Factors Associated With Colonoscopy Compliance Based on Health Belief Model in a Community-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program Shanghai, China.

IF 1.3 Q2 Social Sciences
Lihua He, Shuna Gao, Sha Tao, Weiyi Li, Juan Du, Yunfang Ji, Yejing Wang
{"title":"Factors Associated With Colonoscopy Compliance Based on Health Belief Model in a Community-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program Shanghai, China.","authors":"Lihua He, Shuna Gao, Sha Tao, Weiyi Li, Juan Du, Yunfang Ji, Yejing Wang","doi":"10.1177/0272684X19897356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Screening can help early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the general population. However, colonoscopy compliance in screening program is low in China. The study aimed to identify factors associated with colonoscopy compliance based on Health Belief Model (HBM). An investigation was conducted in Huangpu District, Shanghai in 2015. High-risk individuals of CRC received an in-person interview with physicians to fill out a questionnaire. The questionnaires assessing predictors of colonoscopy compliance were collected, and status of colonoscopy participation was determined. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted. Among 2,568 high-risk population (20.68%), 531 subjects underwent colonoscopy. Participants with both risk assessment and fecal immunochemical test positive were most likely to undergo colonoscopy. Based on HBM, colonoscopy compliance was positively associated with higher perceived severity (odds ratio [OR] = 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [1.00, 1.10]). Higher perceived barriers (OR = 0.97, 95% CI = [0.94, 0.99]), without prior colonoscopy (OR = 0.35, 95% CI = [0.26, 0.47]), not knowing anyone who underwent colonoscopy before (OR = 0.74, 95% CI = [0.58, 0.96]), without health-care provider recommendation on colonoscopy (OR = 0.58, 95% CI = [0.44, 0.77]), and without psychosocial support from someone for colonoscopy (OR = 0.27, 95% CI = [0.21, 0.35]) were shown to be associated with colonoscopy noncompliance. The colonoscopy compliance was low in this CRC screening program in Shanghai, China. The influencing factors were positive results in primary screening, perceived severity, perceived barriers, personal or others’ experiences in colonoscopy, health-care provider recommendation, and psychosocial supports. Effective education campaign and facilitated communication between health-care providers and high-risk population were suggested in the future interventions.","PeriodicalId":54184,"journal":{"name":"International Quarterly of Community Health Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0272684X19897356","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Quarterly of Community Health Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0272684X19897356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/12/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Screening can help early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the general population. However, colonoscopy compliance in screening program is low in China. The study aimed to identify factors associated with colonoscopy compliance based on Health Belief Model (HBM). An investigation was conducted in Huangpu District, Shanghai in 2015. High-risk individuals of CRC received an in-person interview with physicians to fill out a questionnaire. The questionnaires assessing predictors of colonoscopy compliance were collected, and status of colonoscopy participation was determined. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted. Among 2,568 high-risk population (20.68%), 531 subjects underwent colonoscopy. Participants with both risk assessment and fecal immunochemical test positive were most likely to undergo colonoscopy. Based on HBM, colonoscopy compliance was positively associated with higher perceived severity (odds ratio [OR] = 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [1.00, 1.10]). Higher perceived barriers (OR = 0.97, 95% CI = [0.94, 0.99]), without prior colonoscopy (OR = 0.35, 95% CI = [0.26, 0.47]), not knowing anyone who underwent colonoscopy before (OR = 0.74, 95% CI = [0.58, 0.96]), without health-care provider recommendation on colonoscopy (OR = 0.58, 95% CI = [0.44, 0.77]), and without psychosocial support from someone for colonoscopy (OR = 0.27, 95% CI = [0.21, 0.35]) were shown to be associated with colonoscopy noncompliance. The colonoscopy compliance was low in this CRC screening program in Shanghai, China. The influencing factors were positive results in primary screening, perceived severity, perceived barriers, personal or others’ experiences in colonoscopy, health-care provider recommendation, and psychosocial supports. Effective education campaign and facilitated communication between health-care providers and high-risk population were suggested in the future interventions.
基于健康信念模型的社区结直肠癌筛查项目结肠镜检查依从性相关因素研究
筛查有助于在一般人群中早期发现结直肠癌(CRC)。然而,结肠镜筛查的依从性在中国很低。本研究旨在基于健康信念模型(Health Belief Model, HBM)确定结肠镜检查依从性的相关因素。2015年在上海黄浦区进行了一项调查。结直肠癌高危人群接受医师面对面访谈,填写问卷。收集评估结肠镜检查依从性预测因素的问卷,并确定结肠镜检查参与状况。进行单因素和多元逻辑回归分析。在2568名高危人群(20.68%)中,531名患者接受了结肠镜检查。风险评估和粪便免疫化学测试均呈阳性的参与者最有可能接受结肠镜检查。基于HBM,结肠镜检查依从性与较高的感知严重程度呈正相关(优势比[OR] = 1.05, 95%可信区间[CI] =[1.00, 1.10])。较高的认知障碍(OR = 0.97, 95% CI =[0.94, 0.99])、未做过结肠镜检查(OR = 0.35, 95% CI =[0.26, 0.47])、不认识以前做过结肠镜检查的人(OR = 0.74, 95% CI =[0.58, 0.96])、没有医疗保健提供者关于结肠镜检查的建议(OR = 0.58, 95% CI =[0.44, 0.77])以及没有结肠镜检查时他人的社会心理支持(OR = 0.27, 95% CI =[0.21, 0.35])与结肠镜检查不依从性相关。在中国上海的结直肠癌筛查项目中结肠镜检查依从性较低。影响因素包括初步筛查的阳性结果、感知到的严重程度、感知到的障碍、个人或他人在结肠镜检查中的经历、卫生保健提供者的建议和社会心理支持。建议在今后的干预措施中开展有效的教育运动,促进保健提供者与高危人群之间的沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Quarterly of Community Health Education
International Quarterly of Community Health Education PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The International Quarterly of Community Health Education is committed to publishing applied research, policy and case studies dealing with community health education and its relationship to social change. Since 1981, this rigorously peer-referred Journal has contained a wide selection of material in readable style and format by contributors who are not only authorities in their field, but can also write with vigor, clarity, and occasionally with humor. Since its introduction the Journal has considered all manuscripts, especially encouraging stimulating articles which manage to combine maximum readability with scholarly standards.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信