The comparison of the relationships about the presence of branch retinal vein occlusion and endothelial functions between diabetic and non-diabetic patients.
Vahit Demir, Mehmet Tolga Dogru, Zafer Onaran, Huseyin Kandemir, Caglar Alp
{"title":"The comparison of the relationships about the presence of branch retinal vein occlusion and endothelial functions between diabetic and non-diabetic patients.","authors":"Vahit Demir, Mehmet Tolga Dogru, Zafer Onaran, Huseyin Kandemir, Caglar Alp","doi":"10.1097/XCE.0000000000000185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the endothelial functions in both patients with diabetics and non-diabetics with branch retinal vein occlusion by using pulse wave analysis and flow-mediated dilatation methods.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included a total of 136 participants (47 diabetic patients with branch retinal vein occlusion, 43 non-diabetic patients with branch retinal vein occlusion, and 46 otherwise healthy subjects). Evaluation of endothelial functions was performed by flow-mediated dilatation and pulse wave analysis methods. Stiffness index, reflection index (RI), and pulse propagation time were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean stiffness index and RI were significantly higher in the diabetic branch retinal vein occlusion group compared with the non-diabetic branch retinal vein occlusion and the healthy controls (for stiffness index: 11.5 ± 2.8 vs. 10.1 ± 2.5 and 8.3 ± 2.0, <i>P</i> < 0.001; and for RI: 75.1 ± 11.7 vs. 65.4 ± 8.4 and 60.2 ± 18.8, <i>P</i> < 0.001, respectively), whereas the pulse propagation time was significantly lower in the diabetic group (156.4 ± 32.3 vs. 174.4 ± 46.5 and 205.0 ± 58.5, <i>P</i> < 0.001, respectively). There was a significant negative correlation between visual acuity and stiffness index (r = -0.512, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Besides, there was also a significant positive correlation between visual acuity and pulse propagation time (r = 0.398, <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that the stiffness index and RI values were higher in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion compared to the healthy subjects.</p>","PeriodicalId":43231,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":"8 4","pages":"109-114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/XCE.0000000000000185","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCE.0000000000000185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the endothelial functions in both patients with diabetics and non-diabetics with branch retinal vein occlusion by using pulse wave analysis and flow-mediated dilatation methods.
Patients and methods: This cross-sectional study included a total of 136 participants (47 diabetic patients with branch retinal vein occlusion, 43 non-diabetic patients with branch retinal vein occlusion, and 46 otherwise healthy subjects). Evaluation of endothelial functions was performed by flow-mediated dilatation and pulse wave analysis methods. Stiffness index, reflection index (RI), and pulse propagation time were calculated.
Results: The mean stiffness index and RI were significantly higher in the diabetic branch retinal vein occlusion group compared with the non-diabetic branch retinal vein occlusion and the healthy controls (for stiffness index: 11.5 ± 2.8 vs. 10.1 ± 2.5 and 8.3 ± 2.0, P < 0.001; and for RI: 75.1 ± 11.7 vs. 65.4 ± 8.4 and 60.2 ± 18.8, P < 0.001, respectively), whereas the pulse propagation time was significantly lower in the diabetic group (156.4 ± 32.3 vs. 174.4 ± 46.5 and 205.0 ± 58.5, P < 0.001, respectively). There was a significant negative correlation between visual acuity and stiffness index (r = -0.512, P < 0.001). Besides, there was also a significant positive correlation between visual acuity and pulse propagation time (r = 0.398, P < 0.001).
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the stiffness index and RI values were higher in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion compared to the healthy subjects.
目的:本研究通过脉搏波分析和血流介导扩张法研究糖尿病和非糖尿病视网膜分支静脉阻塞患者的内皮功能。患者和方法:这项横断面研究共包括136名参与者(47名糖尿病视网膜分支静脉闭塞患者,43名非糖尿病视网膜分支静脉闭塞患者和46名其他健康受试者)。通过血流介导扩张和脉搏波分析方法评估内皮功能。计算了刚度指数、反射指数(RI)和脉冲传播时间。结果:糖尿病视网膜分支静脉闭塞组的平均僵硬指数和RI明显高于非糖尿病视网膜分支静脉闭塞组和健康对照组(僵硬指数:11.5±2.8 vs 10.1±2.5和8.3±2.0,P < 0.001;RI组:75.1±11.7 vs. 65.4±8.4和60.2±18.8,P < 0.001),而糖尿病组脉搏传播时间明显较低(156.4±32.3 vs. 174.4±46.5和205.0±58.5,P < 0.001)。视敏度与僵硬指数呈显著负相关(r = -0.512, P < 0.001)。此外,视敏度与脉搏传播时间也有显著正相关(r = 0.398, P < 0.001)。结论:本研究表明视网膜分支静脉闭塞患者的僵硬指数和RI值高于健康人。