{"title":"Untangling the Gordian knot-further resolving the super-species complex of 300-million-year-old xiphosurids by reconstructing their ontogeny.","authors":"Carolin Haug, Joachim T Haug","doi":"10.1007/s00427-020-00648-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The group Xiphosurida (horseshoe \"crabs\") is today only represented by four species. However, in the fossil record, several dozen species have been described, especially from the Carboniferous (about 300 million years ago). Several species have been interpreted as representatives of Euproops or Belinurus, but there is ongoing discussion which of these species are valid and how they can be differentiated. Recent studies suggested that differences in the timing of individual development could provide information for species distinction, exemplified by studies on Euproops danae (Mazon Creek, USA) and Euproops sp. (\"Piesproops\"; Piesberg, Germany). For this study, we reinvestigated all Carboniferous xiphosurids from the British Coal Measures stored in the collections of the Natural History Museum London. Size comparisons of the specimens revealed nine size groups; the smaller specimens were originally labelled as Belinurus, the larger ones as Euproops. The nine size groups exhibit five different morphotypes differing in structures surrounding the posterior shield (= thoracetron): spines of different lengths and, in larger specimens, a more or less developed flange. Two of these morphotypes show significantly longer spines than the remaining specimens and could be conspecific as E. anthrax. The remaining specimens are interpreted as growth series of another species, presumably of E. rotundatus. An ontogenetic flange formation is also known from E. danae and the \"Piesproops\", but the timing differs between all three species. In E. rotundatus, the flange develops rather late, but then comparably abruptly, which makes this development more metamorphic in relation to development in the other species.</p>","PeriodicalId":50588,"journal":{"name":"Development Genes and Evolution","volume":"230 1","pages":"13-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00427-020-00648-7","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development Genes and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-020-00648-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
Abstract
The group Xiphosurida (horseshoe "crabs") is today only represented by four species. However, in the fossil record, several dozen species have been described, especially from the Carboniferous (about 300 million years ago). Several species have been interpreted as representatives of Euproops or Belinurus, but there is ongoing discussion which of these species are valid and how they can be differentiated. Recent studies suggested that differences in the timing of individual development could provide information for species distinction, exemplified by studies on Euproops danae (Mazon Creek, USA) and Euproops sp. ("Piesproops"; Piesberg, Germany). For this study, we reinvestigated all Carboniferous xiphosurids from the British Coal Measures stored in the collections of the Natural History Museum London. Size comparisons of the specimens revealed nine size groups; the smaller specimens were originally labelled as Belinurus, the larger ones as Euproops. The nine size groups exhibit five different morphotypes differing in structures surrounding the posterior shield (= thoracetron): spines of different lengths and, in larger specimens, a more or less developed flange. Two of these morphotypes show significantly longer spines than the remaining specimens and could be conspecific as E. anthrax. The remaining specimens are interpreted as growth series of another species, presumably of E. rotundatus. An ontogenetic flange formation is also known from E. danae and the "Piesproops", but the timing differs between all three species. In E. rotundatus, the flange develops rather late, but then comparably abruptly, which makes this development more metamorphic in relation to development in the other species.
Xiphosurida(马蹄“蟹”)现在只有四个物种。然而,在化石记录中,已经描述了几十个物种,特别是来自石炭纪(大约3亿年前)。一些物种被解释为Euproops或Belinurus的代表,但这些物种中哪些是有效的以及如何区分它们仍在进行讨论。最近的研究表明,个体发育时间的差异可以为物种区分提供信息,例如对美国马松溪(Mazon Creek, USA)和美国马松溪(Piesproops)的研究;Piesberg,德国)。在这项研究中,我们重新调查了伦敦自然历史博物馆收藏的所有石炭纪剑剑类动物。标本的大小比较显示出9个大小组;较小的标本最初被标记为Belinurus,较大的被标记为Euproops。9个大小组表现出5种不同的形态,其结构围绕后盾(=胸胸肌)不同:不同长度的脊柱,在较大的标本中,或多或少发达的法兰。其中两种形态比其他标本的刺明显更长,可能与炭疽热杆菌同源。其余的标本被解释为另一个物种的生长系列,可能是圆尾螺。在E. danae和“Piesproops”中也发现了个体发生的翼缘形成,但这三个物种之间的时间不同。在E. rotundatus中,翼缘的发育相当晚,但随后却相当突然,这使得这种发育与其他物种的发育相比更加变质。
期刊介绍:
Development Genes and Evolution publishes high-quality reports on all aspects of development biology and evolutionary biology. The journal reports on experimental and bioinformatics work at the systemic, cellular and molecular levels in the field of animal and plant systems, covering key aspects of the following topics:
Embryological and genetic analysis of model and non-model organisms
Genes and pattern formation in invertebrates, vertebrates and plants
Axial patterning, embryonic induction and fate maps
Cellular mechanisms of morphogenesis and organogenesis
Stem cells and regeneration
Functional genomics of developmental processes
Developmental diversity and evolution
Evolution of developmentally relevant genes
Phylogeny of animals and plants
Microevolution
Paleontology.