A pilot study of a stepped-care brief intervention to help psychologically-distressed women displaced by conflict in Bogotá, Colombia.

Global mental health (Cambridge, England) Pub Date : 2019-12-02 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1017/gmh.2019.26
J M Shultz, H Verdeli, Á Gómez Ceballos, L J Hernandez, Z Espinel, L Helpman, Y Neria, R Araya
{"title":"A pilot study of a stepped-care brief intervention to help psychologically-distressed women displaced by conflict in Bogotá, Colombia.","authors":"J M Shultz,&nbsp;H Verdeli,&nbsp;Á Gómez Ceballos,&nbsp;L J Hernandez,&nbsp;Z Espinel,&nbsp;L Helpman,&nbsp;Y Neria,&nbsp;R Araya","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2019.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colombia's 6.5 million internally displaced persons (IDPs) have been exposed to trauma, loss, and hardships. Common mental disorders (CMDs) are prevalent in this group, yet there are few evidence-based psychosocial interventions for this population. We assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a stepped-care intervention for women IDPs in Bogota, Colombia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Feasibility to recruit participants for an intervention trial, to screen for CMDs and displacement-related traumas, to refer high-risk cases to professional consultation, to implement evidence-based interpersonal counseling (IPC) for women with diagnosed CMDs, to retain participants in the intervention, and to conduct follow-up assessments was assessed. Assessment instruments were validated. The intervention was delivered by trained outreach personnel. Intervention acceptability was assessed by monitoring session attendance, dropout rates, and satisfaction. Potential efficacy was evaluated with pre- and post-intervention measures of CMDs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 279 women IDPs into the intervention. On screening, 177 (63.4%) had symptom levels suggesting a CMD. Participants endorsed a wide range of displacement-related exposures. Most participants receiving IPC decreased their symptom levels at follow-up. Many participants did not complete the recommended number of IPC sessions; loss to follow-up was 30%. The performance of the outreach personnel improved after the initial intervention team was replaced with community members trained to deliver the intervention. The Bogotá health system was unable to reliably accommodate emergency psychiatric referrals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IPC intervention shows promise, but significant challenges remain for improving reach, adherence, and participant retention. We identified strategies and partnerships to redress some of the main study limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":520633,"journal":{"name":"Global mental health (Cambridge, England)","volume":" ","pages":"e28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/gmh.2019.26","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global mental health (Cambridge, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2019.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Colombia's 6.5 million internally displaced persons (IDPs) have been exposed to trauma, loss, and hardships. Common mental disorders (CMDs) are prevalent in this group, yet there are few evidence-based psychosocial interventions for this population. We assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a stepped-care intervention for women IDPs in Bogota, Colombia.

Methods: Feasibility to recruit participants for an intervention trial, to screen for CMDs and displacement-related traumas, to refer high-risk cases to professional consultation, to implement evidence-based interpersonal counseling (IPC) for women with diagnosed CMDs, to retain participants in the intervention, and to conduct follow-up assessments was assessed. Assessment instruments were validated. The intervention was delivered by trained outreach personnel. Intervention acceptability was assessed by monitoring session attendance, dropout rates, and satisfaction. Potential efficacy was evaluated with pre- and post-intervention measures of CMDs.

Results: We recruited 279 women IDPs into the intervention. On screening, 177 (63.4%) had symptom levels suggesting a CMD. Participants endorsed a wide range of displacement-related exposures. Most participants receiving IPC decreased their symptom levels at follow-up. Many participants did not complete the recommended number of IPC sessions; loss to follow-up was 30%. The performance of the outreach personnel improved after the initial intervention team was replaced with community members trained to deliver the intervention. The Bogotá health system was unable to reliably accommodate emergency psychiatric referrals.

Conclusions: The IPC intervention shows promise, but significant challenges remain for improving reach, adherence, and participant retention. We identified strategies and partnerships to redress some of the main study limitations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在哥伦比亚波哥大,一项旨在帮助因冲突而流离失所的心理困扰妇女的阶梯式护理简短干预的试点研究。
背景:哥伦比亚650万国内流离失所者(IDPs)遭受创伤、损失和苦难。常见的精神障碍在这一群体中很普遍,但针对这一人群的循证心理社会干预措施却很少。我们评估了哥伦比亚波哥大妇女境内流离失所者阶梯式护理干预的可行性和可接受性。方法:评估干预试验招募参与者的可行性,筛查CMDs和流离失所相关创伤,将高危病例转介专业咨询,对诊断为CMDs的妇女实施循证人际咨询(IPC),保留参与者参与干预,并进行随访评估。对评估工具进行了验证。干预是由训练有素的外联人员提供的。干预可接受性通过监测会议出席率、辍学率和满意度来评估。通过CMDs干预前和干预后的措施评估潜在疗效。结果:我们招募了279名女性境内流离失所者参与干预。筛查时,177例(63.4%)有提示CMD的症状水平。与会者赞同广泛的与流离失所有关的暴露。大多数接受IPC治疗的参与者在随访时症状水平有所下降。许多参与者没有完成建议的IPC会议次数;随访损失为30%。在最初的干预小组被接受过干预培训的社区成员取代后,外展人员的表现有所改善。波哥大卫生系统无法可靠地接待紧急精神病转诊。结论:IPC干预显示出希望,但在改善覆盖范围、依从性和参与者保留方面仍存在重大挑战。我们确定了一些策略和伙伴关系,以纠正研究的一些主要局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信