/2). Furthermore, Tiopronin showed less side effects compared to D-penicillamine, respectively 30% and 37%. Captopril showed the least adverse events, with one event in nine patients.

Conclusions: The evidence on benefit of additional drug therapy in patients with cystinuria is scarce. All studied medications showed an effect on stone event and urinary cystine excretion, when used in addition to hyperhydration, alkalization and a diet low on methionine. Based on this systematic review, no drug can be preferred over another. An important aspect in the choice of drug is the risk of side effects. Therefore, the choice of additional drug should be personalized for every patient where the risk of side effects should be taken into consideration.

作为过敏反应的附加药物治疗对胱氨酸尿病患者的影响:一项系统综述。
前言:系统回顾胱氨酸尿病患者附加药物治疗作为过敏反应的效果。证据获取:根据prism指南对三个数据库(MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane Library)进行文献检索,并包含截至2019年5月发表的文章。共筛选1117篇文章。34篇出版物符合本综述的纳入标准。证据综合:研究队列中的男女比例为49.9% - 50.1%。大多数研究显示在减少结石事件和/或尿胱氨酸排泄方面有积极作用。d -青霉胺在13/14(92%)的研究中显示成功,而硫普罗宁治疗显示所有(8/8;100%)的研究。卡托普利的所有研究(4/4)都显示出下降,但并非都是显著的。硫醇与卡托普利联合使用的研究也是如此(2/2)。此外,与d -青霉胺相比,硫普罗宁的副作用较小,分别为30%和37%。卡托普利表现出最少的不良事件,9例患者中有1例不良事件。结论:胱氨酸尿病患者额外药物治疗的获益证据很少。所有被研究的药物都表明,在过度饮水、碱化和低蛋氨酸饮食的同时使用,对结石事件和尿胱氨酸排泄有影响。基于这一系统综述,没有一种药物可以优于另一种。选择药物的一个重要方面是副作用的风险。因此,额外药物的选择应针对每位患者,并考虑到副作用的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica publishes scientific papers on nephrology and urology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of Minerva opinion editorials, editorial comments, original articles, video illustrated articles, review articles and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信