Systematic identification of critically ill and dying patients in primary care using the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE).

Q1 Medicine
GMS German Medical Science Pub Date : 2020-02-03 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.3205/000278
Kambiz Afshar, Birgitt Wiese, Nils Schneider, Gabriele Müller-Mundt
{"title":"Systematic identification of critically ill and dying patients in primary care using the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE).","authors":"Kambiz Afshar,&nbsp;Birgitt Wiese,&nbsp;Nils Schneider,&nbsp;Gabriele Müller-Mundt","doi":"10.3205/000278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The systematic identification of patients who are at risk of deteriorating and dying is the prerequisite for the provision of palliative care (PC). This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and practicability of the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE) for the systematic identification of these patients in general practice. <b>Methods:</b> In the beginning of 2017, twelve general practitioners (GPs; female n=6) were invited to take part in the study. GPs were asked to apply the SPICT-DE in everyday practice over a period of two months in patients with chronic progressive diseases. Six months after initial assessment, a follow-up survey revealed how the clinical situation of the initially identified patients had changed and which PC actions had been initiated by GPs. In addition, GPs gave feedback on the practicability of SPICT-DE in daily routine. <b>Results:</b> 10 of the 12 GPs (female n=5, median age 46 years, range 38-68) participated in both the two-month assessment period and the follow-up survey. A total of 79 patients (female n=40, median age 79 years, range 44-94) was assessed with the SPICT-DE. Main diagnoses were predominately of cardio-vascular (n=28) or oncological (n=26) origin. Follow-up after six months showed that 38 patients (48%) went through at least one crisis during the course of disease and almost one third (n=26) had died. The majority of GPs (n=7) considered the SPICT-DE to be practical in daily routine and helpful in identifying patients who might benefit from PC. Seven GPs indicated that they would use the SPICT-DE as part of everyday practice. <b>Conclusions:</b> The SPICT-DE seems to be a practical tool supporting the systematic identification of critically ill and dying patients in general practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":39243,"journal":{"name":"GMS German Medical Science","volume":"18 ","pages":"Doc02"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6997946/pdf/","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS German Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/000278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Objective: The systematic identification of patients who are at risk of deteriorating and dying is the prerequisite for the provision of palliative care (PC). This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and practicability of the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE) for the systematic identification of these patients in general practice. Methods: In the beginning of 2017, twelve general practitioners (GPs; female n=6) were invited to take part in the study. GPs were asked to apply the SPICT-DE in everyday practice over a period of two months in patients with chronic progressive diseases. Six months after initial assessment, a follow-up survey revealed how the clinical situation of the initially identified patients had changed and which PC actions had been initiated by GPs. In addition, GPs gave feedback on the practicability of SPICT-DE in daily routine. Results: 10 of the 12 GPs (female n=5, median age 46 years, range 38-68) participated in both the two-month assessment period and the follow-up survey. A total of 79 patients (female n=40, median age 79 years, range 44-94) was assessed with the SPICT-DE. Main diagnoses were predominately of cardio-vascular (n=28) or oncological (n=26) origin. Follow-up after six months showed that 38 patients (48%) went through at least one crisis during the course of disease and almost one third (n=26) had died. The majority of GPs (n=7) considered the SPICT-DE to be practical in daily routine and helpful in identifying patients who might benefit from PC. Seven GPs indicated that they would use the SPICT-DE as part of everyday practice. Conclusions: The SPICT-DE seems to be a practical tool supporting the systematic identification of critically ill and dying patients in general practice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用德文版本的支持和姑息治疗指标工具(SPICT-DE)系统地识别初级保健中的危重病人和垂死病人。
目的:系统地识别有恶化和死亡风险的患者是提供姑息治疗(PC)的先决条件。本研究旨在探讨德文版本的支持和姑息治疗指标工具(SPICT-DE)在全科实践中系统识别这些患者的可行性和实用性。方法:2017年初,12名全科医生(gp;女性n=6)被邀请参加研究。要求全科医生在患有慢性进行性疾病的患者的日常实践中应用spct - de,为期两个月。初步评估六个月后,一项随访调查揭示了最初确定的患者的临床情况如何发生变化,以及哪些PC行动是由全科医生发起的。此外,全科医生对spct - de在日常生活中的实用性进行了反馈。结果:12名全科医生中有10名(女性5名,中位年龄46岁,38 ~ 68岁)参加了为期2个月的评估期和随访调查。79例患者(女性40例,中位年龄79岁,44-94岁)采用SPICT-DE进行评估。主要诊断为心血管(n=28)或肿瘤(n=26)。6个月后的随访显示,38名患者(48%)在病程中经历了至少一次危机,近三分之一(n=26)死亡。大多数全科医生(n=7)认为SPICT-DE在日常生活中是实用的,有助于识别可能受益于PC的患者。7名全科医生表示,他们将使用spct - de作为日常实践的一部分。结论:SPICT-DE似乎是一个实用的工具,支持系统地识别危重病人和临终病人的一般做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GMS German Medical Science
GMS German Medical Science Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书