Societal pressures and procreative preferences for gay fathers successfully pursuing parenthood through IVF and gestational carriers

Q1 Social Sciences
Steven R. Lindheim , Jody Lyneé Madeira , Artur Ludwin , Emily Kemner , J. Preston Parry , Georges Sylvestre , Guido Pennings
{"title":"Societal pressures and procreative preferences for gay fathers successfully pursuing parenthood through IVF and gestational carriers","authors":"Steven R. Lindheim ,&nbsp;Jody Lyneé Madeira ,&nbsp;Artur Ludwin ,&nbsp;Emily Kemner ,&nbsp;J. Preston Parry ,&nbsp;Georges Sylvestre ,&nbsp;Guido Pennings","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2019.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This retrospective study surveyed decision-making and challenges among 78 gay cisgender male couples utilizing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and a gestational carrier. While most couples (67.1%) found the decision to actively pursue fertility treatment ‘not difficult’, 32.9% felt that it was ‘somewhat difficult’ or ‘very or extremely difficult’. Almost 30% of couples had not undertaken financial planning for treatment, which introduced delays of &gt;<!--> <!-->2 years for 25.3% of participants. Conceiving twins was ‘important to very important’ in 52.3% of couples, and 84.2% of couples chose to transfer two embryos to ‘increase the odds’ or reach an ideal family size in a single attempt despite increased complications with multiple pregnancies. Paternal leave was granted for one partner in 47.3% of couples, and for both partners in 43.2% of couples. One-third of couples reported experiencing discrimination, prompting a partner to seek employment, and 38% changed jobs or careers. For 80.3% of couples, the estimated cost exceeded US$100,000. Couples where one partner was aged &gt;<!--> <!-->50 years were significantly more likely to find the decision to actively pursue fertility treatment ‘very or extremely difficult’ (28.6%), and less likely to agree on becoming parents (64.3%). Gay male couples undergoing assisted reproduction face challenges regarding decision-making, lack of infertility benefits and discrimination, which appear to be influenced by age and country of residence. Policy and educational changes are needed, including broader fertility benefits, more egalitarian parental leave, and greater awareness of risks inherent to multiple gestation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbms.2019.09.001","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405661819300139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

This retrospective study surveyed decision-making and challenges among 78 gay cisgender male couples utilizing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and a gestational carrier. While most couples (67.1%) found the decision to actively pursue fertility treatment ‘not difficult’, 32.9% felt that it was ‘somewhat difficult’ or ‘very or extremely difficult’. Almost 30% of couples had not undertaken financial planning for treatment, which introduced delays of > 2 years for 25.3% of participants. Conceiving twins was ‘important to very important’ in 52.3% of couples, and 84.2% of couples chose to transfer two embryos to ‘increase the odds’ or reach an ideal family size in a single attempt despite increased complications with multiple pregnancies. Paternal leave was granted for one partner in 47.3% of couples, and for both partners in 43.2% of couples. One-third of couples reported experiencing discrimination, prompting a partner to seek employment, and 38% changed jobs or careers. For 80.3% of couples, the estimated cost exceeded US$100,000. Couples where one partner was aged > 50 years were significantly more likely to find the decision to actively pursue fertility treatment ‘very or extremely difficult’ (28.6%), and less likely to agree on becoming parents (64.3%). Gay male couples undergoing assisted reproduction face challenges regarding decision-making, lack of infertility benefits and discrimination, which appear to be influenced by age and country of residence. Policy and educational changes are needed, including broader fertility benefits, more egalitarian parental leave, and greater awareness of risks inherent to multiple gestation.

Abstract Image

社会压力和生育偏好使同性恋父亲通过试管受精和妊娠载体成功地成为父母
本回顾性研究调查了78对使用体外受精(IVF)和妊娠载体的男同性恋夫妇的决策和挑战。虽然大多数夫妇(67.1%)认为积极寻求生育治疗的决定“不难”,但32.9%的夫妇认为这“有些困难”或“非常或极其困难”。近30%的夫妇没有为治疗进行财务规划,这导致了治疗的延误;25.3%的参与者为2年。52.3%的夫妇认为怀双胞胎“重要到非常重要”,84.2%的夫妇选择移植两个胚胎来“增加几率”,或者尽管多胎妊娠的并发症会增加,但一次尝试就能达到理想的家庭规模。在47.3%的夫妇中,一方可以享受陪产假,43.2%的夫妇双方都可以享受陪产假。三分之一的夫妇称遭遇过歧视,这促使其中一方去找工作,38%的夫妇换了工作或职业。80.3%的夫妇估计花费超过10万美元。一方年龄较大的夫妇;50岁的人更有可能发现积极寻求生育治疗的决定“非常或极其困难”(28.6%),而不太可能同意成为父母(64.3%)。接受辅助生殖的男同性恋夫妇在决策、缺乏不育福利和歧视方面面临挑战,这些似乎受到年龄和居住国的影响。政策和教育改革是必要的,包括更广泛的生育福利,更平等的育儿假,以及对多胎妊娠固有风险的更多认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online
Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: RBMS is a new journal dedicated to interdisciplinary discussion and debate of the rapidly expanding field of reproductive biomedicine, particularly all of its many societal and cultural implications. It is intended to bring to attention new research in the social sciences, arts and humanities on human reproduction, new reproductive technologies, and related areas such as human embryonic stem cell derivation. Its audience comprises researchers, clinicians, practitioners, policy makers, academics and patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信