Validity of Triage Performed by Nurses Educated by Train-of-Trainer Workshop Participants; a Cross-sectional Study for Assessment of Cascade Training System.

Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2019-06-18 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.22114/ajem.v0i0.127
Seyedhossein Seyedhosseini-Davarani, Elham Hesari, Mohammad Afzalimoghadam, Nader Tavakoli, Javad Seyedhosseini, Hooman Hossein-Nejed, Mohammad-Taghi Talebian
{"title":"Validity of Triage Performed by Nurses Educated by Train-of-Trainer Workshop Participants; a Cross-sectional Study for Assessment of Cascade Training System.","authors":"Seyedhossein Seyedhosseini-Davarani,&nbsp;Elham Hesari,&nbsp;Mohammad Afzalimoghadam,&nbsp;Nader Tavakoli,&nbsp;Javad Seyedhosseini,&nbsp;Hooman Hossein-Nejed,&nbsp;Mohammad-Taghi Talebian","doi":"10.22114/ajem.v0i0.127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In 2010, a national triage train-of-trainer (TOT) workshop was held in Tehran, Iran.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study aimed to assess the validity of the triage performed by the nurses educated by those who participated in TOT workshop.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This cross-sectional study was carried out in 6 teaching hospitals from 4 universities in Iran. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of performed triage by participations was measured. Thirteen nurses were randomly selected. Thereafter, at the end of each working shift, patient data recorded in the daily data registry forms were collected. Then, duration of hospital stay, number of cases admitted to general wards or intensive care units, number of cases discharged from the ED within 12 hours and mortality rate were compared with the triage level determined by the nurse.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 30 nurses with a mean age of 28.4 ± 3.7 years were enrolled. In this study, 1491 triage cases (61.6% male) were evaluated, of which 4.2% were triaged as level 1, 18.3% as level 2, 37.1% as level 3, 20.4% as level 4 and 20.0% as level 5. The following outcome was observed: 3.64% were discharged, 6.29% were hospitalized, 3% died and 2.3% were discharged against medical advice without completing treatment. The correlation of determined triage level and patients' duration of hospitalization was significant based on one-way ANOVA test (p = 0.000). The outcome of the patients significantly correlated with the level of triage determined by the study nurses (p = 0.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the findings, it appears that triage performed by the study nurses educated by those who participated in TOT workshop through cascade training system had perfect validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":7290,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":"e2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/da/33/AJEM-4-e2.PMC6955037.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22114/ajem.v0i0.127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: In 2010, a national triage train-of-trainer (TOT) workshop was held in Tehran, Iran.

Objective: The present study aimed to assess the validity of the triage performed by the nurses educated by those who participated in TOT workshop.

Method: This cross-sectional study was carried out in 6 teaching hospitals from 4 universities in Iran. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of performed triage by participations was measured. Thirteen nurses were randomly selected. Thereafter, at the end of each working shift, patient data recorded in the daily data registry forms were collected. Then, duration of hospital stay, number of cases admitted to general wards or intensive care units, number of cases discharged from the ED within 12 hours and mortality rate were compared with the triage level determined by the nurse.

Results: In total, 30 nurses with a mean age of 28.4 ± 3.7 years were enrolled. In this study, 1491 triage cases (61.6% male) were evaluated, of which 4.2% were triaged as level 1, 18.3% as level 2, 37.1% as level 3, 20.4% as level 4 and 20.0% as level 5. The following outcome was observed: 3.64% were discharged, 6.29% were hospitalized, 3% died and 2.3% were discharged against medical advice without completing treatment. The correlation of determined triage level and patients' duration of hospitalization was significant based on one-way ANOVA test (p = 0.000). The outcome of the patients significantly correlated with the level of triage determined by the study nurses (p = 0.000).

Conclusion: Based on the findings, it appears that triage performed by the study nurses educated by those who participated in TOT workshop through cascade training system had perfect validity.

Abstract Image

培训师培训班学员培训的护士分诊的有效性梯级训练系统评估的横断面研究。
简介:2010年,在伊朗德黑兰举行了一次全国分诊培训师培训(TOT)讲习班。目的:本研究旨在评估参加过TOT培训的护士进行分诊的有效性。方法:在伊朗4所大学的6所教学医院进行横断面研究。评估了参与者进行分诊的评分者之间和评分者内部的可靠性。随机选择13名护士。此后,在每个轮班结束时,收集记录在每日数据登记表中的患者数据。然后,将住院时间、入住普通病房或重症监护病房的病例数、12小时内从急诊科出院的病例数和死亡率与护士确定的分诊水平进行比较。结果:共纳入30名护士,平均年龄28.4±3.7岁。本研究共评估1491例分诊病例(男性占61.6%),其中1级为4.2%,2级为18.3%,3级为37.1%,4级为20.4%,5级为20.0%。出院率为3.64%,住院率为6.29%,死亡率为3%,不遵医嘱出院率为2.3%。经单因素方差分析(单因素方差分析),分诊水平与患者住院时间的相关性显著(p = 0.000)。患者的预后与研究护士确定的分诊水平显著相关(p = 0.000)。结论:从研究结果来看,由参加过TOT工作坊的护士通过梯级培训系统所进行的分诊具有良好的效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信