Efficacy of traction, using a clip-with-thread, for esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal lesions with fibrosis in an ex vivo pig training model.

Mitsuru Esaki, Yosuke Minoda, Eikichi Ihara, Seiichiro Sakisaka, Shinichi Tsuruta, Taizo Hosokawa, Masafumi Wada, Yoshitaka Hata, Sho Suzuki, Aya Iwao, Shun Yamakawa, Akira Irie, Hirotada Akiho, Yoshihiro Ogawa
{"title":"Efficacy of traction, using a clip-with-thread, for esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal lesions with fibrosis in an ex vivo pig training model.","authors":"Mitsuru Esaki,&nbsp;Yosuke Minoda,&nbsp;Eikichi Ihara,&nbsp;Seiichiro Sakisaka,&nbsp;Shinichi Tsuruta,&nbsp;Taizo Hosokawa,&nbsp;Masafumi Wada,&nbsp;Yoshitaka Hata,&nbsp;Sho Suzuki,&nbsp;Aya Iwao,&nbsp;Shun Yamakawa,&nbsp;Akira Irie,&nbsp;Hirotada Akiho,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Ogawa","doi":"10.5152/tjg.2020.19207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of recurrent esophageal carcinoma is technically difficult to perform due to submucosal fibrosis that develops after definitive chemoradiation therapy. Therefore, our aim was to evaluate the usefulness of clip-with-thread traction for ESD of esophageal lesions with submucosal fibrosis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Four endoscopists excised 16 lesions by ESD in an ex vivo pig training model. Mock lesions (30 mm in diameter) were created, including a 10-mm area of submucosal fibrosis in the center of each lesion. Each endoscopist performed two ESDs with traction (ESD-T) and two without traction (ESD-N). The primary outcome was the time required for submucosal dissection. Secondary outcomes were the rate of en bloc (complete) resection and perforation during the procedure, and the total amount of solution injected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All esophageal ESDs were completed. The median dissection time was significantly shorter for the ESD-T group (median 12.5 min, interquartile range 10.2-14.5) when comparing to the ESD-N group (median 18.0 min, interquartile range 14.6-19.2) (P=0.040). The en bloc resection rate was 100% in both groups, with a rate of complete resection of 87.5% and a rate of perforation of 37.5% for both groups. The median amount of solution injected was not significantly different between the ESD-T (18.0 ml) and ESD-N (20.5 ml) groups (P=0.526).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clip-with-thread traction improved the performance of ESD for lesions with submucosal fibrosis. However, the method might not reduce the risk of perforation, which remains an important clinical issue to resolve.</p>","PeriodicalId":518528,"journal":{"name":"The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"58-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7075676/pdf/tjg-31-1-58.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/tjg.2020.19207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background/aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of recurrent esophageal carcinoma is technically difficult to perform due to submucosal fibrosis that develops after definitive chemoradiation therapy. Therefore, our aim was to evaluate the usefulness of clip-with-thread traction for ESD of esophageal lesions with submucosal fibrosis.

Materials and methods: Four endoscopists excised 16 lesions by ESD in an ex vivo pig training model. Mock lesions (30 mm in diameter) were created, including a 10-mm area of submucosal fibrosis in the center of each lesion. Each endoscopist performed two ESDs with traction (ESD-T) and two without traction (ESD-N). The primary outcome was the time required for submucosal dissection. Secondary outcomes were the rate of en bloc (complete) resection and perforation during the procedure, and the total amount of solution injected.

Results: All esophageal ESDs were completed. The median dissection time was significantly shorter for the ESD-T group (median 12.5 min, interquartile range 10.2-14.5) when comparing to the ESD-N group (median 18.0 min, interquartile range 14.6-19.2) (P=0.040). The en bloc resection rate was 100% in both groups, with a rate of complete resection of 87.5% and a rate of perforation of 37.5% for both groups. The median amount of solution injected was not significantly different between the ESD-T (18.0 ml) and ESD-N (20.5 ml) groups (P=0.526).

Conclusion: Clip-with-thread traction improved the performance of ESD for lesions with submucosal fibrosis. However, the method might not reduce the risk of perforation, which remains an important clinical issue to resolve.

在离体猪训练模型中,用带线夹牵引食管内镜粘膜下剥离食管纤维化病变的疗效。
背景/目的:内镜下粘膜剥离术(ESD)是复发性食管癌的技术难点,因为在明确的放化疗后粘膜下纤维化发生。因此,我们的目的是评估夹线牵引对粘膜下纤维化食管病变ESD的有效性。材料和方法:4名内镜医师在离体猪训练模型上用ESD切除16个病变。模拟病变(直径30 mm),包括每个病变中心10 mm的粘膜下纤维化区域。每位内镜医师分别进行了两次有牵引的静电放电(ESD-T)和两次无牵引的静电放电(ESD-N)。主要结果为粘膜下剥离所需的时间。次要结果是手术过程中整体(完全)切除和穿孔的比率,以及注射溶液的总量。结果:所有食管ESDs均完成。ESD-T组的中位解剖时间(中位12.5 min,四分位数范围10.2 ~ 14.5)明显短于ESD-N组(中位18.0 min,四分位数范围14.6 ~ 19.2)(P=0.040)。两组整体切除率均为100%,其中全切除率为87.5%,穿孔率为37.5%。静电放电- t组(18.0 ml)与静电放电- n组(20.5 ml)注射液中位数差异无统计学意义(P=0.526)。结论:带线夹牵引可提高粘膜下纤维化病变的ESD性能。然而,该方法可能不会降低穿孔的风险,这仍然是一个重要的临床问题需要解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信