Logic Model of the Department of Veterans Affairs' Role in Veterans Treatment Courts.

Drug court review Pub Date : 2019-01-01
Andrea K Finlay, Sean Clark, Jessica Blue-Howells, Sherri Claudio, Matthew Stimmel, Jack Tsai, Alec Buchanan, Joel Rosenthal, Alex H S Harris, Susan Frayne
{"title":"Logic Model of the Department of Veterans Affairs' Role in Veterans Treatment Courts.","authors":"Andrea K Finlay,&nbsp;Sean Clark,&nbsp;Jessica Blue-Howells,&nbsp;Sherri Claudio,&nbsp;Matthew Stimmel,&nbsp;Jack Tsai,&nbsp;Alec Buchanan,&nbsp;Joel Rosenthal,&nbsp;Alex H S Harris,&nbsp;Susan Frayne","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Veterans Treatment Courts (VTCs) grew exponentially in the last decade with more than 550 courts, dockets and tracks operating in the U.S. Eligibility criteria and operating practices of VTCs vary widely. Existing logic models guide the activities of these courts, but do not explicitly address the distinct missions and priorities of different agencies that support VTCs. To facilitate communication and research to address this gap, we propose a logic model of the Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA) role in VTCs. To construct the VA-VTC logic model, we adapted an existing logic model and held expert panels with VA staff, clinical leaders and researchers to discuss and refine the model. The VA-VTC logic model is a novel contribution to current thinking about VTCs and clarifies the potential resources, activities, outputs, outcomes and population impacts that are under the purview of the VA. Explicitly recognizing the VA as a separate partner in VTCs, this logic model can be a tool for communication with criminal justice agencies to facilitate broader discussions about the mechanisms driving VTC outcomes. This model can also be continuously updated as we learn from research and evaluation efforts about VTCs, ultimate improving the effectiveness of the VA's role in these courts.</p>","PeriodicalId":90486,"journal":{"name":"Drug court review","volume":"2 ","pages":"45-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6996232/pdf/nihms-1038038.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug court review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Veterans Treatment Courts (VTCs) grew exponentially in the last decade with more than 550 courts, dockets and tracks operating in the U.S. Eligibility criteria and operating practices of VTCs vary widely. Existing logic models guide the activities of these courts, but do not explicitly address the distinct missions and priorities of different agencies that support VTCs. To facilitate communication and research to address this gap, we propose a logic model of the Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA) role in VTCs. To construct the VA-VTC logic model, we adapted an existing logic model and held expert panels with VA staff, clinical leaders and researchers to discuss and refine the model. The VA-VTC logic model is a novel contribution to current thinking about VTCs and clarifies the potential resources, activities, outputs, outcomes and population impacts that are under the purview of the VA. Explicitly recognizing the VA as a separate partner in VTCs, this logic model can be a tool for communication with criminal justice agencies to facilitate broader discussions about the mechanisms driving VTC outcomes. This model can also be continuously updated as we learn from research and evaluation efforts about VTCs, ultimate improving the effectiveness of the VA's role in these courts.

Abstract Image

退伍军人事务部在退伍军人待遇法庭中的角色逻辑模型。
退伍军人待遇法庭(VTCs)在过去十年中呈指数增长,在美国有超过550个法庭、法庭和轨道在运作。现有的逻辑模型指导了这些法院的活动,但没有明确解决支持职业培训委员会的不同机构的不同任务和优先事项。为了促进沟通和研究以解决这一差距,我们提出了退伍军人事务部(VA)在职业培训中心角色的逻辑模型。为了构建VA- vtc的逻辑模型,我们改编了现有的逻辑模型,并与VA员工、临床领导和研究人员举行了专家小组讨论和完善模型。职业训练局与职业训练局的逻辑模式,是对现时职业训练局思维的一项新贡献,它阐明了职业训练局职权范围内的潜在资源、活动、产出、成果和人口影响。该逻辑模式明确承认职业训练局是职业训练局的独立伙伴,可作为与刑事司法机构沟通的工具,促进就推动职业训练局成果的机制进行更广泛的讨论。随着我们从职业培训中心的研究和评估工作中吸取经验,这一模式也可以不断更新,最终提高退伍军人事务部在这些法庭中发挥作用的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信