Guidelines for the Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection: Recommendations from the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association and CDC, 2020.

IF 33.7 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Timothy R Sterling, Gibril Njie, Dominik Zenner, David L Cohn, Randall Reves, Amina Ahmed, Dick Menzies, C Robert Horsburgh, Charles M Crane, Marcos Burgos, Philip LoBue, Carla A Winston, Robert Belknap
{"title":"Guidelines for the Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection: Recommendations from the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association and CDC, 2020.","authors":"Timothy R Sterling,&nbsp;Gibril Njie,&nbsp;Dominik Zenner,&nbsp;David L Cohn,&nbsp;Randall Reves,&nbsp;Amina Ahmed,&nbsp;Dick Menzies,&nbsp;C Robert Horsburgh,&nbsp;Charles M Crane,&nbsp;Marcos Burgos,&nbsp;Philip LoBue,&nbsp;Carla A Winston,&nbsp;Robert Belknap","doi":"10.15585/mmwr.rr6901a1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Comprehensive guidelines for treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) among persons living in the United States were last published in 2000 (American Thoracic Society. CDC targeted tuberculin testing and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:S221-47). Since then, several new regimens have been evaluated in clinical trials. To update previous guidelines, the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association (NTCA) and CDC convened a committee to conduct a systematic literature review and make new recommendations for the most effective and least toxic regimens for treatment of LTBI among persons who live in the United States.The systematic literature review included clinical trials of regimens to treat LTBI. Quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low) from clinical trial comparisons was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. In addition, a network meta-analysis evaluated regimens that had not been compared directly in clinical trials. The effectiveness outcome was tuberculosis disease; the toxicity outcome was hepatotoxicity. Strong GRADE recommendations required at least moderate evidence of effectiveness and that the desirable consequences outweighed the undesirable consequences in the majority of patients. Conditional GRADE recommendations were made when determination of whether desirable consequences outweighed undesirable consequences was uncertain (e.g., with low-quality evidence).These updated 2020 LTBI treatment guidelines include the NTCA- and CDC-recommended treatment regimens that comprise three preferred rifamycin-based regimens and two alternative monotherapy regimens with daily isoniazid. All recommended treatment regimens are intended for persons infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis that is presumed to be susceptible to isoniazid or rifampin. These updated guidelines do not apply when evidence is available that the infecting M. tuberculosis strain is resistant to both isoniazid and rifampin; recommendations for treating contacts exposed to multidrug-resistant tuberculosis were published in 2019 (Nahid P, Mase SR Migliori GB, et al. Treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. An official ATS/CDC/ERS/IDSA clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019;200:e93-e142). The three rifamycin-based preferred regimens are 3 months of once-weekly isoniazid plus rifapentine, 4 months of daily rifampin, or 3 months of daily isoniazid plus rifampin. Prescribing providers or pharmacists who are unfamiliar with rifampin and rifapentine might confuse the two drugs. They are not interchangeable, and caution should be taken to ensure that patients receive the correct medication for the intended regimen. Preference for these rifamycin-based regimens was made on the basis of effectiveness, safety, and high treatment completion rates. The two alternative treatment regimens are daily isoniazid for 6 or 9 months; isoniazid monotherapy is efficacious but has higher toxicity risk and lower treatment completion rates than shorter rifamycin-based regimens.In summary, short-course (3- to 4-month) rifamycin-based treatment regimens are preferred over longer-course (6-9 month) isoniazid monotherapy for treatment of LTBI. These updated guidelines can be used by clinicians, public health officials, policymakers, health care organizations, and other state and local stakeholders who might need to adapt them to fit individual clinical circumstances.</p>","PeriodicalId":51328,"journal":{"name":"Mmwr Recommendations and Reports","volume":"69 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":33.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7041302/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mmwr Recommendations and Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.rr6901a1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comprehensive guidelines for treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) among persons living in the United States were last published in 2000 (American Thoracic Society. CDC targeted tuberculin testing and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:S221-47). Since then, several new regimens have been evaluated in clinical trials. To update previous guidelines, the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association (NTCA) and CDC convened a committee to conduct a systematic literature review and make new recommendations for the most effective and least toxic regimens for treatment of LTBI among persons who live in the United States.The systematic literature review included clinical trials of regimens to treat LTBI. Quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low) from clinical trial comparisons was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. In addition, a network meta-analysis evaluated regimens that had not been compared directly in clinical trials. The effectiveness outcome was tuberculosis disease; the toxicity outcome was hepatotoxicity. Strong GRADE recommendations required at least moderate evidence of effectiveness and that the desirable consequences outweighed the undesirable consequences in the majority of patients. Conditional GRADE recommendations were made when determination of whether desirable consequences outweighed undesirable consequences was uncertain (e.g., with low-quality evidence).These updated 2020 LTBI treatment guidelines include the NTCA- and CDC-recommended treatment regimens that comprise three preferred rifamycin-based regimens and two alternative monotherapy regimens with daily isoniazid. All recommended treatment regimens are intended for persons infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis that is presumed to be susceptible to isoniazid or rifampin. These updated guidelines do not apply when evidence is available that the infecting M. tuberculosis strain is resistant to both isoniazid and rifampin; recommendations for treating contacts exposed to multidrug-resistant tuberculosis were published in 2019 (Nahid P, Mase SR Migliori GB, et al. Treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. An official ATS/CDC/ERS/IDSA clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019;200:e93-e142). The three rifamycin-based preferred regimens are 3 months of once-weekly isoniazid plus rifapentine, 4 months of daily rifampin, or 3 months of daily isoniazid plus rifampin. Prescribing providers or pharmacists who are unfamiliar with rifampin and rifapentine might confuse the two drugs. They are not interchangeable, and caution should be taken to ensure that patients receive the correct medication for the intended regimen. Preference for these rifamycin-based regimens was made on the basis of effectiveness, safety, and high treatment completion rates. The two alternative treatment regimens are daily isoniazid for 6 or 9 months; isoniazid monotherapy is efficacious but has higher toxicity risk and lower treatment completion rates than shorter rifamycin-based regimens.In summary, short-course (3- to 4-month) rifamycin-based treatment regimens are preferred over longer-course (6-9 month) isoniazid monotherapy for treatment of LTBI. These updated guidelines can be used by clinicians, public health officials, policymakers, health care organizations, and other state and local stakeholders who might need to adapt them to fit individual clinical circumstances.

Abstract Image

潜伏性结核感染治疗指南:国家结核病控制协会和疾病预防控制中心的建议,2020年。
美国人治疗潜伏性结核感染(LTBI)的综合指南于2000年发表(美国胸科学会)。CDC靶向结核菌素检测与治疗潜伏性结核感染。[J] .中华呼吸与急救医学杂志;2009;31(2):591 - 591。从那时起,一些新的治疗方案已经在临床试验中进行了评估。为了更新以前的指南,国家结核病控制协会(NTCA)和疾病预防控制中心召集了一个委员会,进行了系统的文献综述,并就治疗居住在美国的LTBI的最有效和毒性最小的方案提出了新的建议。系统的文献综述包括治疗LTBI方案的临床试验。临床试验比较的证据质量(高、中、低或极低)采用推荐评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)标准进行评价。此外,一项网络荟萃分析评估了尚未在临床试验中直接比较的方案。疗效结局为肺结核;毒性结果为肝毒性。强烈的GRADE推荐要求至少有中等程度的有效性证据,并且在大多数患者中,理想的后果大于不良的后果。当不确定理想结果是否大于不良后果时(例如,低质量证据),提出条件GRADE建议。这些更新的2020年LTBI治疗指南包括NTCA和cdc推荐的治疗方案,包括三种首选利福霉素方案和两种每日异烟肼的替代单药治疗方案。所有推荐的治疗方案均适用于假定对异烟肼或利福平敏感的结核分枝杆菌感染者。当有证据表明感染结核分枝杆菌菌株对异烟肼和利福平都有耐药性时,这些更新的指南不适用;2019年发表了治疗耐多药结核病接触者的建议(Nahid P, Mase SR Migliori GB等)。耐药结核病的治疗。官方ATS/CDC/ERS/IDSA临床实践指南。[J] .中华呼吸与急救医学杂志;2009;33(2):391 - 391。以利福霉素为基础的三种首选方案是:3个月每周服用一次异烟肼加利福喷丁,4个月每天服用利福平,或3个月每天服用异烟肼加利福平。不熟悉利福平和利福喷丁的处方提供者或药剂师可能会混淆这两种药物。它们是不可互换的,应谨慎行事,以确保患者接受正确的药物治疗。这些以利福霉素为基础的方案是基于有效性、安全性和高治疗完成率而优选的。两种替代治疗方案是每天服用异烟肼6或9个月;异烟肼单药治疗有效,但毒性风险较高,治疗完成率低于较短的利福霉素治疗方案。总之,短期疗程(3- 4个月)利福霉素治疗方案优于长期疗程(6-9个月)异烟肼单药治疗。这些更新的指南可供临床医生、公共卫生官员、政策制定者、卫生保健组织以及其他可能需要对其进行调整以适应个人临床情况的州和地方利益相关者使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mmwr Recommendations and Reports
Mmwr Recommendations and Reports PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
36.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: The MMWR series of publications is published by the Office of Science, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), U.S. The MMWR Recommendations and Reports contain in-depth articles that relay policy statements for prevention and treatment in all areas in the CDC’s scope of responsibility (e.g., recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信