Applicability of Cameriere European formula for age estimation of 10-15 years legal threshold in South Indian population.

Journal of forensic dental sciences Pub Date : 2019-05-01 Epub Date: 2020-01-24 DOI:10.4103/jfo.jfds_72_19
Ashalata Gannepalli, Sudheer B Balla, Venkat Baghirath Pacha, D B Gandhi Babu, B Hari Vinay, Shilpa Perkari
{"title":"Applicability of Cameriere European formula for age estimation of 10-15 years legal threshold in South Indian population.","authors":"Ashalata Gannepalli, Sudheer B Balla, Venkat Baghirath Pacha, D B Gandhi Babu, B Hari Vinay, Shilpa Perkari","doi":"10.4103/jfo.jfds_72_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the present study is to assess the relationship between chronological age (CA) and the measurement of the open apices in teeth and also assess the accuracy of Cameriere methods on dental age (DA) estimation in the South Indian population.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>A sample of 200 orthopantomographs of children aged between 10 and 15 years were collected. The seven left permanent mandibular teeth were evaluated with Cameriere method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regression analysis was carried out which derived the following linear regression formula: Age = 14.117 - 0.01 g - 1.732W3 + 0.016N<sub>0</sub> - 0.289 × 5 - 0.099.s. N<sub>0.</sub> The equation explained 88.3% (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.883) of the total deviance. The accuracy of the European formula and South Indian formula was determined by the difference between the estimated DA and CA. Cameriere formula produced 32% and 18% of absolute residuals falls within the range of ± 1 and ± 0.5 years, whereas the new regression formula produced 72% and 35% within range of ± 1 and ± 0.5 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This further highlight the importance of population-specific formula keeping in mind about variation in dental maturation across different regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":89172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic dental sciences","volume":"11 2","pages":"78-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3c/ed/JFDS-11-78.PMC7006307.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic dental sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfo.jfds_72_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the present study is to assess the relationship between chronological age (CA) and the measurement of the open apices in teeth and also assess the accuracy of Cameriere methods on dental age (DA) estimation in the South Indian population.

Subjects and methods: A sample of 200 orthopantomographs of children aged between 10 and 15 years were collected. The seven left permanent mandibular teeth were evaluated with Cameriere method.

Results: Regression analysis was carried out which derived the following linear regression formula: Age = 14.117 - 0.01 g - 1.732W3 + 0.016N0 - 0.289 × 5 - 0.099.s. N0. The equation explained 88.3% (R 2 = 0.883) of the total deviance. The accuracy of the European formula and South Indian formula was determined by the difference between the estimated DA and CA. Cameriere formula produced 32% and 18% of absolute residuals falls within the range of ± 1 and ± 0.5 years, whereas the new regression formula produced 72% and 35% within range of ± 1 and ± 0.5 years.

Conclusion: This further highlight the importance of population-specific formula keeping in mind about variation in dental maturation across different regions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

卡梅里埃欧洲公式适用于南印度人口 10-15 岁法定年龄的估算。
目的:本研究的目的是评估南印度人群的计时年龄(CA)与牙齿开尖测量之间的关系,同时评估卡美瑞方法在估计牙龄(DA)方面的准确性:收集了 200 个 10 至 15 岁儿童的正畸照片样本。结果:通过回归分析得出了南印度儿童的牙龄:进行了回归分析,得出以下线性回归公式:年龄 = 14.117 - 0.01 g - 1.732W3 + 0.016N0 - 0.289 × 5 - 0.099.s. N0。该公式解释了总偏差的 88.3%(R 2 = 0.883)。欧洲公式和南印度公式的准确性由估计的 DA 和 CA 之间的差异决定。卡梅里埃公式产生的 32% 和 18% 的绝对残差在 ± 1 和 ± 0.5 年的范围内,而新回归公式产生的 72% 和 35% 的绝对残差在 ± 1 和 ± 0.5 年的范围内:结论:这进一步突出了针对特定人群的公式的重要性,同时考虑到不同地区牙齿成熟度的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书