Beyond Patient Satisfaction: Optimizing the Patient Experience.

Q4 Medicine
Jennifer L Hefner, Ann Scheck McAlearney, Nicole Spatafora, Susan D Moffatt-Bruce
{"title":"Beyond Patient Satisfaction: Optimizing the Patient Experience.","authors":"Jennifer L Hefner,&nbsp;Ann Scheck McAlearney,&nbsp;Nicole Spatafora,&nbsp;Susan D Moffatt-Bruce","doi":"10.1108/S1474-823120190000018010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>High patient satisfaction is not simply a customer service goal; it is an important dimension of quality and part of financial incentives and public reporting requirements. However, patient experience is often siloed within health system organizational charts and considered separately from quality and safety initiatives, instead of being seen predominantly as a \"customer service\" initiative. Representatives from 52 health care systems across the United States completed an online survey to explore both the processes and infrastructure hospitals employ to improve patient experience, and the metrics hospitals use to assess the quality of patient experience beyond patient satisfaction survey data. When asked about performance metrics beyond satisfaction, most hospitals or systems noted other metrics of the entire patient experience such as the rate of complaints or grievances and direct feedback from patient and family advisors. Additionally, respondents suggested that a broader definition of \"quality of the patient experience\" may be appropriate to encompass measures of access, clinical processes, and quality of care and patient safety outcomes. Almost all respondents that we surveyed listed metrics from these less traditional categories, indicating that performance improvement within the patient experience domain in these organizations is linked with other areas of hospital performance that rely on the same metrics, such as clinical quality and patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":35465,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Care Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/S1474-823120190000018010","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Care Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-823120190000018010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

High patient satisfaction is not simply a customer service goal; it is an important dimension of quality and part of financial incentives and public reporting requirements. However, patient experience is often siloed within health system organizational charts and considered separately from quality and safety initiatives, instead of being seen predominantly as a "customer service" initiative. Representatives from 52 health care systems across the United States completed an online survey to explore both the processes and infrastructure hospitals employ to improve patient experience, and the metrics hospitals use to assess the quality of patient experience beyond patient satisfaction survey data. When asked about performance metrics beyond satisfaction, most hospitals or systems noted other metrics of the entire patient experience such as the rate of complaints or grievances and direct feedback from patient and family advisors. Additionally, respondents suggested that a broader definition of "quality of the patient experience" may be appropriate to encompass measures of access, clinical processes, and quality of care and patient safety outcomes. Almost all respondents that we surveyed listed metrics from these less traditional categories, indicating that performance improvement within the patient experience domain in these organizations is linked with other areas of hospital performance that rely on the same metrics, such as clinical quality and patient safety.

超越患者满意度:优化患者体验。
高患者满意度不仅仅是客户服务的目标;它是质量的一个重要方面,也是财政奖励和公开报告要求的一部分。然而,患者体验往往被孤立在卫生系统组织图中,并与质量和安全举措分开考虑,而不是主要被视为“客户服务”举措。来自美国52个医疗保健系统的代表完成了一项在线调查,以探索医院为改善患者体验所采用的流程和基础设施,以及医院用来评估患者体验质量的指标,而不仅仅是患者满意度调查数据。当被问及满意度以外的绩效指标时,大多数医院或系统都会注意到整个患者体验的其他指标,例如投诉或不满的比率以及患者和家属顾问的直接反馈。此外,受访者建议,“患者体验质量”的更广泛定义可能适合于包括获取、临床过程、护理质量和患者安全结果的措施。我们调查的几乎所有受访者都列出了这些不太传统的类别的指标,这表明这些组织中患者体验领域的绩效改进与依赖于相同指标的医院绩效的其他领域(如临床质量和患者安全)相关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Health Care Management
Advances in Health Care Management Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信