A comparison between EPSON V700 and EPSON V800 scanners for film dosimetry.

Q3 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Tarafder Shameem, Nick Bennie, Martin Butson, David Thwaites
{"title":"A comparison between EPSON V700 and EPSON V800 scanners for film dosimetry.","authors":"Tarafder Shameem, Nick Bennie, Martin Butson, David Thwaites","doi":"10.1007/s13246-019-00837-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radiochromic film is a good dosimeter choice for patient QA for complex treatment techniques (IMRT, VMAT, SABR, SBRT) because of its near tissue equivalency, very high spatial resolution and established method of use. Commercial scanners are usually used for film dosimetry, among which EPSON scanners are the most common. NCCI have used an EPSON V700 scanner, but recently acquired a new model EPSON V800 scanner. The purpose of this work was to evaluate any differences between these two scanners to consider whether they can be used interchangeably or not. Different aspects of film dosimetry, e.g. lateral response artefact (LRA) effect, orientation effect, scanner response etc., were compared. EBT3 films were irradiated with 40 × 40 cm<sup>2</sup> field size 6 MV beams and scanned in both the scanners. The scanned images were read in ImageJ V1.49 software. The data obtained was then copied in MS Excel to compare the scanners. The V800 scanner causes more polarisation, which results in more LRA effect than for the V700 scanner. The responses of the scanners in all three colour channels are not the same for the same film and irradiation. The V800 scanner shows an increase of response of up to 1.6% compared to 3.7% increase in the V700 scanner after scanning a piece of irradiated film 20 times. The scanners cannot be used interchangeably. The correction factors for LRA effect and the calibration curves are different. Further characterisation, evaluation and commissioning is required before clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":55430,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-019-00837-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Radiochromic film is a good dosimeter choice for patient QA for complex treatment techniques (IMRT, VMAT, SABR, SBRT) because of its near tissue equivalency, very high spatial resolution and established method of use. Commercial scanners are usually used for film dosimetry, among which EPSON scanners are the most common. NCCI have used an EPSON V700 scanner, but recently acquired a new model EPSON V800 scanner. The purpose of this work was to evaluate any differences between these two scanners to consider whether they can be used interchangeably or not. Different aspects of film dosimetry, e.g. lateral response artefact (LRA) effect, orientation effect, scanner response etc., were compared. EBT3 films were irradiated with 40 × 40 cm2 field size 6 MV beams and scanned in both the scanners. The scanned images were read in ImageJ V1.49 software. The data obtained was then copied in MS Excel to compare the scanners. The V800 scanner causes more polarisation, which results in more LRA effect than for the V700 scanner. The responses of the scanners in all three colour channels are not the same for the same film and irradiation. The V800 scanner shows an increase of response of up to 1.6% compared to 3.7% increase in the V700 scanner after scanning a piece of irradiated film 20 times. The scanners cannot be used interchangeably. The correction factors for LRA effect and the calibration curves are different. Further characterisation, evaluation and commissioning is required before clinical use.

EPSON V700 和 EPSON V800 扫描仪在胶片剂量测定方面的比较。
放射性变色胶片是复杂治疗技术(IMRT、VMAT、SABR、SBRT)患者剂量质量保证的理想选择,因为它具有接近组织等效性、极高的空间分辨率和成熟的使用方法。胶片剂量测定通常使用商用扫描仪,其中最常见的是 EPSON 扫描仪。NCCI 曾使用 EPSON V700 型扫描仪,但最近又购置了新型 EPSON V800 型扫描仪。这项工作的目的是评估这两种扫描仪之间的差异,以考虑它们是否可以互换使用。对胶片剂量测定的不同方面进行了比较,如横向响应伪影(LRA)效应、定向效应、扫描仪响应等。用 40 × 40 平方厘米磁场大小的 6 MV 光束照射 EBT3 胶片,并在两种扫描仪上进行扫描。扫描图像在 ImageJ V1.49 软件中读取。然后将获得的数据复制到 MS Excel 中,对两种扫描仪进行比较。与 V700 扫描仪相比,V800 扫描仪产生的偏振更多,从而导致更多的 LRA 效应。在相同胶片和辐照条件下,扫描仪对所有三个彩色通道的响应不尽相同。V800 扫描仪在对一张经过辐照的胶片进行 20 次扫描后,其响应增加了 1.6%,而 V700 扫描仪则增加了 3.7%。这两种扫描仪不能互换使用。LRA 效应的校正系数和校准曲线不同。在临床使用之前,还需要进行进一步的鉴定、评估和调试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine (APESM) is a multidisciplinary forum for information and research on the application of physics and engineering to medicine and human physiology. APESM covers a broad range of topics that include but is not limited to: - Medical physics in radiotherapy - Medical physics in diagnostic radiology - Medical physics in nuclear medicine - Mathematical modelling applied to medicine and human biology - Clinical biomedical engineering - Feature extraction, classification of EEG, ECG, EMG, EOG, and other biomedical signals; - Medical imaging - contributions to new and improved methods; - Modelling of physiological systems - Image processing to extract information from images, e.g. fMRI, CT, etc.; - Biomechanics, especially with applications to orthopaedics. - Nanotechnology in medicine APESM offers original reviews, scientific papers, scientific notes, technical papers, educational notes, book reviews and letters to the editor. APESM is the journal of the Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine, and also the official journal of the College of Biomedical Engineers, Engineers Australia and the Asia-Oceania Federation of Organizations for Medical Physics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信