Septic patients with cancer: Do prehospital antibiotics improve survival? A sub-analysis of the PHANTASi trial.

4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Netherlands Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2020-02-01
R S Nannan Panday, S Wang, E H Schermer, T Cooksley, N Alam, P W B Nanayakkara
{"title":"Septic patients with cancer: Do prehospital antibiotics improve survival? A sub-analysis of the PHANTASi trial.","authors":"R S Nannan Panday,&nbsp;S Wang,&nbsp;E H Schermer,&nbsp;T Cooksley,&nbsp;N Alam,&nbsp;P W B Nanayakkara","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis in patients with cancer is increasingly common and associated with high mortality. To date, no studies have examined the effectiveness of prehospital antibiotics in septic patients with cancer. This study aimed without and to evaluate the effect of prehospital antibiotics in septic patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a post-hoc sub-analysis of the PHANTASi (PreHospital ANTibioitcs Against Sepsis) trial database: a randomised controlled trial which enrolled patients with suspected sepsis who were transported to the emergency department by ambulance. Patients in the intervention group were administered prehospital intravenous antibiotics while those in the control group received usual care. We compared patients who had cancer to those who did not. Primary outcome was 28-day mortality; among the secondary outcomes, we included in-hospital mortality and 90-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>357(13.4%) of the 2658 included patients had cancer in the past five years, of which, 209 (58.5%) were included in the intervention and 148 (41.5%) usual care groups; 28-day mortality was significantly higher in patients who were diagnosed with cancer in the past five years than those without cancer in the past five years: 15.2% vs. 7.1%, respectively (p < 0.001). Prehospital antibiotics in the group of patients with cancer in the last five years yielded no significant effect on survival. There were however, significantly fewer 30-day readmissions (p = 0.031) in the intervention group of cancer patients (12.2% vs 5.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prehospital antibiotics did not improve overall survival. However, there was a significant reduction in 30-day readmissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":18918,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands Journal of Medicine","volume":"78 1","pages":"3-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Netherlands Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sepsis in patients with cancer is increasingly common and associated with high mortality. To date, no studies have examined the effectiveness of prehospital antibiotics in septic patients with cancer. This study aimed without and to evaluate the effect of prehospital antibiotics in septic patients with cancer.

Methods: We conducted a post-hoc sub-analysis of the PHANTASi (PreHospital ANTibioitcs Against Sepsis) trial database: a randomised controlled trial which enrolled patients with suspected sepsis who were transported to the emergency department by ambulance. Patients in the intervention group were administered prehospital intravenous antibiotics while those in the control group received usual care. We compared patients who had cancer to those who did not. Primary outcome was 28-day mortality; among the secondary outcomes, we included in-hospital mortality and 90-day mortality.

Results: 357(13.4%) of the 2658 included patients had cancer in the past five years, of which, 209 (58.5%) were included in the intervention and 148 (41.5%) usual care groups; 28-day mortality was significantly higher in patients who were diagnosed with cancer in the past five years than those without cancer in the past five years: 15.2% vs. 7.1%, respectively (p < 0.001). Prehospital antibiotics in the group of patients with cancer in the last five years yielded no significant effect on survival. There were however, significantly fewer 30-day readmissions (p = 0.031) in the intervention group of cancer patients (12.2% vs 5.7%).

Conclusion: Prehospital antibiotics did not improve overall survival. However, there was a significant reduction in 30-day readmissions.

脓毒性癌症患者:院前抗生素能提高生存率吗?PHANTASi试验的亚分析。
背景:败血症在癌症患者中越来越常见,且与高死亡率相关。到目前为止,还没有研究检查院前抗生素对脓毒症癌症患者的有效性。本研究旨在评估院前抗生素对脓毒症合并癌症患者的影响。方法:我们对PHANTASi(院前抗生素抗败血症)试验数据库进行了事后亚分析:这是一项随机对照试验,纳入了由救护车运送到急诊室的疑似败血症患者。干预组患者院前静脉注射抗生素,对照组患者接受常规护理。我们将患有癌症的患者与未患癌症的患者进行了比较。主要终点为28天死亡率;次要结局包括住院死亡率和90天死亡率。结果:纳入的2658例患者中有357例(13.4%)在过去5年内发生过癌症,其中干预组209例(58.5%),常规护理组148例(41.5%);过去5年确诊癌症的患者28天死亡率明显高于过去5年未确诊癌症的患者:分别为15.2%和7.1% (p < 0.001)。院前抗生素在过去5年的癌症患者组中对生存没有显著影响。然而,干预组癌症患者的30天再入院率明显减少(p = 0.031) (12.2% vs 5.7%)。结论:院前抗生素不能提高总生存率。然而,30天内再次入院的人数显著减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Netherlands Journal of Medicine
Netherlands Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Netherlands Journal of Medicine publishes papers in all relevant fields of internal medicine. In addition to reports of original clinical and experimental studies, reviews on topics of interest or importance, case reports, book reviews and letters to the editor are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信